• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Wars live action series: how grownup is too grownup?

Temis the Vorta

Fleet Admiral
Admiral
The problem with the live-action series.

But according to longtime Lucas producer Rick McCallum, there's a bigger obstacle than the show's finances: It's not exactly family-friendly...What's got McCallum more worried is how to sell the show's adult content and still maintain the Star Wars brand.
"Our biggest problem is that these stories are adult. I mean...these are like Deadwood in space. It so unlike anything you've ever associated with George before in relation to Star Wars. These aren't for kids. I mean, we hope they'll watch, but it's not being targeted at 8-to-9 year old boys."​
It's possible to make Star Wars that is "grown up" but not "adult." McCallum is right that Deadwood is outside the Star Wars brand, but doesn't need to be like Deadwood to have appeal to grown ups. The series doesn't need to be "gritty" (to use an overused term) by having the sex and violence of a cable series, and the overarching sense of doom and the futility of human existence blah blah blah.

Star Wars
' essential character is that it doesn't exist in that kind of "real world." It exists in a stylized cosmos derived from myth, which has a deliberate air of unreality about it. Regardless of whether you think there's some kind of "eternal clash between good and evil" in our universe, there's one in the Star Wars universe, and in fact, that's the single defining element of that universe.

So the Deadwood approach would be off-brand even if it were as sanitized as Sesame Street. It exists in the wrong universe.

To have a grown-up Star Wars simply would mean more complexity and depth to personalities and politics. The OT was pretty simple (if effective) in that regard; a TV series would give you more latitude to play with. There could even be more theological/metaphysical complexity, delving more into the actual meaning of the "eternal clash between good and evil."

The violence never needs to get worse than PG - the good guys fighting and killing actual flesh and blood beings, not just robots, but not necessarily in a graphic way. And sex has always struck me as out of place in Star Wars. Leia's bikini is about as far as they need to take it.

Basically, take the approach of The Clone Wars and put less emphasis on action, and more on the characters and the complexity of the storyline. You could have a show that a smart eight year old could follow, but wouldn't bore a grown-up.
 
That sounds... kinda awesome.

Anyways, what you do is what Batman is doing. They release a kids cartoon (Brave and the Bold - my 3 and 5 year old nephews love it). They release a more mature Batman cartoon (The Batman, Direct to DVD movies, Timm-verse Batman, etc etc), and then they also release the adult Batman (Nolan movies) stuff. It's all about effective targeted marketing.

Also I don't really see why they have to reach "Deadwood" levels of maturity. Hell, just hitting a Farscape/Angel/DS9/LOST level of maturity would be more than enough.
 
Also I don't really see why they have to reach "Deadwood" levels of maturity. Hell, just hitting a Farscape/Angel/DS9/LOST level of maturity would be more than enough.
Thank you. I was going to post something similar-namely, the original Trek was a 10pm show, that didn't stop young-ins like me from watching once it hit rerun syndication.
The assumation that you can't be adult without tossing in cuss words and naked boobies is really tiresome. :scream: Just tell a good frickin story (that makes sense!), and everybody will line up for it.
It's Star Wars stupid. :p
 
For all we know, "scruffy nerfherder" is as salacious as anything Al Swearegen ever spewed at the screen. And "sithspawn" definitely sounds nasty.
 
Original.jpg
 
Yeah, I don't really see the need to take things up to a "Deadwood" level of content. Like Temis said, they just need make the stories a little more complex, and maybe get into some darker themes for it to be more "adult". They really don't need all of the sex/nudity, graphic violence, or languarge for adults to get into it.
 
Yeah, I don't really see the need to take things up to a "Deadwood" level of content. Like Temis said, they just need make the stories a little more complex.

Actually, what they need is to make the stories, period.

After seven years, I've given up waiting for this show.
 
There was a LOT of interest in this a while ago. If they don't get it moving soon, no-one will care.

Oh, wait...
 
I would cheerfully give it a shot. However, my hunch is that it would end up being faux-dark, a la Stargate: Universe. That show is a good demonstration that it's easier to say, "let go real dark and gritty" than to pull it off successfully.
 
I'm surprised Lucas is even worried about this. "Tone" is something he hasn't gotten right in any of the prequels. He constantly mixes goofy elements with really dark elements. He can't decide what kind of story he wants to tell.
 
^ Couldn't agree less. He knew exactly what he wanted and unlike any other filmmaker out there he has the money to custom make the movie that he wants to see. Sorry you didn't like it, but don't chalk it up to indecision or ineptitude on Lucas' part.

Besides it's a moot point. Though he remains the owner, he no longer works at Lucasfilm. Kathleen Kennedy runs the joint now. He's finally on to those smaller, personal abstract films he's been talking about for 30 years now.
 
Lucas is retiring - there's hope he may just turn the whole shebang over to his employees, such as the ones who are working on The Clone Wars. They've got the right idea, and get the tone just right, keeping it mythic and heroic.

They've also got interesting ideas for expanding upon the metaphysics of the Force - the Mortis Arc is definitely the right idea, throwing out some cool ideas and awesome visuals, while not destroying the mystery by explaining everything in a straightforward way.

All they really need to do, is to take what they're currently doing and increase the complexity of the storytelling so that it has more appeal to grownups. But Star Wars always needs to have Jedi or Force users of some sort at the core of the story, at least one character. Just having it be about gangster and bounty hunters, eh, that wouldn't work. Sounds like Firefly.

He knew exactly what he wanted and unlike any other filmmaker out there he has the money to custom make the movie that he wants to see. Sorry you didn't like it, but don't chalk it up to indecision or ineptitude on Lucas' part.

Lucas' idea in the prequels seemed to be, to ignore the notion that Star Wars is in some mythical cosmos where there is an actual, literal, conflict between good and evil. He wanted the story to be about complex personalities and "real life" political wrangles. He even gave the Force a boring technobabble reason for existence.

In other words, if he had succeeded, he would have turned it into Star Trek. Hey, I love Star Trek but I don't want Star Wars to be that. The more important point is, he didn't succeed, he just made a mess.
 
Temis the Vorta said:
Lucas' idea in the prequels seemed to be, to ignore the notion that Star Wars is in some mythical cosmos where there is an actual, literal, conflict between good and evil.

Yep, no conflict between good and evil in the PT. Certainly not one with color coded weapons or anything like that, so we know who's who.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top