• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Wars Books Thread

I'm not saying that others can't like that stuff, I'm just giving my opinion on it. Everyone has things they don't like, even entire categories. But, I don't think stating my loathing of country music or spicy food would get so many people annoyed, at least not on a forum like this.
Country music? I, generally, don't like country music. There are many tropes and cliches in the music that I cannot stand. However, I have been giving it more of a chance and have found several songs that I like. Do I like all country music? No. Do I like some songs? Yes.
Do I think ALL YA fiction is angsty and meaningless? No. Do I get enjoyment out of some YA books? Yes, I do.

Books are not cut from whole cloth.

19 is barely "teenaged", and its definitely at the "adult" stage. Plus, being about a teen doesn't automatically make it YA. It was also 1977, long before YA became the thing it is today. So, no, SW is not YA, and neither is the premise. The main characters also don't fit into that category.
Not according to contemporary psychological theory.
 
Country music? I, generally, don't like country music. There are many tropes and cliches in the music that I cannot stand. However, I have been giving it more of a chance and have found several songs that I like. Do I like all country music? No. Do I like some songs? Yes.
Do I think ALL YA fiction is angsty and meaningless? No. Do I get enjoyment out of some YA books? Yes, I do.

Books are not cut from whole cloth.


Not according to contemporary psychological theory.
We really need to jettison psychological theory then.
 
Like I said, they "count" as far as Lucasfilm not letting the real Novels specifically go against them but that doesn't make them legitimate compared to the GA books.

The YA Star Wars novels are as real as the GA stuff. That's how it's always worked, from Legends to now. In fact the current YA stuff (and the Star Wars books in general) actually have claim to being more real and the GA Legends stuff was back in the day.

They're still badly done fluff...

Empirical research on my part leads me to disagree with your opinion.

and, outside of ruining opportunities for stories to be told in the real books, will never be important to the new canon, anymore then the books for 5 year olds are.

So, the fact that they're treated as equally important by the people making this stuff (the ones who decide what's important and what's not) means nothing?

We're still getting less GA books and more YA (and by that I mean the Twilight style YA, not lumping little kids books in that category) then we did in the old EU.

A.) There have been no Twilight Star Wars books yet (I know, I've been reading them). B.) Is there a correlation between the shift? Remember, Del Rey doesn't do YA, so the YA stuff by by LucasFilm Press can't be taking slots away from the Del Rey stuff, any more than McDonald's adding more chicken sandwiches to their menu means that they make fewer Big Macs.

Everyone has the right to decide whether a SW book or category of books is legitimate to them.

That's "personal canon." I don't think we're talking about that here, correct?

Based on how they hold back the GA books from doing any story even slightly important...

Let's see, Catalyst was GA, as was Dark Disciple, Tarkin, and A New Dawn. Bear in mind, only two new movies have been released so far. There hasn't been much of a chance to tell important stories yet.

...and the fact that they hire a bunch of mediocre writers like Grey and Wendig...

I kind of agree with Windig, but I read both of Grey's Star Wars stuff and she's easily a good writer in this series, IMHO. They've also hired a lot of good writers; John Jackson Miller (A New Dawn), James Lucino (Tarkin, Catalyst), Paul S. Kemp (Dark Lords of the Sith), Alexander Freed (Rogue One novelization), Michael Kogge (written a lot of the junior novelizations, which are a lot better written than most books in this genre are), and Timothy Zahn (Thrawn). They easily outnumber the weaker writers to date.

...they obviously don't see the real SW books as something to put any effort into.

I beg to differ. As pointed out above, they're hiring a lot of good writers. The quality of Del Rey's books is pretty steady and, on average, equal or better than Legend's good and best stuff.

Not that any effort gets put into the YA stuff...

Now, how do we know that?

...but they obviously thing cutting down on GA books and churning out YA stuff is where the money is, not telling good stories with the normal books and making money that way.

They are telling good stories from what I've seen across the board.

The story group only exists to make sure the books don't contradict the movies. That is all they do, and if they cared about anything else then, for example, rebels would be a comletely different (aka higher quality) show, among many other things.

As an animation fan, I can tell you that Rebels is easily one of the best in the business.

The only quality comes from the writers that can fight through the mediocrity.

Such as?

As for the new canon, its terribly constructed. Actually, that's too generous, because its not constructed.

:guffaw:

Um, no. From following the stuff, I've seen a lot of interlocking between unrelated stories. The groundwork has been well set. Consistency is at a high. This is a more internally consistent canon than we got with Legends, and so far, as more consistency in quality (IMHO).

I don't have to eat excrement to know it tastes awful. Same goes with reading YA books.

To use your analogy, you're refusing to even see if what you're calling excrement is, in fact, excrement.

All they did was put in a few cameos to appease the few people watching Rebels. No backstory was worked into anything. Take out the 10 seconds of Rebels cameos and all they have is an obscure character from the good Star Wars cartoon to connect RO to anything but the movies.

But, the fact that the movie is supporting a "lower" piece of canon is a new thing for the franchise. It's finally acting as one mega story across the board.

If its about YA, my opinion is accurate. For me, at least. Like I've said, no one has to agree, but my opinion on YA is definitely not wrong.

True, but you're presenting it as fact, not opinion.

Bloodlines is an example of a bad GA book..

So, you did read it, huh?

...and being written by a woman who has written nothing but YA romances before it almost makes it an honorary YA book, to the point where it might be the exception to my "any GA book is better then a YA book" rule.

Since Bloodlines is not a romance, YA or otherwise, that makes no sense to me.

Your right, yA doesn't only equal Twilight. It also sometimes equals "Hunger Games".

"Hunger Games" is it's own genre, too. YA transcends specific genres, since it is not a genre in and of itself, anymore than live action is a movie genre, but a style of movie creation used to make films in various genres.

You having read it and me not having read it doesn't matter, its completely irrelevant to my opinion on the garbage YA stuff like Ahsoka.

Not really. You're making a declarative statement, a judgement. That needs proof to back it up, which means examining the book in question. You won't provide any, and when I, who have first-hand proof, say that I think you're mistaken, you repeat your first opinion, effectively saying that I am wrong. That is intellectually dishonest, so I can say with accuracy that you are mistaken here.

A book which, to be fair, would have been terrible as a GA book because of how Filoni ruined the character post TCW, but made even worse by adding YA junk to it.

Ahsoka takes place within a couple years of TCW (it's set right after Order 66), so I found it skewed closest to the TCW-era of the character. For what it's worth, the author, E. K. Johnston, loved the Ahsoka character, so it was written by someone with a personal interest in doing right by the character

If it was written after TCW series ended, then its not written like TCW era.

I didn't think so, but I only read the darn thing. What do I know compared to you, who never read it and is only judging it by the section in the bookstore that it's sold?

Nope. "Angsty teen drama" is literally a synonym for YA. Its just one of the ways to describe all YA books.

You are factually wrong. I should know. I read a lot. I specifically minored in writing as part of my college education. I like examining books, commentary on fiction, author's comments in regards to their writing. I know what I'm taking about here.

I don't think that the Star Wars version of Twilight dodged any bullet. Its the most standard YA SW book, and its the Twilight variety.

Wrong, it's not a Twilight-style book.

At least the Hunger Games rip offs are somewhat less terrible. Still trash, but anything is better then straight up twilight romance garbage.

I only read the original Hunger Games novel. I thought it was okay, but not the icon it's become.

Clauia Grey has literally written nothing but blatant Twilight clones, and then SW Bloodlines. That is her whole career, and I have her own website to back that up.

I'm not talking about her other stuff, I'm taking about her Star Wars stuff and they are not Twilight-like books. That's a fact, just like it's a fact that Spider-Man is a superhero movie.

I'll just watch the movie.

Your call, but you're missing out on a really great book. (It reads like a regular novel, not a novelization, if that makes any sense. We get into Jyn's head a lot which really adds a lot of meaning to the movie. Her relationship with her father is really well done.)

Yeah, and a lot worse. But, I said "resembled", not an exact match.

I actually think the Rebels eyes looked better. They seemed more realistic, and so make his expressions seem more real. I will concede that I think the bluer Legends look was slightly better, but I thought it was a good translation, personally.

Well, they obviously don't care or put any effort into Rebels, and even if they hypothetically were putting 100% into it then that would probably make them the most incompetent people to have ever worked on a Star wars project, and I'm including prequel era george lucas and the people who made the Star Wars Holiday Special in that statement.

Aren't there rules against libel here?

You mean literally the worst released X-Men cartoon that isn't Pryde of the X-Men?

Ouch. Did you see it? I will concede the first couple seasons were rough, but it found its feet. They had decent characterizations overall, did Apocalypse quite well, and was the first time that the Sentinels were actually a threat (this was before Days of Future Past did good Sentinels on the big screen).

The show that I'm pretty sure even the people who created it forgot 5 seconds after it ended and really made no impact on anything?

Wrong. Evolution is arguably the most influential X-Men cartoon to date; the character X-23/Laura Kinney was an original character created specifically for this show. She was brought into the comics (basically utilizing an expanded version of her cartoon backstory), and has starred in her own ongoing series (including one right now) and will be appearing in the next X-Men movie, Logan, as one of the leads.

My opnion on this can't be wrong, at least not for me. Star Wars YA is fluff and garbage. You don't have to agree, but that doesn't make me wrong.

Why do you present them as facts, then?

I got that you were joking, it just happened to be a joke that's probably a bit too real (unintentionally). I didn't bother to read the blurb, but I'm sure there is a lot of YA junk they can stick in to whatever premise they set up.

The blurb:

When Jyn Erso was five years old, her mother was murdered and her father taken from her to serve the Empire. But despite the loss of her parents she is not completely alone—Saw Gerrera, a man willing to go to any extremes necessary in order to resist Imperial tyranny, takes her in as his own, and gives her not only a home but all the abilities and resources she needs to become a rebel herself.

Jyn dedicates herself to the cause—and the man. But fighting alongside Saw and his people brings with it danger and the question of just how far Jyn is willing to go as one of Saw’s soldiers. When she faces an unthinkable betrayal that shatters her world, Jyn will have to pull the pieces of herself back together and figure out what she truly believes in…and who she can really trust.

Doesn't sound much like my joke story.

Then it was a "Hunger games" type YA with the romance less of a focus, but teen angst is teen angst.

It wasn't a Hunger Games-type story. Myth double busted.

Nope. A YA book can't star the character from Rogue One, because she's not a YA protagonist. They'll have the same name and physical appearance, but in the end the book will just be either Bella or Jennifer Lawrence, or slight variations of them, when it comes to characterization.

"So sure are you? Always with you, it cannot be done."

Well, the books "Jyn" will inevitably be like a character from either Hunger Games or twilight, which one it is doesn't really matter at this point.

It matters to me. I did read the sample chapters posted online and so far, she's herself.


SW is a general audiences franchise.

General means everyone, which encompasses YA, GA, what have you. It can do both. It doesn't need to limit itself to one.

The GA books aren't adult targeted, they're aimed at a general audience but not written for kids or teens.

Sure sounds like an adult-targeted book to me. (I read a lot of GA Star Wars books in my teens. They are essentially the same as most YA books I've read, just a different size. The same's true today, from what I've read.)

As for Jyn, its a YA book. she either has a boyfriend or, if the book is progressive enough, a girlfriend or something along those lines. The only thing different will be if her significant other is an alien or not.

The Star Wars website said this about the novel when announcing it:

Rebel Rising, a young adult novel from New York Times Bestselling author Beth Revis, will dive into Jyn’s backstory, exploring her time with the extremist rebel Saw Gerrera and how it shaped the woman she’d become. Rogue One hinted at the once-close relationship between Saw and Jyn, which was ultimately fractured. Rebel Rising promises to be our first real look into what happened between the two, good times and bad.

Doesn't look like the odds are in your favor.
 
Last edited:
That's because Disney and the Story Group want the movies and any possible tv shows at front and centre.
:eek: The horror! You have opened my eyes to this terrible injustice! The very idea we could have new Star Wars movies, and TV shows! And that someone would put them on a pedestal over novels that are confirmed to only be read by 1% of the fandom. It's ghastly!
 
That's because Disney and the Story Group want the movies and any possible tv shows at front and centre.

Of course, Star Wars is a movie franchise first and foremost. They were aways front and center. The tie-ins were never the core of the franchise.

The books will never hold any significance again.

Legends never had any real significance to the franchise. Under new canon policy, this's really the only time that the books can claim any significance.
 
What exactly do you disagree with? What inaccuracies have been stated?
I have disagreed with pretty much everything you and Kirk have said in the last two or three pages, and most of that stuff is factually wrong.
I will agree that the movies are put above the books, but that is because Star Wars is a movie franchise with a few tie in books, comics, video games, and TV series. Everything is secondary to the movies, and that is the way it's supposed to be.
 
Legends never had any real significance to the franchise. Under new canon policy, this's really the only time that the books can claim any significance.
Yeah, we saw how much "significance" Legends had when Lucasfilm was producing new movies and TV shows that happily contradicted established Legends lore.
 
The YA Star Wars novels are as real as the GA stuff. That's how it's always worked, from Legends to now. In fact the current YA stuff (and the Star Wars books in general) actually have claim to being more real and the GA Legends stuff was back in the day.

In no reality does the YA stuff have more claim to being real then the old EU stuff, but whatever.

So, the fact that they're treated as equally important by the people making this stuff (the ones who decide what's important and what's not) means nothing?

They're not treated as equally important. Not going out of the way to contradict some garbage from Star Wars: Twilight doesn't give Lost stars equal importance to Tarkin, Lords of the Sith, etc. It just means 1) they don't want to mess with the YA cash cow, and 2) nothing in the YA books is important enough to bother contradicting. Outside of banning real books from telling certain stories in the same time period of some of the YA books, probably to spread the stories out more then anything, and giving a few unimportant references the YA stuff isn't important and doesn't contribute anything to the real SW stuff.

A.) There have been no Twilight Star Wars books yet (I know, I've been reading them).

Yes there is. Its called Lost Stars, a YA romance (aka Twilight book) from a woman who usually writes books that are even more blatantly Twilight clones.

Let's see, Catalyst was GA, as was Dark Disciple, Tarkin, and A New Dawn. Bear in mind, only two new movies have been released so far. There hasn't been much of a chance to tell important stories yet.

I don't count "important" as connected to movies. What about stories with characters post RotJ (that aren't written by YA romance authors)? What about the Old Republic, either right before the fall or in the old KOTOR era? What about stories in any era with characters that aren't related to the movies, or with side characters? Tell some X-Wing type stories, give us some post ROTJ Lando, maybe a Boba Fett adventure or bring back some old EU characters like Talon Karde and Mara Jade. There is a universe of stuff, and the old EU sold books with it. They sold books with the major focus on characters never even hinted at in the movies, and made a profit doing it. That can all be important. Certainly more important and more varied then stuff about New republic politics or what Snap wexley is doing or making a book about the parts of Rogue One that didn't need elaboration.

I kind of agree with Windig, but I read both of Grey's Star Wars stuff and she's easily a good writer in this series, IMHO. They've also hired a lot of good writers; John Jackson Miller (A New Dawn), James Lucino (Tarkin, Catalyst), Paul S. Kemp (Dark Lords of the Sith), Alexander Freed (Rogue One novelization), Michael Kogge (written a lot of the junior novelizations, which are a lot better written than most books in this genre are), and Timothy Zahn (Thrawn). They easily outnumber the weaker writers to date.

Well, disqualifying the junior novelization writer and the Twilight cloner, there are a few decent writers (although I can't speak for Freed, although I know some good authors make quick money with novelizations so I won't count that against him). Its too bad they don't really get to branch out. Miller got stuck with leftovers from Rebels, and the fact he made it tolerable honestly makes him more qualified to run Rebels then Filoni. But, when your supposed "universally important" books are a crappy trilogy written by Wendig, they obviously have problems getting good writers.

I beg to differ. As pointed out above, they're hiring a lot of good writers. The quality of Del Rey's books is pretty steady and, on average, equal or better than Legend's good and best stuff.

The old EU was great, with 90% of the books being at least good. Even the best new canon books (in my opinion that would be Tarkin and Lords of the Sith) don't measure up to the greatness of the EU. don't get me wrong, they'd both be solid entries in comparison to the old EU, but not top tier.

They are telling good stories from what I've seen across the board.

They're not even telling good stories across the board with the GA books, and no YA books have good stories, so I definitely disagree with this.

As an animation fan, I can tell you that Rebels is easily one of the best in the business.

I watch a lot of animated tV, and Rebels is definitely garbage. Not quite "Teen Titans Go!" level, but its easily the worst SW cartoon (and I'm including Ewoks and Droids in that statement). Badly written (even for its target audsience of 5 year olds), terrible characters, and a pretty bad art style (although, to be fair, tCW didn't have a great style either, but it was better then Rebels).


Um, no. From following the stuff, I've seen a lot of interlocking between unrelated stories. The groundwork has been well set. Consistency is at a high. This is a more internally consistent canon than we got with Legends, and so far, as more consistency in quality (IMHO).

Nope. the quality of the old EU was much more consistent, and the new canon's only "ground work" is the movies. Also, "internally consistent" doesn't really equal "good".

To use your analogy, you're refusing to even see if what you're calling excrement is, in fact, excrement.

I've seen enough feces to identify it fairly easily, and YA stuff has a very distinctive scent.

But, the fact that the movie is supporting a "lower" piece of canon is a new thing for the franchise. It's finally acting as one mega story across the board.

No its not. Some low ranking person at the FX department managed to slip a few Rebels references in (well, either that or marketing people did) and someone stuck Saw in because they needed a character for that role and, again, it fit for marketing purposes.

So, you did read it, huh?

I'd never read a book by a Twilight cloner.

Since Bloodlines is not a romance, YA or otherwise, that makes no sense to me.

Its the same quality, and I'm sure it only doesn't have romance because Disney wouldn't let Grey make Leia fall in love with someone besides Han.

"Hunger Games" is it's own genre, too. YA transcends specific genres, since it is not a genre in and of itself, anymore than live action is a movie genre, but a style of movie creation used to make films in various genres.

Nope. YA is YA. It has variations in setting (like outer space or historical fiction or modern earth, etc), but that's just cosmetic.

Not really. You're making a declarative statement, a judgement. That needs proof to back it up, which means examining the book in question. You won't provide any, and when I, who have first-hand proof, say that I think you're mistaken, you repeat your first opinion, effectively saying that I am wrong. That is intellectually dishonest, so I can say with accuracy that you are mistaken here.

You can't tell me what to think of a book, and I don't have to read something to form an opinion on it. To think otherwise is ridiculous.

Ahsoka takes place within a couple years of TCW (it's set right after Order 66), so I found it skewed closest to the TCW-era of the character. For what it's worth, the author, E. K. Johnston, loved the Ahsoka character, so it was written by someone with a personal interest in doing right by the character

I'm sure Filoni would claim to like the charater too, and he ruined her. If the author really liked the character, they wouldn't have written a YA book with her.

I didn't think so, but I only read the darn thing. What do I know compared to you, who never read it and is only judging it by the section in the bookstore that it's sold?

Again, YA is YA. If it wasn't, it wouldn't be called YA, be written with the tropes/cliches and sold to that very specific demographic.

Wrong, it's not a Twilight-style book.

Lost stars definitely is, its even admitted it. its an YA romance, that makes it Twilight.

I'm not talking about her other stuff, I'm taking about her Star Wars stuff and they are not Twilight-like books. That's a fact, just like it's a fact that Spider-Man is a superhero movie.

Its a fact that her whole career is based on Twilight clone novels, and that Lost Stars is one of them.

Your call, but you're missing out on a really great book. (It reads like a regular novel, not a novelization, if that makes any sense. We get into Jyn's head a lot which really adds a lot of meaning to the movie. Her relationship with her father is really well done.)

I'm only missing out on wasting time and money on a story I can just watch when I want to see it. Novelizations only exist to make money, in my opinion they don't add anything, and when there are only a certain amount of book slots avaliable, like with the SW GA books, they're outright harmful to the new canon.

Ouch. Did you see it? I will concede the first couple seasons were rough, but it found its feet. They had decent characterizations overall, did Apocalypse quite well, and was the first time that the Sentinels were actually a threat (this was before Days of Future Past did good Sentinels on the big screen).

Wrong. Evolution is arguably the most influential X-Men cartoon to date; the character X-23/Laura Kinney was an original character created specifically for this show. She was brought into the comics (basically utilizing an expanded version of her cartoon backstory), and has starred in her own ongoing series (including one right now) and will be appearing in the next X-Men movie, Logan, as one of the leads.

I saw enough of Evolution. It wasreally bad, and only existed because Kids WB (and Bruce Timm and/or Paul Dini have talked about this) got taken over by a nutjob who insisted that all kids shows on their network must star kids/teen characters. So, DC made Batman beyond and Marvel made X-Men evolution because of that. Batman beyond was mostly mediocre, and X-men evolution was generic junk. As for X-23, she may have shown up in the cartoon, but the core of the character comes from the comics. Its like how Rob Liefeld created deadpool, but without all the other writers the character would have been a bland, forgettable product of a mediocre product.

The blurb:

Doesn't sound much like my joke story.

It sounds like a story that could easily stick all the YA junk into it with really no effort.


It wasn't a Hunger Games-type story. Myth double busted.

Ahsoka was either Hunger Games or Twilight, or slight variations of those. No other option exists, regardless of whether you agree or not.

It matters to me. I did read the sample chapters posted online and so far, she's herself.

Jyn is a woman in her late 20a/early 30s, and from a GA product. If she's any younger and in a YA book, she's not "herself".


General means everyone, which encompasses YA, GA, what have you. It can do both. It doesn't need to limit itself to one.

Nope. General does not encompass "YA". YA is a genre that doesn't include anything but its own terrible style.

Sure sounds like an adult-targeted book to me. (I read a lot of GA Star Wars books in my teens. They are essentially the same as most YA books I've read, just a different size. The same's true today, from what I've read.)

GA books can be written by teens. They're just not written down to them specifically like YA books are. Really, I'd consider it embarassing for even teens to read YA, but its still a genre made for them, even if it is junk I would have found badly done and insulting when I was in its age range.


The Star Wars website said this about the novel when announcing it:

Doesn't look like the odds are in your favor.

That all looks like YA fodder to me.
 
Ahsoka was either Hunger Games or Twilight, or slight variations of those. No other option exists, regardless of whether you agree or not.

Complete and utter nonsense.

YA also include novels from 2016 such as Don't Get Caught by Kurt Dinan and Tales of Peculiar by Ransom Riggs, plus innumerable other novels in recent years and across the last century or so that are YA novels that are nothing like Hunger Games or Twilight. Those two are a popular, but only a segment of the total current YA produced in the present. Not every YA novel is romance, nor dystopian. There are other setting that don't include either of those genres of literature and plenty of young adult novels written that are thankfully not set in either of those two settings.

Star Wars is Science Fantasy. So that's what will be written in a YA Star Wars novel.
 
In no reality does the YA stuff have more claim to being real then the old EU stuff, but whatever.

That's not your call, it's LucasFilm's.

They're not treated as equally important.

How do you know that?

Not going out of the way to contradict some garbage from Star Wars: Twilight doesn't give Lost stars equal importance to Tarkin, Lords of the Sith, etc. It just means 1) they don't want to mess with the YA cash cow, and 2) nothing in the YA books is important enough to bother contradicting.

It means that Disney is spreading the story across multiple sources.

Outside of banning real books from telling certain stories in the same time period of some of the YA books, probably to spread the stories out more then anything, and giving a few unimportant references the YA stuff isn't important and doesn't contribute anything to the real SW stuff.

Rebel Rising's existence argue's otherwise.

Yes there is. Its called Lost Stars, a YA romance (aka Twilight book) from a woman who usually writes books that are even more blatantly Twilight clones.

So you're saying that an author can't write more than one style? That's not how the profession works.

I read Lost Stars. It's not a Twilight book. That's a fact about it's genre. Case closed.

I don't count "important" as connected to movies. What about stories with characters post RotJ (that aren't written by YA romance authors)? What about the Old Republic, either right before the fall or in the old KOTOR era? What about stories in any era with characters that aren't related to the movies, or with side characters? Tell some X-Wing type stories, give us some post ROTJ Lando, maybe a Boba Fett adventure or bring back some old EU characters like Talon Karde and Mara Jade. There is a universe of stuff, and the old EU sold books with it. They sold books with the major focus on characters never even hinted at in the movies, and made a profit doing it. That can all be important. Certainly more important and more varied then stuff about New republic politics or what Snap wexley is doing or making a book about the parts of Rogue One that didn't need elaboration.

A.) The new canon is only a few years old. Give it some time. B.) They have made books like the one's you're suggesting, just in YA (and comics).

Well, disqualifying the junior novelization writer...

I was comparing him to fellow junior novelization writers.

...and the Twilight cloner...

Since you've never read her, that's a pretty empty opinion.

...there are a few decent writers (although I can't speak for Freed, although I know some good authors make quick money with novelizations so I won't count that against him). Its too bad they don't really get to branch out. Miller got stuck with leftovers from Rebels, and the fact he made it tolerable honestly makes him more qualified to run Rebels then Filoni.

Of course not, Miller is a novelist, Filoni works in TV.

But, when your supposed "universally important" books are a crappy trilogy written by Wendig, they obviously have problems getting good writers.

That sounds like a marketing problem.

The old EU was great, with 90% of the books being at least good. Even the best new canon books (in my opinion that would be Tarkin and Lords of the Sith) don't measure up to the greatness of the EU. don't get me wrong, they'd both be solid entries in comparison to the old EU, but not top tier.

New canon is far younger than Legends, had yet sink to the depths of awfulness that Legends could, and has better consistency.

They're not even telling good stories across the board with the GA books...

Huh.

...and no YA books have good stories...

Wrong.

...so I definitely disagree with this.

Comics are doing okay, too, from what I've seen.

I watch a lot of animated tV, and Rebels is definitely garbage. Not quite "Teen Titans Go!" level, but its easily the worst SW cartoon (and I'm including Ewoks and Droids in that statement). Badly written (even for its target audsience of 5 year olds), terrible characters, and a pretty bad art style (although, to be fair, tCW didn't have a great style either, but it was better then Rebels).

Whatever, man.

Nope. the quality of the old EU was much more consistent, and the new canon's only "ground work" is the movies. Also, "internally consistent" doesn't really equal "good".

Legends went off the rails after New Jedi Order and was always hit and miss (and I say this as someone who does like Legends for what it is). In all honesty -- except for a few random novels -- the reboot has allowed me to find new Star Wars content that I enjoy.

I've seen enough feces to identify it fairly easily, and YA stuff has a very distinctive scent.
Since you've shown that you don't even understand what "YA" means, I doubt that.

No its not. Some low ranking person at the FX department managed to slip a few Rebels references in (well, either that or marketing people did) and someone stuck Saw in because they needed a character for that role and, again, it fit for marketing purposes.

Uh-huh.

I'd never read a book by a Twilight cloner.

So, your word is worth nothing.

Its the same quality...

Having the read the book, I can make a case to disprove that.

...and I'm sure it only doesn't have romance because Disney wouldn't let Grey make Leia fall in love with someone besides Han.

It's about politics.

Nope. YA is YA. It has variations in setting (like outer space or historical fiction or modern earth, etc), but that's just cosmetic.

You are factually wrong.

You can't tell me what to think of a book, and I don't have to read something to form an opinion on it. To think otherwise is ridiculous.

It is when you're making declarative statements about the subject in question. You has also shown that you have no idea what you're taking about, since you chronically misuse and misdefine the phrase "YA book."

I'm sure Filoni would claim to like the charater too, and he ruined her.

In your opinion, which may or may not reflect reality.

If the author really liked the character, they wouldn't have written a YA book with her.

Do you realize what an inane statement that is?

Again, YA is YA. If it wasn't, it wouldn't be called YA, be written with the tropes/cliches and sold to that very specific demographic.

Again you do not understand what a YA book is.

Lost stars definitely is, its even admitted it. its an YA romance, that makes it Twilight.

Factually wrong.

Its a fact that her whole career is based on Twilight clone novels, and that Lost Stars is one of them.

It is not. Case closed.

I'm only missing out on wasting time and money on a story I can just watch when I want to see it. Novelizations only exist to make money, in my opinion they don't add anything, and when there are only a certain amount of book slots avaliable, like with the SW GA books, they're outright harmful to the new canon.

You're loss.

I saw enough of Evolution. It wasreally bad, and only existed because Kids WB (and Bruce Timm and/or Paul Dini have talked about this) got taken over by a nutjob who insisted that all kids shows on their network must star kids/teen characters. So, DC made Batman beyond and Marvel made X-Men evolution because of that. Batman beyond was mostly mediocre, and X-men evolution was generic junk.

The Return of the Joker movie wasn't bad. The thing about Evolution, though, was that it depicted the first generation of X-Men students. Making them teens is actually faithful to the comics, since the original X-Men were teens. If you didn't like it, fair enough. I've seen bits and pieces of the old '90s X-Men cartoon and found it very awful, so obviously nothing appeals to everyone.

As for X-23, she may have shown up in the cartoon, but the core of the character comes from the comics. Its like how Rob Liefeld created deadpool, but without all the other writers the character would have been a bland, forgettable product of a mediocre product.

She was brought into the comics by the people who created her for the TV show. Also, it doesn't change the fact that the Evolution cartoon (positively) changed the franchise by creating X-23 in the first place. (Also, the character's basic backstory is the Evolution one.)

It sounds like a story that could easily stick all the YA junk into it with really no effort.
I will concede it is a little vague.

Ahsoka was either Hunger Games or Twilight, or slight variations of those. No other option exists, regardless of whether you agree or not.

Wrong, there are other options. I have read many of them myself. You are factually wrong in this case.

Jyn is a woman in her late 20a/early 30s, and from a GA product. If she's any younger and in a YA book, she's not "herself".

Since we also saw her as a child in the movies, you'll forgive me for not finding this convincing.

Nope. General does not encompass "YA".

Okay, then Star Wars is a franchise that includes both GA and YA offshoots.

YA is a genre that doesn't include anything but its own terrible style.

Once again, that's factually wrong.

GA books can be written by teens. They're just not written down to them specifically like YA books are. Really, I'd consider it embarassing for even teens to read YA, but its still a genre made for them, even if it is junk I would have found badly done and insulting when I was in its age range.

Whatever.

That all looks like YA fodder to me.

I'll tell you when I get to read it.
 
Ahsoka, from my understanding takes place a year or so following Order 66. Following how a former Padawan goes from "traitor to the Empire" to vigilante, to rebel agent.
 
Do I even have to ask which brick wall you're all yelling at in abject futility? Guys, seriously, he never listens and seems to thrive of the attention of being contrary. For the sake of your own sanity, just leave it be.

Ahsoka, from my understanding takes place a year or so following Order 66. Following how a former Padawan goes from "traitor to the Empire" to vigilante, to rebel agent.
You understand correctly.
There's a few flashbacks (including what must be a few small excerpts from the Siege of Mandalore scripts) but yeah, the bulk of the story begins around the first "Empire Day" and concludes a few months later at most. Certainly less than a year so there's plenty of Ahsoka story yet to tell. Like, a decade and a half, give or take.
 
Picked up Aftermath today, now that schoolwork will allow it. First Star Wars novel in a while so I'm looking forward to it :)
 
Rebel Rising's existence argue's otherwise.

It really doesn't. Rebel Rising will just as much fluff as everything else in YA. Just another poorly done story of some event in her life that means nothing, but works well enough to get the Young Adult crowd to buy the book.

So you're saying that an author can't write more than one style? That's not how the profession works.

I'm saying that when a writer has only written twilight clones (14 counting lost stars) and one GA SW book, they're a YA twilight clone author.

I read Lost Stars. It's not a Twilight book. That's a fact about it's genre. Case closed.

The case isn't closed, its your opinion. It might not follow the exact story beats of Twilight (I doubt it has an immortal vampire), but its an angsty teen romance book, aka a "Twilight" YA book.


A.) The new canon is only a few years old. Give it some time. B.) They have made books like the one's you're suggesting, just in YA (and comics).

The new canon comics range from bad (Kanan, Poe Dameron, Chewbacca, Han Solo) to pretty good (Star Wars, Darth Vader, Lando). But, while I'm a huge comic fan, books are a different thing. Getting a type of story in the comics is great, but its not a replacement for wanting those kinds of stories in the novels, too.

Since you've never read her, that's a pretty empty opinion.

My opinion of Claudia Grey is backed up by her own bibliography. Its about as solidly based in fact as you can get.

Of course not, Miller is a novelist, Filoni works in TV.

As a storyteller, Miller is superior in every aspect. Writers of books have written for TV very successfully before, and vice versa. I don't know how he'd be in producing or technical stuff, but from a writing/creative perspective Miller is much better then Filoni. He made a Rebels story that wasn't terrible. That should have gotten him an award all by itself.


New canon is far younger than Legends, had yet sink to the depths of awfulness that Legends could, and has better consistency.

The worst of the old EU, at least in the books (I didn't read all the old comics), was generally "meh" with a few scattered bad books. I don't recall a really terrible book, except for Traitor.


Legends went off the rails after New Jedi Order and was always hit and miss (and I say this as someone who does like Legends for what it is). In all honesty -- except for a few random novels -- the reboot has allowed me to find new Star Wars content that I enjoy.

I totally disagree. While the dark nest/joiner trilogy was very mediocre and stupid, and Legacy of the Force was ok to infuriating, overall they were still putting out mostly good to great stuff. The reboot has vastly reduced the number of new good Star Wars stories in my opinion.

Since you've shown that you don't even understand what "YA" means, I doubt that.

I understand YA fairly well. You don't have to agree with my opinion, but that doesn't mean I don't get YA. Its not like YA is difficult to understand.


So, your word is worth nothing.

Its worth as much as anyone elses :shrug:


Having the read the book, I can make a case to disprove that.

Of course you can, at least from your perspective, and that's fine. Like I said, having different opinions is fine. You can't disprove my opinion objectively, because opinions are subjective. But you can, of course, make an argument as to why you like Bloodlines or any other book that I don't like.

You are factually wrong.

I'm not any kind of "wrong" about YA. Its all (in my opinion) garbage with different coats of paint. In a franchise like SW, its junk and unimportant fluff. You don't have to agree, but that doesn't make me wrong.

It is when you're making declarative statements about the subject in question. You has also shown that you have no idea what you're taking about, since you chronically misuse and misdefine the phrase "YA book."

I use the term "YA Book" when talking about YA books. I've neither misused it or misdefined it.

Again you do not understand what a YA book is.

I understand all too well. I wish I didn't, but its inescapable.

Factually wrong.

Lost Stars is a angsty teen romance, aka a "Twilight" style YA book. Its not like it ever tried to hide that fact.

It is not. Case closed.

Lost Stars is an angsty teen romance, just like 95% of the authors work in general. IIt never pretends to be anything else. Case...reopened and overturned on appeal?

You're loss.

Nothing is lost by skipping a novelization, at least in my opinion. This is really subjective, though. If the SW novelizations didn't take up a valuable GA book slot, I wouldn't mind them. I wouldn't read them, but I'd be neutral toward them.

The Return of the Joker movie wasn't bad. The thing about Evolution, though, was that it depicted the first generation of X-Men students. Making them teens is actually faithful to the comics, since the original X-Men were teens. If you didn't like it, fair enough. I've seen bits and pieces of the old '90s X-Men cartoon and found it very awful, so obviously nothing appeals to everyone.

Its not faithful to the comics. The X-Men were never in high school, they were personally taught by Professor X. Actually, Iceman was the youngest X-Man at around 16 in X-Men #1, the rest were probably around 17-19 at that time. They didn't do the kinds of generic school stuff that X-Men evolution had (they had a bunch of creepy problems of their own, but that's a whole other thing). The villains were real villains, not some school bullies. Really, Evolution was nothing like the old X-Men series. Not that the original X-Men run was great (the Stan Lee stuff especially had problems), but Evolution wasn't better. I liked the 90s cartoon a lot, despite it having some flaws (for example, both it and Spider-Man TAS were severely restricted with language and violence, more then was even normal for a cartoon of that time).

Return of the Joker was probably the only really good thing to come from batman beyond.

She was brought into the comics by the people who created her for the TV show. Also, it doesn't change the fact that the Evolution cartoon (positively) changed the franchise by creating X-23 in the first place. (Also, the character's basic backstory is the Evolution one.)

X-23 didn't change the franchise, not even remotely. She's a good character that I like a lot, but the X-Men as a series would be fine without her.


Wrong, there are other options. I have read many of them myself. You are factually wrong in this case.

I don't believe that there are other options. All YA is some variation of Twilight/Hunger Games. That doesn't mean they're all either supernatural or distopian, but the "Angsty teen romance" or "teen drama with a more competent hero/heroine" styles are YA.

Okay, then Star Wars is a franchise that includes both GA and YA offshoots.

Its unfortunate, but accurate. You have the real stuff, made for general audiences, and the fluff they make to get a bit of extra money from the Twilight/Hunger Games crowds. I think they'd do better to just focus on good GA stuff, and things for little kids, but if there is a way to make money they're obviously going to take it. I just wish it didn't come at the expense of the normal GA stuff.
 
I have disagreed with pretty much everything you and Kirk have said in the last two or three pages, and most of that stuff is factually wrong.
I will agree that the movies are put above the books, but that is because Star Wars is a movie franchise with a few tie in books, comics, video games, and TV series. Everything is secondary to the movies, and that is the way it's supposed to be.
Not for all of us.
 
Seeing as how I just reviewed the YA section at the library, and saw several books that I would not classify as "angsty teenager/Twilight rip off" I will content that not all YA is cut from the same cloth.

And, yes, the books I liked were published from an author I know, and after Twilight/Hunger Games. Can't wait to get Ahsoka and Lost Stars now, after Aftermath.
 
Not for all of us.
What the hell does that even mean? If it weren't for the existence of Star Wars movies, there would be no Star Wars novels, period. By this simple fact, the novels are secondary to the movies. We are talking about a movie series which has brought in billions at the box office and practically represents American pop culture. Of course Disney wants this to be the vanguard of their SW machine. To pretend that novels that are only read by 1% of this audience are somehow more deserving to be front and centre is simply baffling. And the simple truth of the matter is Disney did not spend four billion dollars to buy the franchise just so they could control where to take the Yuuzhan Vong storyline or whatever.

Yeah, I get it, you're not happy the old EU got de-canonised. But Disney made the decision they did for very legitimate business reasons, which so far seem to be paying off for them.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top