The problem is, without reading a book, there's nothing to base your assessment on. You're not judging YA books in general, you're saying book X is bad. To make that statement, you have to have read the book, otherwise, you're making a statement without seeing the evidence, reviewing the book without reading it. That's not good reasoning.
(If you were approaching it as you don't think the story sounds interesting, dislike the author's style from past books, or such, and so were saying that you think it sounds bad, that's one thing. You've been saying that you know they're bad without having read any of the books that have come up. That's bad reasoning at best, and dishonest at worse -- since it implies that you have first-hand experience with the material that you do not have. This is the crux that I'm taking issue with. Do you understand where I'm coming from here?)
I get what you mean, but I don't think anyone is getting what I'm trying to say. I'm only stating things as my personal opinion. I'm not trying to be an impartial reviewer. What I think effects nobody but myself, and its not meant to sway other people's opinions. For me, when it comes to deciding what I like and dislike, having to read something to judge what I think about it is ridiculous (especially for YA stuff, my opinion on that is extremely solid). If I was trying to present my comments as a review, then I'd have to read it, but I'm not. My loathing of YA stuff is not objective and what I say is not meant to inform people. Its a personal opinion, and one I consider fully formed and unchanging. I don't care if anyone agrees, and it doesn't really matter if people accept it, because people's opinion on my opinion of YA books doesn't matter. I consider it a legitimate opinion formed off evidence I find compelling and my experience with YA stuff.. I get where people are coming from, I just don't agree with the idea of having to read every pile of trash because I can call something what it is.
I will never change my opinion on YA and kiddie stuff. Repeating "you need to read it to judge" or "listen to the people who have read it" is just as uncompelling the 10th time its posted as it was the first time, especially since I'm not talking about this from a position of being willing to change my mind. If some people like the YA/kiddie stuff, good. I'm fine with that. But no one can tell me what I think about YA stuff or individual books, regardless of their experience with them. If I was asking "What do people think of Lost Stars", then the opinions of people who had read the book would be important. But, I've never asked that. I know what I think of Lost Stars and other YA/kiddie junk. The opinions of other people, experienced or not, do not effect my opinion on this subject at all, and its getting a bit tedious to be honest. My opinion will always be: YA books (SW and in general) and kiddie stuff are trash and generally fluff, and I will never read them. That's my unchangeable, final opinion. I don't care what people who have read the stuff think of my opinion. I'm perfectly happy with my way of doing things. I have a lot of good or potentially good SW stuff to read, the books I consider garbage are stuff I don't give a second thought to when they're not being brought up. I am missing absolutely nothing, except some stuff I would find intolerable to try to read. That's not meant as a judgement on anyone else liking the things I don't.
Off-topic, and to hopefully calm things down, you mentioned that you liked Power Rangers. What do you think of the upcoming Power Rangers movie? I didn't watch the TV show, but the movie looks interesting, according to the trailers. I'm even curious about checking out the original show (after I can see the movie).
The movie looks interesting. I think it could go either way, honestly. It could be an enjoyable new take on the Power Rangers formula, or it could be a poorly done corporate cash grab (a lot of people are comparing the trailer to Chronicle, which I didn't like, and they're kind of right but I still see a lot of potential). I'm hopeful it will be entertaining, and I'm keeping an open mind.
As for the TV show, its very cheesy and I honestly have no idea what it would be like trying to get into as an adult as opposed to liking it as a kid and continuing to like it like I did. The original few seasons (the classic "Mighty Morphin" era) were very episodic, and the series is in general, but the seasons all have their own twists about them and they actually kind of have a long era that kind of caps off with the "Power Rangers: In Space" season. After that there really isn't much connecting the seasons, but there is a lot I enjoy, but I really have no idea what it would be like going into it with having a history with the show.