Filoni using them specifically is the middle finger, in my opinion. He knows what him/his show did to the books related to them. It was totally a victory lap for him. He won, a bunch of fans lost, and he's showing off. I seriously doubt he'd even know to ask for them specifically if it wasn't to screw over the fans, he probably heard complaints from fans of the book and got back at the angry fans by using Delta.
I'm confused. How is it a middle finger?
(Also, we know why Filoni put Delta Squad in; he like the video game. The books have nothing to do with anything. Besides, as I recall, the
Clone Commando novels weren't contradicted completely until the "Protocol 66"
Lost Missions arc, long after Delta Squad cameo.)
Most of my favorite SW books aren't big or Earth-shattering. But, they also aren't mostly pointless tie in stories to movies, either.
I don't know. In my experience, the "pointless tie-ins" have been more meaningful than the random books about new characters doing stuff that doesn't really connect with the movies and have no importance outside of themselves. Maybe it's like that dark side cave, you find what you bring with you?
When they only make 4-5 normal SW books a year, I want a bit more. Not necessarily "big" or "earth-shattering", but much more then a book that's just picking up scraps from a movie.
That is the definition of a tie-in; picking up scraps from a movie/TV show/whatever and making something interesting out of them.
They should use the real books to expand the universe outside of the movies.
All the books expand the universe in one way or another( hence why it's an "
expanded universe") and all of them are "real" (excusing the parody and Legends reprints).
...and if a direct tie in isn't written by the movie's writer and overseen by the producers/director (which I don't think has ever happened)...
Excusing
Catalyst, Rian Johson (episode 8's director) helped shape the plot of
Bloodlines. George Lucas gave Terry Brooks the Sith backstory for the
Phantom Menace novelization, wrote the prologue to the
Revenge of the Sith novelization (if I recall correctly), and was extensively involved in the editing of it.
According to author Matthew Stover:
Though I did not personally watch him do it, I received from LFL a Word document of Revenge of the Sith with Mr Lucas' edits, which was distinct from the edits I'd already gotten from Sue Rostoni and Howard Roffman and the rest of the LFL crew, and this document was edited in such a detailed fashion that even individual words had been struck off and his preferred replacements inserted, as well as some passages wholly excised and some dialogue replaced with the dialogue from the screenplay. If that's not line-editing, I don't know what is.
What's in that book is there because Mr. Lucas wanted it to be there. What's not in that book is not there because Mr. Lucas wanted it gone.
Period.
So, it has happened, and frankly, I wouldn't dismiss it unless there is good reason to (like the continuity reboot did with the novelizations).
But, a direct tie-in/prequel to a movie that isn't made by the movie makers is really worthless in my opinion. It doesn't effect anything, the movie won't acknowledge it and for all we know the film makers have completely different ideas about the characters.
How do you mean "acknowledge," since there are cases where that happens, however retroactively. Rey refers to having flown ships before, from
Before the Awakening, for example. Legends did the same.
Well, since Disney isn't stupid enough to make a book, that probably less then 10% of the main stream audience will ever read, required reading for their huge blockbuster movie, I'd take that article with a grain of salt.
Personally, I'd trust the people who made it to have a better idea of how useful the book is than you or me.
Presumably, it'll be one of those things where you can see the movie without reading the book, but things that are just throwaway lines will have more meaning, since you know the story behind them, or you'll have a better understanding of why the characters act like how they do, since you know some of the major events that got them to this point in life. So, not required reading, but one that'll enhance your experience at the movies.
Speaking for myself, after reading that description,
Catalyst is not only looking like a really good read, I'm also thinking that it looks like one of the most worthwhile books since the reboot. Even factoring out the movie, it looks like an interesting story.