I'll admit, I'm no engineer but that design is sexy.
I guess that ST XII's Engineering set, if that film will have one, could be anything; they could just use the excuse that in XI, the set wasn't yet completed (the ship *was* brand new after all).![]()
I think you have given the writers of Star Trek XII the answer.![]()

It doesn't look unfinished. How would you finish it other than putting up some walls? It looks like a 20th century brewery. It doesn't look like it's part of the ship at all.
It looked like a giant industrial facility dedicated to the production of massive amounts of electrical power and the processing of volatile chemicals and/or life support materials.
It was pretty much due to lack of budget, expect to see something closer tot he original production design paintings:
![]()
![]()
For me a Set failure was in STAR TREK 2009 movie. The Enterprise NCC-1701 Main Engineering Set.
Odd that you mention an iPhone as I was just thinking of the Personal Access Display Device (P.A.D.D.) and the Apple iPad circa 2010.Star Trek technology is clean and tidy and functionality is hidden inside the form. It's like the difference between a current BMW motor and one from the year 1900. Between an iPhone and the earliest cellphone.
Odd that you mention an iPhone as I was just thinking of the Personal Access Display Device (P.A.D.D.) and the Apple iPad circa 2010.Star Trek technology is clean and tidy and functionality is hidden inside the form. It's like the difference between a current BMW motor and one from the year 1900. Between an iPhone and the earliest cellphone.

^Except the Star Trek PADD has storage space for only one file, and you need a whole stack of them to get anythine done. "Sophisticated, clean and tidy" it ain't.
The PADD existed a long time before the iPad, and it was sophisticated, clean and tidy. Now the iPad is there, and Trek's fictional technology needs to catch up to become again sophisticated, clean and tidy. Just like they have digital and holographic displays on the bridge, when there were still paper printers in TOS.It looked like a giant industrial facility dedicated to the production of massive amounts of electrical power and the processing of volatile chemicals and/or life support materials.
It looked like a giant industrial facility dedicated to the production of massive amounts of beer.
What difference does that make? Fission reactors don't look all that different, especially on naval vessels.Posting photographs of a real world fusion reactor that looks like a mess is pointless. Why? Fusion technology is EXPERIMENTAL.
At least, it used to be. There's no logical reason why it HAS to, though.Star Trek technology is clean and tidy and functionality is hidden inside the form.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.