• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek TMP: The Happy Meal

They heavily promoted all the strange alien races in the film -- I was pretty disappointed most of them were only in the background of one scene for about 10 seconds.


TMP aliens by Therin of Andor, on Flickr

Well, strangely enough, "Star Wars" gets a lot of mileage with its action figures of hundreds of obscure aliens that are given personal names, species, back stories, and yet they are often barely glimpsed in live-action scenes.
 
That is very true! I have seen the figures myself. But back to happy meals-they were a favorite when I was growing up in the 80s! I was so sad when I eventually outgrew them!
 
Well, strangely enough, "Star Wars" gets a lot of mileage with its action figures of hundreds of obscure aliens that are given personal names, species, back stories, and yet they are often barely glimpsed in live-action scenes.

Damn straight! I remember as a kid seeing the OT hundreds of times, and then one day I bought a collection of plastic figurines that came with information for each one. There was a bio about the red astromech droid called R5-D4 that gave so many details it blew my mind. He barely had an appearance in the movie, he was barely a prop, and yet he got a small paragraph of back story.

Personally, I've never been able to buy into this for Star Wars though. If it wasn't significant in the movies and didn't leave anything to question, why should I care? Especially if it's just for an animatronic extra.
 
The marketing tie-in that I always wanted to see but never did was the Kraft Jet-Puffed Marshmallows one.

If you sent Kraft some cash, you could get a replica "marshmelon" dispenser from ST5:



Dakota Smith
 
The marketing tie-in that I always wanted to see but never did was the Kraft Jet-Puffed Marshmallows one.

My US penpal got me one at the time. Contains army mess-kit style plastic cutlery.

You want bizarre Trek collectibles?

Here is:
Trek bizarre by Therin of Andor, on Flickr

Clockwise, from top: A "United Federation of Planets" beanie bear; "The Penetrator" glow-in-the-dark starship condom and hexagonal box; a zombies "Star Trek" patch; "Star Wrek" VHS candy; and (centre) the Kraft "marshmelon" dispenser and plastic cutlery from "Star Trek V: The Final Frontier".
 
Last edited:
Well, strangely enough, "Star Wars" gets a lot of mileage with its action figures of hundreds of obscure aliens that are given personal names, species, back stories, and yet they are often barely glimpsed in live-action scenes.

Damn straight! I remember as a kid seeing the OT hundreds of times, and then one day I bought a collection of plastic figurines that came with information for each one. There was a bio about the red astromech droid called R5-D4 that gave so many details it blew my mind. He barely had an appearance in the movie, he was barely a prop, and yet he got a small paragraph of back story.

Personally, I've never been able to buy into this for Star Wars though. If it wasn't significant in the movies and didn't leave anything to question, why should I care? Especially if it's just for an animatronic extra.

As a kid, even though I had not seen the movie, I remember being really enthused by the Weetabix cut-out characters. They featured a few of the background aliens as well. I was gutted that I never found or swapped an Uhura card. Looking back I don't think Chapel or Rand got Weetabix cards, which was a bit harsh. If tehy had produced another six or so they would have had a decent range.

I do think the Trek franchise fumbled the ball a bit. The reluctance to spend money on alien make-up in subsequent movies did limit their merchandising options. Children want villains for their heroes to fight and the Trek franchise never gave them that. Had they produced a Klingon Captain and two Klingon warriors and/or a Romulan equivalent plus Tholians, Gorn etc. The 70's figures might have gone further. Presumably it was the licence holders' fault if they didn't sell the rights to produce wider characters from the series.
 
As a kid, even though I had not seen the movie, I remember being really enthused by the Weetabix cut-out characters.

I only found out about these a few years ago, and my first three-in-one uncut card purchase from eBay was the Scotty/Andorian Man/Uhura card, bought for one obvious reason. What I loved was that the scale was a fairly good fit for the "Punch-out USS Enterprise Bridge" cardboard model put out by Pocket Books!

They featured a few of the background aliens as well.
Last year, I located a full, but cut up, set, giving me all eighteen character cards. The alien ambassadors featured were Andorian Man, Andorian Woman, Betelgeusian, Rigellian, Megarite, Arcturian, Shamin Priest, plus the male Vulcan Master and Klingon Captain.

Children want villains for their heroes to fight and the Trek franchise never gave them that. Had they produced a Klingon Captain and two Klingon warriors and/or a Romulan equivalent plus Tholians, Gorn etc. The 70's figures might have gone further. Presumably it was the licence holders' fault if they didn't sell the rights to produce wider characters from the series.
Well, the old 8" Megos did do the Klingon in an early wave and then brown Gorn in Klingon uniform, followed by Bele of Cheron, a Romulan, a Talosian, Disco Mugato, a rogue Andorian, a combo quasi Ruk/puppet Balok figure and an original-to-Mego Neptunian, but sales kept dropping.

And, in 1989 and beyond, Kenner(?) encountered a bizarre phenomenon with their "Batman" lines. Although the original plan was to do all the villains, as each movie or animated episode came out, sales of the Joker, Bob the Goon, Penguin and Catwoman were dismal. Suddenly, the hot sellers were Batman in a range of specialist Batsuits that had never even appeared onscreen. They watched kids playing, and they thought nothing of making Infrared Batman fight Arctic Batsuit or another Batman - and actually preferred variations on Batmen than completing their sets with Riddler, Two-Face, Mr Freeze, Poison Ivy, Bane, etc.
 
Children want villains for their heroes to fight and the Trek franchise never gave them that. Had they produced a Klingon Captain and two Klingon warriors and/or a Romulan equivalent plus Tholians, Gorn etc. The 70's figures might have gone further. Presumably it was the licence holders' fault if they didn't sell the rights to produce wider characters from the series.
Well, the old 8" Megos did do the Klingon in an early wave and then brown Gorn in Klingon uniform, followed by Bele of Cheron, a Romulan, a Talosian, Disco Mugato, a rogue Andorian, a combo quasi Ruk/puppet Balok figure and an original-to-Mego Neptunian, but sales kept dropping.

And, in 1989 and beyond, Kenner(?) encountered a bizarre phenomenon with their "Batman" lines. Although the original plan was to do all the villains, as each movie or animated episode came out, sales of the Joker, Bob the Goon, Penguin and Catwoman were dismal. Suddenly, the hot sellers were Batman in a range of specialist Batsuits that had never even appeared onscreen. They watched kids playing, and they thought nothing of making Infrared Batman fight Arctic Batsuit or another Batman - and actually preferred variations on Batmen than completing their sets with Riddler, Two-Face, Mr Freeze, Poison Ivy, Bane, etc.

Oh dear, modern children have no imagination. My He-man needed Skeletor. My Action Man needed his Space Pirate. Having said that, we also had lots of fun fighting dinosaur toys.
 
Oh dear, modern children have no imagination. My He-man needed Skeletor. My Action Man needed his Space Pirate. Having said that, we also had lots of fun fighting dinosaur toys.

It has nothing to do with "modern children". Some kids (and adults) are completists and must have one-of-everything. My Mum hated when a new line of breakfast cereal toys started up. (The first few lines had eight characters. Later lines had sixteen, twenty four, etc.) Similarly, kids are still using imagination when they have a created team of eight differently-coloured Batmen or Spider-Men. Others don't care if a set is incomplete.

But we also thought nothing of doubling up on characters. We used to add cotton wool hair to create a female version of the same character, or the spare became an evil twin or doppleganger until we swapped him for one we didn't have.
 
Oh dear, modern children have no imagination. My He-man needed Skeletor. My Action Man needed his Space Pirate. Having said that, we also had lots of fun fighting dinosaur toys.

It has nothing to do with "modern children". Some kids (and adults) are completists and must have one-of-everything. My Mum hated when a new line of breakfast cereal toys started up. (The first few lines had eight characters. Later lines had sixteen, twenty four, etc.) Similarly, kids are still using imagination when they have a created team of eight differently-coloured Batmen or Spider-Men. Others don't care if a set is incomplete.

But we also thought nothing of doubling up on characters. We used to add cotton wool hair to create a female version of the same character, or the spare became an evil twin or doppleganger until we swapped him for one we didn't have.

I used to use the various Princess Leia figures as different female characters (although havng Kate McRae also helped) because Lucas wasn't (and still isn't) big on using female characters and we had nothing else to work with!
 
Somehow, I see this scenario playing out:

The kid gets the "Star Trek Meal" and is excited about a movie based on the cool images on the box and the toy inside. Kid gets parents to take him to the movie. Kid falls asleep 15 minutes in.

WTF?...I was 12 and at the first viewing and NEVER fell asleep...:wtf:

Well, la-de-fucking-da. I didn't realize I was talking specifically about you. I'll keep that in mind when I post something overly general and silly that I'm posting about Captain Mike and that he might get overly defensive about it. Thank you for enlightening me to the ways of the internet.

Anyway, you were still getting Happy Meals when you were 12?
 
Somehow, I see this scenario playing out:

The kid gets the "Star Trek Meal" and is excited about a movie based on the cool images on the box and the toy inside. Kid gets parents to take him to the movie. Kid falls asleep 15 minutes in.

WTF?...I was 12 and at the first viewing and NEVER fell asleep...:wtf:

Well, la-de-fucking-da. I didn't realize I was talking specifically about you. I'll keep that in mind when I post something overly general and silly that I'm posting about Captain Mike and that he might get overly defensive about it. Thank you for enlightening me to the ways of the internet.

Anyway, you were still getting Happy Meals when you were 12?

I saw it for the first time when they showed the extended version on TV (was that 83?) so I would have been 12 too. I have to say that I was enthralled, although I was young enough that I don't even notice that my beloved Janice was the one doing her bit to reduce the Vulcan overpopulation problem until the second viewing.
 
I was 8 or 9 when I first saw it in the theater and watched the SLV on TV whenever I could and never fell asleep and always wanted more of it. I was sad each time it ended.
 
Somehow, I see this scenario playing out:

The kid gets the "Star Trek Meal" and is excited about a movie based on the cool images on the box and the toy inside. Kid gets parents to take him to the movie. Kid falls asleep 15 minutes in.

Generally speaking you are talking about ALL kids here, WHEN do they achieve not being called a "kid" in your eyes????:confused:

Well, la-de-fucking-da. I didn't realize I was talking specifically about you. I'll keep that in mind when I post something overly general and silly that I'm posting about Captain Mike and that he might get overly defensive about it. Thank you for enlightening me to the ways of the internet.

Anyway, you were still getting Happy Meals when you were 12?
SO????? I was 12 yes, but even back in that time STAR TREK was my favorite television show (and still is). So la-de-fucking-da that I had my mother buy me one because it was Star Trek orientated.
^ That's fair. At least you are not getting defensive.

No, you are the one getting defensive about my post that I was just responding that I never fell asleep. And I was a kid...oh wait...No I wasn't I was 12.:rolleyes:
 
you were still getting Happy Meals when you were 12?

Considering that Happy Meals were a fairly new concept at the time (I don't think they became a menu item Down Under until the 80s - kids could order a "Junior Burger with fries and a drink"), there wouldn't have been too much of a stigma. In any case, I've met quite a few unmarried adult Star Trek fans who have a full set of TMP "Happy Meal" boxes and toys, who were all much older than 12 when they bought them.

As an adult myself, I had to buy a series of Aussie exclusive "Star Wars" KFC "Kids' Meals" in the late 90s, so I could send the toys to a US penpal.
 
In any case, I've met quite a few unmarried adult Star Trek fans who have a full set of TMP "Happy Meal" boxes and toys, who were all much older than 12 when they bought them.

It would've been so much better if you would have said this...

In any case, I've met quite a few Star Trek fans who have a full set of TMP "Happy Meal" boxes and toys, who were all much older than 12 when they bought them.

The "unmarried adult" just perpetuates the stereotype that we've all been living in our parents basements for the last forty years masturbating to Star Trek. :p

Must be funny to take and downgrade someone with the help of others since from previous posts that you had such a unhappy childhood. :)

A funny barb is a funny barb. Lighten up, Francis. :p
 
The "unmarried adult" just perpetuates the stereotype that we've all been living in our parents basements for the last forty years masturbating to Star Trek. :p

And in your next breath, you tell someone else to "lighten up"? :eek:

Sometimes stereotypes are stereotypes because they happen to be... true.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top