Bit of a burden for the actor by calling that character Kor. He could have just been a new character and it would have made no difference to the plot. But no the memberberries must be harvested.

Yeah. Totally agree.Bit of a burden for the actor by calling that character Kor. He could have just been a new character and it would have made no difference to the plot. But no the memberberries must be harvested.
Apologies. It just felt like two.gawd, they made a second part to that turd?!
(Hint: “These Are the Voyages” is just one episode.)
Fans refuse now.Can't believe the whining about Kor's make-up. Trek fans used to think up creative explanations for this stuff.
Kor never had the Augment virus thing. He was always an old bumpy head.
During Errand of Mercy he's undergone surgery to lead a crack troop of smoothies in the invasion of Organia.
After that he reverts to his natural state.
Easy.
So, I was actually curious about this, which episodes are considered the two back-to-back worst (I also like looking at things like which back-to-back episodes had the biggest jump in quality from really bad to really good). I went and look at the IMDB scores, which while I don't think are the best rating system in the world, is a decent resource for getting a general idea of episode trends.These last two eps have got to be in the running for the worst back-to-back episode combo in Trek history.
Yeah, honestly, props to Babs Olusanmukon for delivering that bizarre speech with a straight face. Occasionally I try to imagine just dropping in for a random episode of this show as a casual viewer. In this one, I would find myself trying to figure out why the ship's doctor is casually confessing to a mass slaughter, seemingly out of nowhere, right at the end.The reveal of M'Benga's additional murder spree is wild though, it's such a weird part of his character.
A lot of time spent going basically nowhere. I think the word "filler" gets thrown around too freely but in this case, it's kind of applicable.The B-Plot, I must say, I thought was useless.
It may not be indicative of much in the bigger picture, really. ImdB ratings are notoriously subject to passing fads.Again, I think comparing shows like this is a bit of comparing apples to oranges, but it does show that there's a general discontent with this season thus far.
Comparison will always rob you of joy.Again, I think comparing shows like this is a bit of comparing apples to oranges, but it does show that there's a general discontent with this season thus far.
Nope.These last two eps have got to be in the running for the worst back-to-back episode combo in Trek history.
Don’t forget Tom Paris and Nick Locarno (shout out to LD for making good hay outta that). I think it would have been great if they had Romijn play both Una and Chapel while doing the voice of the computer. I mean they like to brag about their big VFX budgets…go wild.Yeah, you know, TOS never explained how Number One's doppelganger came to serve on the very same ship.
Never could take the series seriously after that tremendously lazy canon FAIL!
Or just not acknowledge it in the tribble episode.All they had to do was keep the 3 TOS Klingons smooth headed
I disagreeNeither have the swagger to match up with the versions of the characters we see in TOS and DS9.
There was literally no reason at all to do this. The design of Klingons evolving between periods of Trek is not a thing of interest to the bulk of the audience, even an audience as nerdy as Trek's. DS9 treated it like a non-issue that did not require retconning because that's what it was.All they had to do was keep the 3 TOS Klingons smooth headed
Not according to Enterprise. They retconned the retcon being a retcon.The writers are just ignoring the Enterprise episodes that explained it. They were completely unnecessary, the ridges on Klingons in TMP was a retcon.
Which they did with the passing joke that was all it needed.They had to address it in "Tribble-ations",
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.