You have that, and you also have Star Wars talking about light speed only. Warp is faster than light. Plus, they rarely talk about time as you point out. I always got the impression that the galaxy is smaller and Star Wars doesn't use realistic distances. So I wouldn't go that far.
Words and labels are just those. Words. Easily interchangeable. Instead of saying "lightspeed" or "warp" the writers could have said potato speed or moving at the speed of brown. These terms are meaningless in such discussions.
Instead the only way to accurately compare the two is to look for units of measurement that can be transposed between the two franchises. Common measurements like sleep/wake cycles, eating cycles, etc...
There was a website that I've since lost track of (it may not exist any more) that went into such details. It compared the destructive force of a Star Destroyer vs. the Enterprise when facing the same or similar target. We see star destroyers destroying asteroids in Empire. We've seen the Enterprise target and destroy asteroids. That would be a valid comparison point.
Another example is telepathic distance. The Force lets someone touch minds and implant thoughts over a distance. Vulcan mind-melds are limited to touch (except for Sarek and Michael. And that one time Spock was on the Yang/Khom planet). There is another equal data point comparison.
Yes, Star Wars calls it light speed but light speed can take the Millennium Falcon from the outer rim of the galaxy to the heart of the Empire in such a short time that the passengers need not sleep or eat a meal. Light speed can get Palpatine from Coruscant to Mustafar before Anakin died of his injuries. Light speed is clearly faster than the speed of light.