We need Prince of Space to deal with Vadic.
Raffi: We're saved everyone! Captain Worf's here and he'll deal with Vadic!We need Prince of Space to deal with Vadic.
Which may indicate that Beverly felt this was something she had to do herself, for whatever reason.
A true warrior does not dwell on the past.Raffi: We're saved everyone! Captain Worf's here and he'll deal with Vadic!
Worf: You should know that I now prefer pacifism to combat.
Raffi: But you literally just beheaded a Ferengi gangster not even days ago!
Riker: We're all going to die.
What makes me suspicious is that she's still trying to be a freelance doctor, galactic hero etc. If the circumstances really were that bad, bluntly her forntier medicine routine should've been the first to be thrown out the airlock and she should've entered into some sort of witness protection program, or literally just go into one of those many isolated planets that so many "lonely scientists" hide on so easily (there's a whole writeup about that at https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/cliches1.htm )I strongly suspect that we're going to find out some plot device that's related both to the agenda of Vadic's faction and to whatever secret is being hidden about Jack which will also have obliged Beverly to cut off her friends and keep Jack a secret from Jean-Luc.
Picard grapples with an explosive, life-altering revelation, while the Titan and her crew try to outmaneuver a relentless Vadic in a lethal game of nautical cat and mouse. Meanwhile, Raffi and Worf uncover a nefarious plot from a vengeful enemy Starfleet has long since forgotten.
That last part makes it sound like that maybe the attack on the starfleet recruitment was not connected to Vadic, at least not directly
I think there is potential there, and I could be wrong, but I don't think the thematic questions is "What if Picard was a father?" but what if he wasn't able to be the father he wanted to be? He knows what he didn't want to be, like with his dad, but he still has to wrestle with that question of "How do I reconcile from not being able to be this father figure?"So we're hitting territory that in some ways has already been thematically explored. "What if Jean-Luc Picard was a father?" is very well-trod territory by this point. What makes "Disengage" work is that it's mediated through the decades-long relationship of Jean-Luc and Beverly. That I think will keep this from feeling too repetitive, but I do think the fact that "What if Jean-Luc Picard was a father?" has been so well-explored on a thematic and emotional level (if not on the literal plot level) is gonna be a hurdle for the writing this season to overcome.
And maybe Beverly makes a mistake in her choice and she has to atone for that, both with her son and with Picard? That could be interesting too.I suppose this will all be explained (at least I hope so but you never know with the non-explanation of Q's death last year) soon enough, but the fact she seemingly willingly chose a lifestyle that brought out the worst in her son is already a huge knock against her in my book. In retrospect I'm wondering if Raffi's choosing her "I'm so important that my work saving the galaxy is more important than my son" was foreshadowing of this
I suppose this will all be explained (at least I hope so but you never know with the non-explanation of Q's death last year)
soon enough, but the fact she seemingly willingly chose a lifestyle that brought out the worst in her son
So an aside from another forum: It's a bit weird how this season is treating the exit from Federation space as some sort of big deal.
Mind you, this isn't the first time this has happened - other Kurtzman Trek shows have treated it like it's a big deal to exit Federation space before. But I just don't get it, because all of the past shows repeatedly had the ship go into non-controlled territory, as long as it didn't cross into a neutral zone or something.
Yup. As Shaw notes "No cavalry." They have detoured off their assigned orders, which means no one knows where they are or are able to provide any meaningful support.I mean, is a big deal if your deployment orders weren't to exit Federation space or didn't pre-authorize such an exit. It wasn't a big deal for the Enterprise or Enterprise-D because their deployment orders were to go into and out of Federation space on a regular basis.
The things is, Starfleet trained for scenarios that allowed for Starfleet captains to leave Fed space when civilians are in distress. Shaw's dilemma is literally a real life Kobayashi Maru exactly, in fact he's not even violating the Neutral Zone treaty the simulated Kobayashi Maru had.I mean, is a big deal if your deployment orders weren't to exit Federation space or didn't pre-authorize such an exit. It wasn't a big deal for the Enterprise or Enterprise-D because their deployment orders were to go into and out of Federation space on a regular basis.
To see what the officer's breaking point is. Apparently for Shaw the breaking point and his willingness to risk his crew is finding out that the civilian in question is the son of Picard, a man he doesn't even like. Vadic's right, I'm surprised he's still functional with a psych like that.My understanding was that the Kobayashi Maru has always been more of a psychological test and lesson rather than a "do this" lesson.
Have you met Starfleet officers?To see what the officer's breaking point is. Apparently for Shaw the breaking point and his willingness to risk his crew is finding out that the civilian in question is the son of Picard, a man he doesn't even like. Vadic's right, I'm surprised he's still functional with a psych like that.![]()
![]()
The Enterprise was also a "starship, a very special type of space ship." There are only "12 like her in the fleet."
Starfleet in the 25th century has moved away from the Swiss Army Knife approach for starships, and far more specialized, with the Inquiry a combat vessel and the California class a support vessel and the Neo-Constitution and explorer class. And it fits with the less militaristic approach of Starfleet post Dominion War.
The Vau N'akat villains in ST:Prodigy are compelling. And Oh in Picard S1 was OK as far as motives and actions goes, though she wasn't very much developped (the male half of the twins was a pretty good reluctant villain, as well, though here too the series dropped him prematurely).Vadic is one dimensional as anything. Every villain in trek has a conflict of good/evil, she just looks like and sounds like a panto villain.
There hasn't been a compelling Villain in any of the nu trek shows/movies at all. Even Shinzon and Ruafo were light years ahead of what we have now
True, being well armed & ready to handle anything is a useful aspect as well as having the full science capabilities.Well, moved away from The Swiss Army Knife approach is different from letting their important assets to be knocking down by non government entities like bounty hunters, pirates, rebels, etc like Scimitar and Shrike. Because it will tarnish the dignity and image of the United Federation of Planets as a governmental entity. If they can't protect their citizens from bandits, rebels, space pirates, bounty hunters raid, then what is the point for the planets out there to join Federation?
Being a peace lover and pacifist doesn't mean that they have to let their starships to be outgunned by those ragtag entities like bounty hunters, rebels, pirates, etc.
Actually it is a humiliation for Starfleet, and Federation as a whole, if one of their best Starship can't handle a rogue bounty hunter with their ragtag starship, and must surrender in their term because they are outgunned by those outlaw.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.