Watch World Enough and Time, with George Takei, and you tell me. :troll:

I've seen some of the concept work for the unrealized series and I was definitely not impressed.
I can't imagine the original Star Trek crew without Spock.
Do you think if Paramount had greenlit Phase II, it could have killed Star Trek forever?
What the heck does a 21st century fan production have to do with what would have happened if a proposed series had been made in 1978?Watch World Enough and Time, with George Takei, and you tell me. :troll:
Obviously season two would have been alot better.
Phase II wouldn't have worked so well for a late-70's TV audience. That was a time when the national mood was very cynical. A TV show displaying a positive Human future wouldn't have been overly believable or interesting to the audiences of the time.

As the series progressed, the ratings began to decline, even though the show still consistently won its coveted Sunday evening timeslot.
In mid-April 1979, ABC executives canceled the still strongly-rated show. Some believed that it was a failed attempt by ABC to position its hit comedy Mork & Mindy into a more lucrative timeslot.
Obviously season two would have been alot better.
According to the Reeves-Stevens book on the aborted series, Decker was designed as a Kirk replacement to help reduce the hefty salary of Shatner. Apparently, Kirk's role would've been reduced or he would be written off. In any case, Decker would've stepped up to the captain's chair as the new lead of the series.
So season two might have developed a different crew dynamic with stories more focused on a new Big Three: Decker, Xon, and Ilia.
Who knows what might have been? It never happened so we'll never know. Aesthetically speaking: I'm not sure how successful the sixties costumes would have been in the seventies - feminism was in full swing at the time and Ilia looks strangely unsettling in that publicity shot of her in a command gold mini-skirt...
...come to think of it: there's a shot of Xon in a starfleet uni that looks a bronzey-brown colour. What's up with that...?
Even if Phase II had good ratings, if Battlestar Galactica is anything to go by then it would've been cancelled because of how expensive it was. Why make a cost prohibitive space show when you can make a cheap sitcom instead?
One of the key differences between TNG and Phase II is that TNG was syndicated and would air just before primetime programming. In my area, it was Saturdays at 7:00. It was out of the way. Phase II wouldn't have that advantage and would be up against whatever was popular in the late-'70s. ABC would've taken away a lot of Phase II's intended demographic.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.