The Klingon Raptor was from "Enterprise."
That's right, a 22nd century ship has an identical in all plus name 24th century reincarnation. Of course, the Klingons are notorious for this.![]()
In the vanilla blandness of the future, there is only technological stagnancy.
Plus: WH40K joke.
Plus: WH40K joke.
I dunno whether I wanna play this or Stargate online.
http://www.examiner.com/x-5942-Okla...Champions-Online-offers-lifetime-subscriptionLifetime Subscriptions come with:
Access to the Star Trek Online Closed Beta, beginning later this year!
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/champions-offers-USD200-lifetime-subsThese deals are only available until the end of August - just before the game launches - and come with a number of incentives. Both lifetime and six-month subscribers get guaranteed access to the Star Trek Online closed beta
Not counting the cost of the game itself, lifetime subs cost $199.99
Is it ironic that I wish Online had more established classes (Steamrunner, Sabre, Galaxy, Ambassador, etc etc) while being disappointed that the designs of the new classes are too derivative and uninspired?
Is it ironic that I wish Online had more established classes (Steamrunner, Sabre, Galaxy, Ambassador, etc etc) while being disappointed that the designs of the new classes are too derivative and uninspired?
No Galaxy???? No Ambassador??? Say it ain't so!
Is it ironic that I wish Online had more established classes (Steamrunner, Sabre, Galaxy, Ambassador, etc etc) while being disappointed that the designs of the new classes are too derivative and uninspired?
No Galaxy???? No Ambassador??? Say it ain't so!
Well, we don't know yet for sure, but all the screenshots we've had of Starfleet vessels have refitted Akiras and Mirandas, along with uninspired new classes. However, I'm willing to bet that we won't have many of the previously established classes this time around.
as a Star Trek fan that also plays World of Warcraft religiously, im kinda disappointed in the direction they are taking this MMORPG. personally, i hate the fact that they are going to a time period that was never covered by any Star Trek story. basically they are just using a familar setting, but creating their own story. thats not what i want out of my cup of Star Trek games.
personally, i would have preferred that the game start just after the events of the launch of the Enterprise-B. there is a relative peace to the galaxy. the factions can still be Federation vs Klingon cause im sure there were still a few boarder skirmishes going on there (much like vanilla-WoWs story between the horde and alliance).
big stories can be madeup there to give epic goals. the story can then work its way up to the first expansion pack.... the Battle of Narendra III and the loss of the Enterprise C. this expansion pack can include a new playable faction in the Romulans (think of it as the Death Knight Hero class where new characters start at a higher level). The federation and klingons never truely merged anyway but they start to work a little more together.
that can lead up to the biggest and probably most signifcant story in ST - Best of Both Worlds. another expansion pack includes the invasion of the borg as a week long universe event (imagine the klingons and romulans sending help to wolf 359). the rest of the expansion plays out with stories similar to TNG episodes, the founding of DS9 and the wormhole.
next expansion brings in the dominion war and so on....
thats how id like to see this game played out.
but ill more then likely still pick this one up anyway
So you hate that they are going to a time period not covered on screen...yet you want them to set it in a different time period not covered on screen.
Poor game designers, they just can't win.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.