• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek Died Today

Status
Not open for further replies.

waynehead

Ensign
Red Shirt
It was beaten to a bloody pulp, rendered senseless and unimportant, reformed and shaped into a more pleasing shape, and fed to the horde of groundlings who'll gladly eat it up.

I just got back from seeing it.

It was bloody awful. Technically proficient, but conceptually something more like an abortion. A half idea. A "what if?" gone way too far. And a perversion of the brand's original intent. JJ Abrams would've been better off giving the finger to the creative talent, writers/producers, and fans of the series. That would've been much quicker and would've saved a lot of money which was instead invested in a pile of garbage.

Don't let me stop you, I know you have to see it. I know you think I'm crazy, or a geek gone wild, or something like that. Even after seeing it most of you will still hold that opinion of my perspective.

But IMO Star Trek, as we knew it, is dead.
 
"THE KING IS DEAD" :(

"LONG LIVE THE KING" :)

Just a matter of perspective.
The new Trek is alive and well, better than the old dead Trek
 
But IMO Star Trek, as we knew it, is dead.

Good. Throw some dirt over the corpse and let's move on to something that matters just a little bit.


OTOH, a lot of us feel differently. :)

Oh, and is everyone who didn't like the movie going to start their very own thread for their complaint, instead of posting in the pinned thread the way they're supposed to?
 
I've been thinking about this ever since I heard the new film was a reboot. I really can't see this POV if you're talking about Star Trek as a franchise/brand/license. There is still a ton of material out there being published in (for lack of a better term) the "Prime" Star Trek timeline. Between the comic books, novels, action figures and props etc. the original Trek still dominates most of Trek fiction and intellectual property. If by "as we knew it" you mean the "Prime" timeline, it's going to be around for a while I suspect.
 
Right, because an opened minded series that embraces the future can never change. It must die rather than change...:wtf:
 
The new Trek is alive and well, better than the old dead Trek
So this new film is better than the very best of TOS, TNG, DS9 etc?
This film is better than City on the Edge of Forever, Best of Both Worlds, The Visitor, Wrath of Khan, Yesterday's Enterprise, In The Pale Moonlight, etc etc?

Is that what you're saying? If that's so I think you need sectioning
 
Wow....I guess they should have spun off another watered-down, 24th century version TV show. Maybe rehashing the Naked Time, Mirror, Mirror, or Star Trek 3, instead of trying to find a way to expand on TOS characters/timeframe.
 
Right, because an opened minded series that embraces the future can never change. It must die rather than change...:wtf:

It can, and IMO, clearly has changed.

It has regressed from a franchise with a positive vision of the future and hopeful spirit into an Independence Day "let's blow stuff up" kind of mindset.

Also, I apologize if this should've been posted elsewhere, I don't post here much.
 
I think this film will be a HUGE hit; unwittingly disproving your claims of the "death of Trek". I think this film will be the best chance Trek has at "ah, ah, ah, ah, stay'in alive...stayin alive"!

If these guys can't do it, then nobody can. Dead Star Trek is Voyager, Enterprise, Insurrection and Nemesis.

That's a cold dead corpse brought to you by Rick Berman and his rogues gallery of inept out of ideas writers.

Thank God their Trek careers are dead!
 
It was beaten to a bloody pulp, rendered senseless and unimportant, reformed and shaped into a more pleasing shape, and fed to the horde of groundlings who'll gladly eat it up.

I just got back from seeing it.

It was bloody awful. Technically proficient, but conceptually something more like an abortion. A half idea. A "what if?" gone way too far. And a perversion of the brand's original intent. JJ Abrams would've been better off giving the finger to the creative talent, writers/producers, and fans of the series. That would've been much quicker and would've saved a lot of money which was instead invested in a pile of garbage.

Don't let me stop you, I know you have to see it. I know you think I'm crazy, or a geek gone wild, or something like that. Even after seeing it most of you will still hold that opinion of my perspective.

But IMO Star Trek, as we knew it, is dead.


God I just frikkin love the Brits!


But IMO Star Trek, as we knew it, is dead.

Good. Throw some dirt over the corpse and let's move on to something that matters just a little bit.


OTOH, a lot of us feel differently. :)

Oh, and is everyone who didn't like the movie going to start their very own thread for their complaint, instead of posting in the pinned thread the way they're supposed to?

I don't know if you mean that first line you wrote to be funny...but it was ...pretty good there...your first joke -- that succeeded...I'm proud! :)

And what are we moving onto that matters "just a bit"...what are we moving away from that doesn't matter....

And you feel differently...great, but have you seen the damn movie starship...have you???

I don't very much like your tone sir...especially when it comes to TOS -- You're one of the people that needs to show some damn respect for the original...again I'm shocked to find that you're even a "fan"..what the hell does fan mean to you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top