• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers STAR TREK BEYOND

1. Why does the Enterprise slowly, majestically make her way into Yorktown when she arrives yet is able to rocket her way out upon departure like she's on some sort of slingshot? I loved both sequences but logically it didn't make a ton of sense.
Going into Yorktown, they have to be slow to avoid crashing into the end of the docking tube. Obviously this problem doesn't apply when departing.

4. What was McCoy doing going through Chekov's locker in the first place? And I'm hoping he replaces whatever kind of booze he took.
He returned the booze after it had passed through a "biological filtration unit".
Yeah, I'm saying he peed in the bottle. McCoy is an a-hole.

Star Trek Beyond's Chinese theme song "Lost in the Stars" by Zhang Jie:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Generic pap. Rihanna was better.
 
J.J. Abrams Is Rumoured To Direct Man of Steel 2 (2017 november).
Hummm. Justin Lin again to direct ST4?
 
Posted this elsewhere, thought I'd add it here. A bit late to the party but here's my take.

JJ Abrams was 11 in 1977 , and 16 in 1982. I would take a stab and say two of his favourite films are SW:ANH and ST:WoK. Because he's remade both.

We'll put aside SW, that's been done. But all 3 ST films in the JJverse (or Kelvinverse as it's being called here) are revenge pics in which the Enterprise gets wrecked. Every. Single. One. This is getting dull, no matter how well they are made.

First: revenge. The motives of all 3 (Nero, Khan, Krall) are piss poor and unenlightened and shows highly intelligent men incapable of change over a number of years. Just like the original Khan. Is our world shaped by such men in IRL? Even bin Laden had other motives. To even fit the concept into ST09 they had to have Nero & crew floating about for 20+ years. They need to drop this trope. Now.

Second: the Enterprise. In TOS and TNG, the Enterprise was their rock, their platform, their fortress, from which they could sally forth on adventures both silly and serious, knowing they had a safe place to come back to, a shield and haven. But in every film since WoK of SFS, I guess, the ship has become largely expendable, or at a minimum under serious threat. What we didn't see was how well it served them for the 3 years of the 5 year mission (more on that later). I get why they did what they did, but to an old school fan like me, tearing it apart like that was a travesty, and makes me less invested in ship and crew (yes, I'm odd like that).

Other points. Kirk's bored? I thought he was going to start singing Bowie's 'Rocket Man'. When he was younger that was all he ever wanted, and deep down probably still feels he has debts to pay to his father and Pike. Spock reconsidering? I get that with the passing of the original, but at least his seeing the photo of the old crew helped him realise he needs to stay with them, for them and himself.

Okay, that's the bad stuff.

When it was good, it was really good. Yorktown was spectacular (if poorly defended). Individual scenes sparked and sparkled (like the Franklin racing underwater). I really liked Jayla. Great to see Uhura doing more than opening hailing frequencies, a step up to be much approved of. All the other crew were good, and I'm quite sad about Yelchin.

Pegg and Jung did a fantastic job on the script as a script, I just didn't much like the actual broad story arc, as stated above. If it's based on the script Orci & co were working on, I'm not so sure how the next one's going to go (co-writers doing ST4). There were some good individual lines and a really good balance showing all the main characters. The bad guy was just another bad guy, and even trying to underline his motive at the end didn't do much for me ("The Federation done done me wrong!"). Maybe the next time they could have a natural disaster as the 'villain' or something else, or a planet/empire, rather than a Big Bad individual.

There's much more to say, but this is long enough. I gave it 4/5.
 
But all 3 ST films in the JJverse (or Kelvinverse as it's being called here) are revenge pics in which the Enterprise gets wrecked. Every. Single. One. This is getting dull, no matter how well they are made.
Enterprise was only wrecked in Beyond. It was still flying at the end of the previous two films.
Khan was only a tool of Admiral Marcus, who was the object of his vengeance. Marcus's motives were more interesting - treachery and violence to protect the Federation.

I was disappointed by BEY, but for different reasons. I'm surprised you scored it so high.
 
@eyeresist
Okay Enterprise was heavily damaged in all 3.

Marcus's and Khan's motives to me were opposite sides of the same coin, couldn't have one without the other.

I scored it high because there were some solid Trek moments, some good one liners that matched the characters well, and spectacular effects.
 
Okay Enterprise was heavily damaged in all 3.
Yeah. I have two takes on that:

1. You don't make a movie that shows a lack of interesting things happening, so the Enterprise will get beat up.

2. It would be really great to see a fully operational and intact Enterprise doing its thing through the whole movie without the writer's crutch of hobbling it. There were ships that survived the Battle Of Midway unscathed and that was dramatic. One of three U.S. carriers sunk. Four of four Japanese carriers sunk. Do Midway in space without the Enterprise being the one that sinks.
 
Yeah. I have two takes on that:

1. You don't make a movie that shows a lack of interesting things happening, so the Enterprise will get beat up.

2. It would be really great to see a fully operational and intact Enterprise doing its thing through the whole movie without the writer's crutch of hobbling it. There were ships that survived the Battle Of Midway unscathed and that was dramatic. One of three U.S. carriers sunk. Four of four Japanese carriers sunk. Do Midway in space without the Enterprise being the one that sinks.
Personally I am not upset at the rough treatment the Enterprise gets in the reboot. It's pretty standard across most Trek films, so it's not like they were breaking some kind of sacred tradition to treat the Enterprise like good china. And STIV is one of the best Trek films of all time, and you only see the Enterprise like one time at the very end -- clearly you don't NEED the Enterprise to even be in the film for it to be successful. I love the Enterprise, but it's the crew that makes that ship fly.
 
Saw BEYOND again on the big screen for the final time.

It's just a great flick. As a Star Trek film, it really works for me. I've enjoyed it more each time I've seen it, and it's by far my favorite of the nuTrek movies.

Visually, it's just a stunning film, and the story itself has improved for me on repeated viewings too. The script is tight and there's never "that scene" that I just wish would hurry up and end. And there's so many little things the creators embedded into BEYOND...a lot of love went into making this one, and I appreciate that. Great stuff for Trek.

Not a perfect film for sure, but I'm very happy with this one. In my Top 2 or 3 of all Trek films.
 
I'd take JJ any day of the damn week over Snyder's 'splodey & plot-less direction.

I'll take neither.
Saw BEYOND again on the big screen for the final time.

For me, it's just a great flcik. I've enjoyed it more each time of I've seen it. By far my favorite of the nuTrek movies. Visually, it's just a stunning film, and the story itself has improved for me on repeated viewings too. The script is tight and there's never "that scene" that I just wish would hurry up and end. Great stuff for Trek.

Not a perfect film for sure, but I'm very happy with this one. In my Top 2 or 3 of all Trek films.

Agreed 100%. It is by far the best of the nuTrek movies.
 
Yeah. I have two takes on that:

1. You don't make a movie that shows a lack of interesting things happening, so the Enterprise will get beat up.

2. It would be really great to see a fully operational and intact Enterprise doing its thing through the whole movie without the writer's crutch of hobbling it. There were ships that survived the Battle Of Midway unscathed and that was dramatic. One of three U.S. carriers sunk. Four of four Japanese carriers sunk. Do Midway in space without the Enterprise being the one that sinks.
The Enterprise wasn't really beat up too much in ST 09 and actually took the fight to the Narada. So, we saw it operational without it being "hobbled" in at least one film.
I'd take JJ any day of the damn week over Snyder's 'splodey & plot-less direction.
Agreed. JJ Abrams is more interesting to me as a director than most, but especially Snyder.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top