Star Trek: The Infinity Generation!
To Boldly Go..Where No Energy Being Has Gone Before!

Don't you mean ''LSD''? or is that a ''ST4'' refrence?do any of those temporal cold war people see that far into the future? can they even do that? time for another hit of LDS.
Don't you mean ''LSD''? or is that a ''ST4'' refrence?do any of those temporal cold war people see that far into the future? can they even do that? time for another hit of LDS.![]()
It is the year 100000 AD, and the UINC Enterprise NSCCC 170174656 - BETA, (A ship built around a Dyson Sphere that can travel a MegaParsec a second at maximum velocity) is still boldly going where no one has gone before...
Star Trek: The Infinity Generation! To Boldly go... Where no Energy Being has gone before!
Do any of those Temporal Cold War people see that far into the future? Can they even do that?
It is the year 100,000 A.D. and the U.I.N.C. Enterprise NSCCC 170174656 - BETA (a ship built around a Dyson Sphere that can travel a MegaParsec a second at maximum velocity) is still boldly going where no one has gone before...
Star Trek: The Infinity Generation! To Boldly go... Where no Energy Being has gone before!
Do any of those Temporal Cold War people see that far into the future? Can they even do that?
It is the year 100,000 A.D. and the U.I.N.C. Enterprise NSCCC 170174656 - BETA (a ship built around a Dyson Sphere that can travel a MegaParsec a second at maximum velocity) is still boldly going where no one has gone before...
I absolutely love some of the ideas floating around in this thread. They would at least make a cool one-shot TV/straight-to-DVD movie, perhaps in the style of Peter Chung's Matriculated episode from The Animatrix, only as an extremely computer-enhanced live-action movie...
It is the year 100000 AD, and the UINC Enterprise NSCCC 170174656 - BETA, (A ship built around a Dyson Sphere that can travel a MegaParsec a second at maximum velocity) is still boldly going where no one has gone before...
You have to change the UINC. My eyes totally read it as UNIC and I keep thinking the captain has one ball. Nothing wrong with that, many dudes do. But...I don't know..change the UNIC
Rob
It is the year 100000 AD, and the UINC Enterprise NSCCC 170174656 - BETA, (A ship built around a Dyson Sphere that can travel a MegaParsec a second at maximum velocity) is still boldly going where no one has gone before...
You have to change the UINC. My eyes totally read it as UNIC and I keep thinking the captain has one ball. Nothing wrong with that, many dudes do. But...I don't know..change the UNIC
Rob
I think it works the way it is.
Also this Enterprise would have planetary sized 'shuttles' and (slipstream [at least] capable) escape pods the size of moons...
It is the year 100000 AD, and the UINC Enterprise NSCCC 170174656 - BETA, (A ship built around a Dyson Sphere that can travel a MegaParsec a second at maximum velocity) is still boldly going where no one has gone before...
Agreed. Anything recognizable as the Federation existing in 100,000 A.D. would not be believable to viewers. At that point you simply start a new show with Roddenbery-esque ideals, like the original concept for Andromeda.
I have been thinking about this a little more...the only way a 100,000 AD version would work, IMO, is if people from our time, and I mean OUR time, found themselves in 100,000AD and somehow became part of some storyline..
But humanity 100,000ad would be far too 'nerdy' to pull off and would, IMO, scare off regular fans..unless they had something to gage their ability to follow the story i.e, humans from our time..
Rob
yeah, just, aside from HG Wells and Asimov's Foundation, what else really tries to tackle that future? Trek tosses around the distant past (like that of Bajor), but it doesn't really have a vision that extends beyond our immediate future. of course, trek future and reality deviated the moment someone wasn't doing eugenics experiments in the seventies, but i agree with Rob... travelling into the distant future is as easy as approaching the speed of light for a while. wouldn't that happen sooner or later with someone? yeah, it's geeky and far out, but it might make for good sci fi.
I have been thinking about this a little more...the only way a 100,000 AD version would work, IMO, is if people from our time, and I mean OUR time, found themselves in 100,000AD and somehow became part of some storyline..
But humanity 100,000ad would be far too 'nerdy' to pull off and would, IMO, scare off regular fans..unless they had something to gage their ability to follow the story i.e, humans from our time..
Rob
yeah, just, aside from HG Wells and Asimov's Foundation, what else really tries to tackle that future? Trek tosses around the distant past (like that of Bajor), but it doesn't really have a vision that extends beyond our immediate future. of course, trek future and reality deviated the moment someone wasn't doing eugenics experiments in the seventies, but i agree with Rob... travelling into the distant future is as easy as approaching the speed of light for a while. wouldn't that happen sooner or later with someone? yeah, it's geeky and far out, but it might make for good sci fi.
I don't think it matters if it's the year 3,000 or the year 300,000, extrapolating humanity that far into the future is an academic venture broad enough that the year and how many zeros follow it are inconsequential. There comes a point at which we've got to introduce a modern perspective on future technology into Star Trek instead of the 1960s vision we're still running with. Having a show set in the far future without doing that would be a wasted venture, and doing such a thing would in turn completely change Star Trek into something very different and allow it to explore very different themes.
Just have an intra galactic war, they're so advanced they can travel to galaxies no sweat, and the fed is up against really weird aliens from andromeda who have no understanding of any human concepts whatsoever and just want to nuke everything. The Borg could have evolved into a cosmic network which intervenes every so often.
If you want to do something completely different from Trek...why call it Trek? Why not call it something else? If you want to call it Trek, then I think it should fit at least somewhat into the Trek universe.
yeah, just, aside from HG Wells and Asimov's Foundation, what else really tries to tackle that future? Trek tosses around the distant past (like that of Bajor), but it doesn't really have a vision that extends beyond our immediate future. of course, trek future and reality deviated the moment someone wasn't doing eugenics experiments in the seventies, but i agree with Rob... travelling into the distant future is as easy as approaching the speed of light for a while. wouldn't that happen sooner or later with someone? yeah, it's geeky and far out, but it might make for good sci fi.
I don't think it matters if it's the year 3,000 or the year 300,000, extrapolating humanity that far into the future is an academic venture broad enough that the year and how many zeros follow it are inconsequential. There comes a point at which we've got to introduce a modern perspective on future technology into Star Trek instead of the 1960s vision we're still running with. Having a show set in the far future without doing that would be a wasted venture, and doing such a thing would in turn completely change Star Trek into something very different and allow it to explore very different themes.
I wonder, as we advance further in science and technology, are we getting better at predicting the future, or are we just as inept as we were fifty or a hundred years ago?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.