• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers ST: Beyond - Surprising fact about Sulu

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, why would John Cho publicly declare Sulu to be gay unless he had the backing of the rest of the production team?

Do we know if John Cho is gay?

He's married to actress Kerri Higuchi, but what has that got to do with anything? Acting is a job. It's a separate thing entirely from someone's personal life. Countless LGBT actors have played heterosexual characters and vice versa. The one has nothing to do with the other.
 
He's married to actress Kerri Higuchi, but what has that got to do with anything? Acting is a job. It's a separate thing entirely from someone's personal life. Countless LGBT actors have played heterosexual characters and vice versa. The one has nothing to do with the other.

Have I said otherwise? Wait till I actually say something before presuming things about me. I was just curious is all and I thank you for your response, though I could have done without the lecture.
 
It's not you.

Christopher treats everyone like that.

Don't get so sensitive just because you're on the wrong side of history.

all these deniers would have had no trouble accepting the relationship as it was portrayed at face value and would never dream of interpreting a married couple as brother and sister.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
It's not you.

Christopher treats everyone like that.

Don't get so sensitive just because you're on the wrong side of history.



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Well, I don't know him as well as you do.
 
Christopher treated you like a child.

You got pissy about being treated like a child by Christopher.

I said "Don't worry, Christopher treats every one like a child".

You said "It's nice that I know Christopher so well".

I countered by saying "I don't know Christopher, I've just read his novels".

Then you said "Who is the novelist?"

Connect the dots( or look at Christopher's signature).
 
Christopher treated you like a child.

You got pissy about being treated like a child by Christopher.

I said "Don't worry, Christopher treats every one like a child".

You said "It's nice that I know Christopher so well".

I countered by saying "I don't know Christopher, I've just read his novels".
Then you said "Who is the novelist?"

Connect the dots( or look at Christopher's signature).

As Trip would say: "Don't get your panties in a bunch."

Or was it "Keep your shirt on"?

Anyway, you get the meaning, I hope.

Besides, it would benefit you a great deal more to read "Francois Le Champi" since it's a well-known masterpiece by a famous author than for me to read something... that isn't.
 
Last edited:
What? Simon Pegg, the author of the film, has repeatedly said that Sulu is gay in the film and that he and Doug Jung came up with the idea. It's clear that the authorial intent is that he is gay.

As far as Simon Pegg and Doug Jung, all I could find were third-hand accounts from John Cho.

But in the past I've seen and accepted gay characters in films. When I first saw Diamonds Are Forever[/]I I was able to tell that Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd were gay lovers. And we are talking about a film from the 70's! But Sulu and his brother/husband, sorry but they came across as brothers.
 
But really, with Beyond, the scenes with Sulu and his brother/husband and niece/daughter could've easily have been cut from the final film, as they didn't add anything to the plot of the movie.

No, the audience's remembrance that Sulu's partner and daughter are in imminent danger from Krall's super weapon - and then we see them being evacuated, knowing that nowhere is safe - adds immeasurably to the tension of the climax.

And Sulu's fleeting moment of onscreen affection was that of a lover, not a brother.
 
No, the audience's remembrance that Sulu's partner and daughter are in imminent danger from Krall's super weapon - and then we see them being evacuated, knowing that nowhere is safe - adds immeasurably to the tension of the climax.
I found that it didn't. It was just one of those moments were even if I hadn't seen it on screen I would've known that they were evacuated.

And Sulu's fleeting moment of onscreen affection was that of a lover, not a brother.

What moment? The hug? As I've said, I've seen brothers embrace like that before.
 
As far as Simon Pegg and Doug Jung, all I could find were third-hand accounts from John Cho.

Pegg went on record in The Guardian to explain the decision, making it clear that it was the consensus of the filmmakers:
Justin Lin, Doug Jung and I loved the idea of it being someone we already knew because the audience have a pre-existing opinion of that character as a human being, unaffected by any prejudice. Their sexual orientation is just one of many personal aspects, not the defining characteristic. Also, the audience would infer that there has been an LGBT presence in the Trek Universe from the beginning (at least in the Kelvin timeline), that a gay hero isn’t something new or strange. It’s also important to note that at no point do we suggest that our Sulu was ever closeted, why would he need to be? It’s just hasn’t come up before.

And of course it was Pegg who made the post explaining the retroactive timeline theory on his very own blog three days later. And both these statements were quoted all over the Internet. The only way you could possibly have failed to find them is if you didn't even look.


But Sulu and his brother/husband, sorry but they came across as brothers.

And I've explained why the filmmakers were forced to keep it ambiguous. That doesn't change the fact that we know what their intent was. I don't know why you're so determined to deny that.
 
I remember back about a decade ago, before LGBT activism and legal rights advancement really exploded in the U.S., when an embrace like the one Sulu and his husband conducted would most certainly have elicited derisive jokes or accusations of being gay.

At least with my peers and probably their parents, anyway.

Fascinating how much the social status quo has changed in just the past decade.

Edit: funny thing about that: I spent the bulk of my childhood in Indiana. As I recall, Indiana has a reputation of being "the Texas of the north", or something like that. And yes, I am frequently disgusted by Mike Pence.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top