Just like I said, there's no evidence they would go through it if they already have a spouse.If Pon farr is about finding a mate then why do Vulcans go through it every seven years? If they already have a spouse, what's the point?
Well, they'd have to: Spock was going to have the traditional wedding, but his wife-to-be evidently was not in any sort of pon farr or its putative female equivalent. (Instead, it appears she had been courting with another male who appeared to be in synch with Spock on the pon farr matter; did she have sex with him, and if so, wouldn't that prove t can be had before the actual onset of that cycle's pon farr?)apparently Vulcans like all living things with male and female body parts can have sex anytime they want and reproduce offspring.
If the seven-year cycle were the only chance of breeding, and both males and females had it, the logistics of arranging for synched pairs would be immense. And would it be exactly seven years (or 7.231 years or whatever) for each individual, or would married couples soon drift apart?
It's simply commentary on forced marriages, from another angle - instead of "cold business agreement between families, with love and perhaps lust to follow if the pair gets lucky", it's "uncontrollable lust, arranged for by the families and their trusted telepathic bonder". Alien enough and exotic enough, but recognizable enough, too.It makes Pon Farr an utterly meaningless concept.
In the greater context, it makes all sorts of sense (say, desert dwellers having to devise a mechanism to stop inbreeding and force the boys to seek out the girls from another village beyond the desert). But that was hardly a concern for the original writers. Very little in Trek is; author intent is pretty much irrelevant in episodic television where there are too many authors to count... It's the unintended result, the sum total, that matters.
Timo Saloniemi