south park episode "human centipad" disscussions and comments
- Thread starter timothy
- Start date
I haven't seen the Human Centipede movie yet, unfortunately. I wonder if I missed jokes because of that. Still, solid episode.
Interesting how commanding Mrs Cartman was in this episode. It's like this took place just after that Dog Whisperer episode from a few years back.
Interesting how commanding Mrs Cartman was in this episode. It's like this took place just after that Dog Whisperer episode from a few years back.
I watched a Tosh.0 30 minute scene by scene summary of Human Centipede, so I feel like I've seen it, maybe even grosser. There's really no complexity to the film beyond what was seen here. Subject A shits into subject B's mouth, who then passes the even less nutritious shit to subject C. Some scientist thought this was a good idea.
Human Centipede was a rubbish movie. A really, awful, horrible, dull, just ugh waste of time.
I haven't seen this episode yet, but I'm looking forward to seeing what South Park does with it.
I haven't seen this episode yet, but I'm looking forward to seeing what South Park does with it.
I'm not sure vanilla shit tastes any better though. 
Hilarious episode. 
So how do Matt and Trey know specifically that cuttlefish and asparagus make the worst-tasting shit?
Don't answer that.
Don't answer that.
It was notable mainly for being an idea twisted enough to get the attention of the current jaded horror movie audience. Not easy to do.
I'm definitely going to read the iTunes terms of service from now on.
I've seen the Human Centipede, I actually think it's a decent little movie.
I've seen the Human Centipede, I actually think it's a decent little movie.
I'm a child of the 80s, so I'm still partial to the game. I think the movie adaptation took a few too many liberties with the deep narrative of the game.
I've seen the Human Centipede, I actually think it's a decent little movie.
This. It was nothing great, but Me and a friend had some laughs watching it. it was fun.
Am I the only one who didn't find this episode to be that hilarious?
Sure, it had a couple of laughs, but unlike Cartman, watching Kyle eat shit really doesn't do it for me
hehe, and granted, I'm not that familiar with American law, but surely they have something similar from Norwegian law that an agreement can't go against principles of good faith ("redelighet eller god tro"), but thats completely besides the point, because South Park is a cartoon that isn't supposed to make sense, or be realistic.
But still, I see how this episode could be funny, I just didn't find it funny.
Oh, and a question for those of you familiar with law, how binding are standard agreements / terms of services in the US? , Because here, they're not binding at all if they're hidden on the bottom of a long text, or made with small letters, if you reasonably shouldn't be expected to know what you just signed, then it's not binding. Whoever who wants to make an agreement has to make it real clear what you're signing on.
Sure, it had a couple of laughs, but unlike Cartman, watching Kyle eat shit really doesn't do it for me
hehe, and granted, I'm not that familiar with American law, but surely they have something similar from Norwegian law that an agreement can't go against principles of good faith ("redelighet eller god tro"), but thats completely besides the point, because South Park is a cartoon that isn't supposed to make sense, or be realistic.
But still, I see how this episode could be funny, I just didn't find it funny.
Oh, and a question for those of you familiar with law, how binding are standard agreements / terms of services in the US? , Because here, they're not binding at all if they're hidden on the bottom of a long text, or made with small letters, if you reasonably shouldn't be expected to know what you just signed, then it's not binding. Whoever who wants to make an agreement has to make it real clear what you're signing on.
They're not binding so much as they're "I understand what this means and agree that the terms in it are acceptable to me." So you can't, for example, get pissed when a company sells your information when you buy their product and agree to their TOS because that information is in the TOS.
However, agreeing to a TOS doesn't give the company any power to do anything illegal to you and it's not as binding as, say, a contract is which needs to be witnessed and notarized.
However, agreeing to a TOS doesn't give the company any power to do anything illegal to you and it's not as binding as, say, a contract is which needs to be witnessed and notarized.
Similar threads
