The whole talk about lighting storms was nonsense, in my opinion. Those are scientists aboard a starship. If they see a white hole, they will talk about a white hole. If they see a black hole, they will talk about a black hole. If they read some technobabble anomaly, they will definately talk technobabble. Only if they talk to the stupid news reporters, then they will probably talk about lighting storms in space. But the writers decided they would rather have something really stupid instead of some technobabble (although that would have been realistic).
Not if the writer goes along saying that his script is following the most scientific, most current, most awesome theories, which he did say. Then it's time to criticize him for saying so but writing bullshit at the same time.Yeah, all Star Trek "science" is magic. What else is new?
Dude Star Trek eps have always talked out of both sides of their mouth on this stuff. Some stuff is "science." Some stuff is magic.
It's never all one or all the other.
Warp drive : 20% science. 80% magic.
Transporter : 20% science. 80% magic.
Time travel : 20% science. 80% magic.
Everyone appeals to the most current scientific theory they can get their hands on. That's what puts the "science" in "science-fiction."
People then make tweaks and changes to make the story work. I've always suspended my disbelief to enjoy Star Trek.