• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Someone explain the ending of Hollow Men to me. (Spoilers, clearly.)

Thrawn

Rear Admiral
Premium Member
So, Tomas Roeder was Section 31, or at least Internal Affairs. He was undercover in the anti-war movement. He started to really believe what he was preaching, and so decided to leave, and set up the whole latinum theft thing to make that possible.

But... I still don't understand the last scene between him, Sisko, and Garak. Why does he want to kill Sisko? What is this thing that he was unwilling to do? Why does Garak have some kind of weird realization that the whole thing is just about Tomas being obsessed with Sisko? Are these things supposed to be mysterious, or am I just missing something?

I'm talking about these passages:

From Garak's POV: "Sisko. At this moment, Garak came close - closest - to seeing the whole story; unraveling the threads that bound him to this place, these people. But the pain, and the darkness deluded him, and all he understood was Roeder. The charm, the brutality, the whole terrible episode had simply been contrived to find out why Sisko had come back to Earth. Not Garak. Not the conference. Not even the protest. Just Sisko. After that, Garak could penetrate Roeder's mind no further. Whatever it was that Roeder wanted to know, whatever it was about the commander of Deep Space Nine that had driven Roeder to take these desperate measures-all of this Garak could not begin to guess. He had hoped that Roeder would tell him. Now he had to doubt whether Roeder was going to get the chance."

Then, the same moment, from Sisko's POV: "Garak's eyes widened, ever so slightly; it seemed that something had become very clear to him. His lips curled slowly into a cold smile. Sisko could not later say why that had made the difference. But, at that moment, it seemed to him that everything came together at once: Vreenak's murder, his failed confession, Ross's sanction, Layton's approval, Veral's consent. All of the lines drew together at this point. Shooting Roeder would not be a crime, but that did not make it right."

Huh?

Was Roeder just freaking out because the latinum theft was happening on DS9, and he thought Sisko might know about it? It seems like something much more important is going on here, but I can't think of what it could be.

And while we're at it - just before this, Roeder and Garak have a conversation about being pushed too far. Were we supposed to figure out what Roeder was being asked to do that was pushing him too far, or was that supposed to be an Unanswered Question?

I was with the book right up until the end, but I can't figure out if this is intentionally vague or if I'm just not clever enough to figure out how it all fits together.
 
Re: Someone explain the ending of Hollow Men to me. (Spoilers, clearly

And while we're at it - just before this, Roeder and Garak have a conversation about being pushed too far. Were we supposed to figure out what Roeder was being asked to do that was pushing him too far, or was that supposed to be an Unanswered Question?

It's been a while since I read it, so my memory isn't certain, but I came away with the impression that it was about the Changeling virus. I'm sure it strongly hinted that Roeder was trying to smuggle information about it to the Dominion via those encoded latinumn bars, until Sloan and buddies intercepted the Hamexi and took them back. I think the attempt at genocide was what pushed him too far...

As for why Sisko is so important, I believe it's because Sisko also violated his morality for the cause of winning the war (with tricking the Romulans into fighting on the Federation's side), but his actions met with approval from Ross, Leyton, Veral, etc. Roeder needs the same approval, or else wants to know how Sisko deals with it. Why was Sisko allowed to violate his conscience and the law without consequences? How could he? I don't remember the specifics since it's been a while since I read it, but I'm sure it's something along those lines.
 
Re: Someone explain the ending of Hollow Men to me. (Spoilers, clearly

I think you're right. The genocide attempt on the Founders was what prompted Roeder to quit and blow the whistle. None of our heroes ever picked up on that particular fact.

So far.

Seeing as the 31 plotline is likely still an ongoing one for the Trek novels set in the 2380's, I think I will refrain from further comment.
 
Re: Someone explain the ending of Hollow Men to me. (Spoilers, clearly

Hm. That makes sense. Indeed, Nasat, you are correct; there is a sentence that strongly implies that, which I apparently missed.

Thanks :)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top