There's a second one of the same vintage which was just as obviously fake.Here's the AI pic of Kirstie that some dufus argued with me about. I mean, it's nice, but it's obviously not real.
View attachment 55250
There's a second one of the same vintage which was just as obviously fake.Here's the AI pic of Kirstie that some dufus argued with me about. I mean, it's nice, but it's obviously not real.
View attachment 55250
No, allowing some “psychic truth” isn’t a justification for permitting AI bullshit to permeate the market and completely override actual, factual truth.Well, you can say there is a certain "psychic" truth there...even if she really did think "Star Trek" was about celebrities out and about--a pre "reality show" nicer than Hedda Hopper's hijinks.
This soft-becoming-hard censorship against those critical of "AI" is concerning, quite frankly.
This shadow banning has been happening regardless whether the comment is about A.I., politics, or anything. Google/Youtube shadow bans comments of various kinds and like the original poster, you only find out when you check from another browser (of have cookies cleared).
It's hard to find compilation videos now that don't include A.i. material.
And then there are videos with people standing and looking at you talking about something (like cleaning techniques, for example) who are not real people but A.I. generated.
No, you can't.Well, you can say there is a certain "psychic" truth there
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.