I thought the line on Regula was "Let me show you something that will make you feel young, as when the world was new." No 'again'. No repeat of 'young'.
From a transcript: "Let me show you something that will make you feel young -- young as when the world was new."
http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Star-Trek-II-The-Wrath-of-Khan.html
CAROL: Let me show you something ...that'll make you feel young as when the world was new.
Yup, your quote is the correct version, according to my TWOK DVD.From a transcript: "Let me show you something that will make you feel young -- young as when the world was new."
http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Star-Trek-II-The-Wrath-of-Khan.html
This transcript disagrees.
CAROL: Let me show you something ...that'll make you feel young as when the world was new.
Billy Van Zandt, in TMP, as the alien with thew funky eyes. He only had lines in the extended cuts of the film. "And Captain Decker? He's been with the ship every minute of her refitting." Very flat and lifeless.
Runner up: the female officer who beams up before Bones is finally ordered to step into the transporter.
"He insisted we go first, sir. Said something about first seeing how it scrambled our molecules."
She then robotically turns and walks away after robotically delivering her lines. There must have been a buttload of nepotism on this film. Or they just kept casting crap actors.
Well there are two ways to look at it.
1. Either she was intended to be unlikable from the start and if that was the case I guess I'd say "Well done". But the fact she wasn't, in an acting sense, good as a good guy or bad guy kind of negates that
2. She was supposed to be likable and Meyer and co thought she did a good job, when in reality she was a smug little ass from the beginning. In which case in Catrell's terrible acting and the director not reading it correctly.
What I do know is that when you have a character who is supposed to be "good" turn out to be "bad" it is generally much more dramatic and makes for a much better film if the character is someone you at least sort of like from the start.
Compare this to "The Godfather". At the beginning of the story Michael is this decent guy who fought for his country when he could have gotten out of it, doesn't like what his father does but still loves him anyway and is very good to whatever Diane Keaton was at the beginning of the film (wife, fiancee, girlfriend I forget). He's not exactly Mister Sunshine but he seems like a decent man with a set of morals. So you kind of like the guy that he is this way despite the environment he grew up in.
Then he kills the guys in the restaurant, but they were corrupt and trying to kill his father anyway, so you can justify it. But then, because Sonny gets blown away and Fredo is an idiot, he's suddenly thrust into the position, he never imagined he'd be in, where he has to take over when his father dies.
At first you think he's going to be different than his father, but no. By the end of the film he's having his enemies killed in cold blood at the same time he's renouncing evil, then he let's his brother in law believe he's going to be spared before having him killed and he lies to his own sister about doing it.
Then of course in GF 2 he commits what many would consider the ultimate act of evil when he has his own brother, who he knew was kind of a helpless doof, killed. Not only that but he lets Fredo think he's forgiven him at the exact same moment when Michael is giving the silent order to have him killed. So it turns out he even more ruthless than Vito ever was.
If Michael had been a complete jerkoff from the start this might not have been so surprising. But the fact he did seem like a decent and likable guy at the beginning of the series made it absolutely horrifying when he does the things he does.
Whether is was lousy acting, directing, or both the fact Valeris comes off as so unlikable from the start makes it totally "Oh, who cares, she was a bitch anyway" moment when the big "surprise" as her being a conspirator is revealed.
I think as far as the impact on the films themselves, Robin Curtis' Saavik is the worst. I like the actress, but she was just plain miscast.
This discussion should have 4 categories.....
Using TWOK as a quick reference.
Bit parts---Jedda, Beach
Small parts---Preston, Joachim
Medium parts---Terrell and the 2nd tier regulars
Large parts----Kirk/spock/McCoy and the main guest(s) like Khan
Not saying those examples are bad parts simply size examples.
Bit parts---I agree about that girl in the transporter in TMP before McCoy--terrible line reading
and I agree there were a ton of bit actors who stunk in TMP
DeFalco, "back that way sir.", Branch, etc.
Small parts---Caithlin Dar is pretty bad
Medium parts---Captain Esteban, Ilia (horrible as a "human" and amazingly just as bad as a robot)
Large parts---Kirk in TFF was pretty bad,
Also, I hated Curtis' Saavik but that was how she was instructed to act--so not her fault.
And the "alien ensign" in TMP was a brand new race--so we don't know their normal affect. That may have been the way they talk--rather unemotionally.
I think as far as the impact on the films themselves, Robin Curtis' Saavik is the worst. I like the actress, but she was just plain miscast.
I think as far as the impact on the films themselves, Robin Curtis' Saavik is the worst. I like the actress, but she was just plain miscast.
Really? I liked Robin Curtis.
I guess Curtis is the George Lazenby of female Vulcans in a way because the actress prior made such an impression, but I thought Curtis did a commendable job.
I'd nominate the faceless transporter chief that we only hear from TMP. The one who said:
"Enterprise, what we got back didn't live long. Fortunately."
Two people just had their DNA rearranged into mutated monstrosity so terrible that death itself seem like an improvement...and he sounds so bored.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.