• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So... Has All the Upheavel Been Due to Behind the Scenes?

Damn, I really enjoy the show and would have picked up original novels in a heartbeat.
 
I recall that the Alias novels also did not credit the authors on the covers.
That's not correct. I wrote three Alias novels and my name is on the front cover of all of them.
Really? Did you write the adult ones or the young adult ones? And is it on the spine, the front cover, or both?

I'm going by memory here, because I didn't buy them. (I didn't watch Alias, once I realized that Syndey Bristow was too fucking stupid to live. But that's a different story.) But I remember seeing them in the bookstore, and it struck me as strange at the time that the authors weren't credited.
 
^ I wrote three of the adult ones. And my name is on the front cover but not the spine. (I was told that they put "J. J. Abrams" on the spine of all the books so that they would all be shelved together--and not scattered throughout the General Fiction section. Not a bad idea.)

The authors were also credited on the YA books. I know because a friend of mine wrote one and I've got it on my shelf.
 
Fair enough. I was going by what I remembered seeing in the bookstore, as I didn't buy them.

I actually didn't know, Greg, that you had written Alias novels. My apologies.
 
Fair enough. I was going by what I remembered seeing in the bookstore, as I didn't buy them.

I actually didn't know, Greg, that you had written Alias novels. My apologies.


No problem. You probably just noted that they were all shelved under "A" for "Abrams."

Or at least that was the plan. Alas, from what I saw, some bookstores couldn't tell the YA and adult books apart and shelved them all in YA. Too bad. I enjoyed writing those Alias books. It was a fun gig.

Anyway, I'm positive the nuTrek books weren't scuttled because our names were going to be on the covers . . . .
 
I Love Trek Lit. I'll keep reading it as long as we've got good authors, like we do and have certainly had the past decade.

But I have to be honest, the past 3 years or so, have seemed really... chaotic.

It's worth adding here that while the timing issues are product of turbulence behind the scenes (so it seems), you're confusing things a bit by making plot details you don't like--Captain Exri Dax, say--product of a failed editorial process.
 
^Actually, very few of the issues Frontier brought up were consequences of the editorial layoffs/departures, but took place earlier for a variety of different reasons, as I specified in my reply.
 
I've noticed from the Starfleet Academy novels that the authors are not credited on the covers.

They are, but it's in teeny tiny font.

I was told that they put "J. J. Abrams" on the spine of all the books so that they would all be shelved together

I speculated a few weeks ago - and the new ST YA titles do seem to be getting shelved under "S" for "Star Trek", due to no prominent author, if they make it to a YA shelf of a bookshop, that is. Quite a few large Aussie bookshops have started designating YAs to their own substantial section in recent years, and most seem to be mixed SF/Fantasy/Vampire/Romance/Zombie themes.
 
Last edited:
Really? That would be outstanding if that were the case. What makes you think that they're going for that greater consistency?

I don't think that, I've just noticed some things suggesting that there's a chance it could be the case. Mainly their decision to shelve the four Abramsverse novels that I and my colleagues wrote for last year. If they're only willing to have prequel tie-ins published, it implies they prefer to avoid the risk of tie-ins being contradicted by subsequent movies. But that's largely conjectural.

Feel free to tell me it's none of my flarging business, but if you guys already wrote the Abramsverse novels and the publisher decided to shelve them...do you still get paid for the work? Or was it all for naught?
 
Yes, we got paid, well before the books were cancelled. We fulfilled our end of the contract by delivering the manuscripts, and they fulfilled theirs by paying us for our work. But once we deliver the work to them, it's their property to do with as they will, and if they decide not to publish it, that's their choice. They couldn't very well ask us to give the money back, because we'd done everything that we were contracted to do.
 
If they're put back on the schedule after the second movie comes out and the authors are asked to amend the manuscripts to fit between the two movies, will you be paid for that or would it still come under the original contractual obligation?
 
If they're put back on the schedule after the second movie comes out and the authors are asked to amend the manuscripts to fit between the two movies, will you be paid for that or would it still come under the original contractual obligation?

If that were to happen, it would count as part of the revision process as covered in the contract.

Keep in mind that what we're getting isn't a salary, it's an advance on royalties. In theory, it's income from sales of the actual book. Of course, if the book doesn't sell enough to pay off the advance, or doesn't go on the market at all, then we still get to keep the full advance. But it's a payment for the complete work, not for X amount of labor. In exchange for delivering something they can publish -- which may require an unpredictable amout of revision to fit their requirements -- we get an up-front share of the profits from said publication.
 
If they're put back on the schedule after the second movie comes out and the authors are asked to amend the manuscripts to fit between the two movies, will you be paid for that or would it still come under the original contractual obligation?

If that were to happen, it would count as part of the revision process as covered in the contract.

Keep in mind that what we're getting isn't a salary, it's an advance on royalties. In theory, it's income from sales of the actual book. Of course, if the book doesn't sell enough to pay off the advance, or doesn't go on the market at all, then we still get to keep the full advance. But it's a payment for the complete work, not for X amount of labor. In exchange for delivering something they can publish -- which may require an unpredictable amout of revision to fit their requirements -- we get an up-front share of the profits from said publication.
I understand what an advance is, Christopher, I was just curious about this particular situation since it doesn't come up often, if at all.

I'm still looking forward to them being put back on the schedule in 2012-3 if possible.
 
I wasn't assuming you didn't know what an advance was. I was merely discussing how the nature of an advance applied to this particular situation.
 
Though I am not at liberty to discuss what intelligence I've received from behind the scenes, the postponement of the four books had nothing to do with authorial credit --- which Bad Robot could not have revoked, anyway, since it's guaranteed to the authors in our contracts, and also because Bad Robot does not, in fact, own Star Trek.

So that means you get your royalties regardless of how prominently or not prominently your name is displayed on the book? I darned well hope so.
 
Royalties and author credits have nothing to do with each other. The former is a financial matter; the latter is a marketing decision.

Authors with short names (like, say, "Greg Cox") can get larger type than authors with long names, simply for design reasons. That doesn't mean I get more money! :)

Seriously, the prominence of an author's name usually isn't a contractual issue at all. This isn't Hollywood. Credits are not something people negotiate--or worry about all that much.

The one exception is movie novelizations, where, generally, the author's name is not allowed to be larger or more prominent than the author of the original screenplay. But, again, that's a Hollywood thing, not a publishing issue. And perfectly reasonable, as far as I'm concerned.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top