^ Well, I figure that in a lot of peoples' minds, it's somehow better if he's simply brain dead instead of dead dead. That way our hero Chloe doesn't have to be a murderer.
^ Well, I figure that in a lot of peoples' minds, it's somehow better if he's simply brain dead instead of dead dead. That way our hero Chloe doesn't have to be a murderer.
Sorry to hear about your brother. I don't have any experience with this myself. I was just going with how entertainment like Smallville generally handles the situation. Unless the good guy is a soldier, a cop or some sort of anti-hero, most shows and movies of this sort have the good guy putting the bad guy out of commission without actually killing them.But what if Chloe had simply hit the guy over the head with a bat? The guy lives but is brain dead. The result is the same but different weapon.
Sorry to bring personal experience into this BUT my brother suffered a massive head injury when I was a kid. He fell during a work accident. He was Brain Dead. My parents decided not to keep his body alive by machine.
He was gone.
If a similar injury happened as a result of purposeful attack -
that would be murder.
Yeah, I know its just a tv show. Not trying to be overtly seriously here. This was almost 20 years and I barely remember him I was so young. Just giving my POV. Which is that my definition of "Brain Dead" has been ingrained in mind my whole lofr.
Guess we will.while I think this guy was murdered I think it was really Brainiac in control and not Chloe. Just my current take....
We will see.![]()
Asked and answered off-shot. You don't have to watch Captain Kirk go all the way from his cabin to the bridge to know how he got there.
--Ted
Wow, you really go out of your way to defend the crappy writing on this show, don't you?
Of course, it may be because you consider it the pinnacle achievement of writing aspirations.
Asked and answered off-shot. You don't have to watch Captain Kirk go all the way from his cabin to the bridge to know how he got there.
--Ted
Wow, you really go out of your way to defend the crappy writing on this show, don't you?
When someone in the Heroes threads states that Heroes had a "Smallville moment," do you take that as a compliment?
Well I'd say Heroes' biggest "Smallville moment" was Nathan bleeding out with critically injured organs and being declared dead, then coming back to life and no one thinks twice about it.
Could you imagine on BSG when Starbuck came back from the dead, if no one gave it a second thought? No one wondering where she's been, if she's a Cylon trick, if she's a Cylon, or Apollo -- who saw her die -- simply shrugging it off like it was no big deal?
Characters being promoted or demoted off-screen isn't the same as an incomplete story coming back from commercial break completely ignored.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.