• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sisko in RBoE..... SPOILERS!!!!!

It remains to be seen, at this point, whether or not Sisko's arc in RBoE will be incorporated into or referenced in the DS9-R going forward, because RBoE isn't, as far as I know, officially part of that continuity the way that ZSG is, at least at this juncture.

That's just a matter of labeling. It's all one continuity, and events that happen under one series title can be reflected in a different series -- for instance, Janeway's death in Before Dishonor and Seven's transformation in Destiny both being followed up on in Kirsten Beyer's Voyager novels, or Ranul Keru's backstory from TNG: Rogue and DS9: Trill: Unjoined being followed up in Titan.

When it's said that RBoE isn't technically a DS9 novel, that just means that the majority of that book is about Spock and the Romulans, with only about a third of it being Sisko's story. But that one-third of RBoE actually reveals more about DS9 character arcs and events than Zero Sum Game did. It is definitely a part of the same continuity.

Christopher, you kind of missed the point of what I was trying to say. :) ZSG deliberately and conclusively places itself within the 'core' continuity of the DS9-R (along with Avatar through The Soul Key), whereas RBoE does not. I was merely pointing that fact out, but wasn't discounting the possibility of it (RBoE) eventually joining ZSG as part of said 'core DS9-R' continuity; it would certainly fit and not be out of place. I'd personally like to see it become officially recognized as part of the DS9-R, but wouldn't be completely upset if it never happened and RBoE remained simply one of those novels that falls into the "connected to the DS9-R" category.
 
Has everyone forgotten the Prophets' warnings to Sisko?

"The Sisko is of Bajor, but he will find no rest there"

The other one I can't remember the exact quote of, where the Prophets warn Sisko that being with Kasidy will cause them suffering.

We have no idea what happened to Sisko between The Soul Key and Rough Beasts..., and no idea what kind of suffering he may have been put under by the Ascendants. He could have been tortured, mind-raped, lost a number of friends and acquaintances, etc. We do not know if something happened to break his spirit and lest we forget that for 12 years (or thereabouts) he has been communing with the Prophets and trying to reconcile the fact that he is both a human Starfleet captain and the Emissary of the Bajoran people, a role he has never been entirely comfortable with. It seems that at this point he has been completely abandoned by the Prophets, something which may have come about as a result of the war with the Ascendants.

Also look at Kira, who is now a Vedek in a religious order with an Ascendant close by. Kira has always been devout but never showed inclinations toward a theological existence. That's a far cry from the freedom fighter and later Bajoran militia officer and Starfleet Captain that she was. What happened to her? Sisko and Kira both have been changed by the events between The Soul Key and Rough Beasts/Zero Sum Game, no one is saying how out of character it is for Kira to become a Vedek.

Time and events change people, and since we really have no clue as to what happened to them within a five year time span, we can't begin to imagine what is or is not out of character. I'm a very different person now than I was five years ago.

In 2006 I was single, jobless and looking for anything so I could move out of my parents' apartment in London, England. Now, I am married, living in the United States and working for my mother-in-law. Emotionally I'm also different. I don't think I was ready for marriage then, I had an odd relationship with my parents and a bad relationship brother and few friends, my self-esteem was very low. My relationship with my parents and brother and never been better, and I have an amazing group of friends now across two continents. I haven't been through a war or lost anyone close to me.

I think we should reserve judgement on Sisko until we find out what happened with the Ascendants and the Prophets and see how that affected him. Only then can we make an informed judgement.
 
Christopher, you kind of missed the point of what I was trying to say. :) ZSG deliberately and conclusively places itself within the 'core' continuity of the DS9-R (along with Avatar through The Soul Key), whereas RBoE does not.

I know that's what you're claiming, but I don't agree with your interpretation. RBoE reveals more about the DS9 continuity than ZSG does. ZSG is tightly focused on Bashir. The only other DS9 character it reveals anything about is Vaughn, and it only gives the aftermath of some unspecified event. RBoE reveals much more about the DS9 continuity. It reveals what's happened to Sisko and Kira, it establishes that the Ascendant crisis came to a head and was resolved, and it depicts what happened to Vaughn, answering the questions ZSG raised.

So I think you're misunderstanding what it means when DRGIII says that RBoE is not a DS9 novel. He's not saying that it doesn't connect to the main DS9 continuity -- he's saying that the DS9 elements of RBoE represent the minority of its total content, because it's primarily a book about Spock and the Romulans. But those parts of the book that are DS9-related are at least as relevant to the core DS9 continuity as the entirety of ZSG is, if not more so.
 
Christopher, I was basing my statements exclusively on the fact that ZSG's final page states "The saga of Deep Space Nine will continue" (an assertation that isn't present in RBoE). You're right that RBoE does more than ZSG to offer insight into the post-Soul Key DS9 storyline/narrative, but it is the latter that is explicitely stated to be part of the DS9-R continuity. Because RBoE gives more insight into the post-Soul Key DS9 storyline than ZSG does, it is the more logical choice of the two novels to be counted as part of the official DS9-R continuity in place of ZSG, but that's not the way that things ended up shaking out (for whatever reason). DRG's statements regarding RBoE didn't even really factor into the equation.

Hope that clarifies where I'm coming from on this. :)
 
I'm just saying -- I'm having trouble figuring out how to get this across effectively -- that the choice not to designate RBoE as part of "the saga of DS9" is more about defining RBoE's own content (i.e. the fact that 2/3 of it is not DS9-related) than about defining its relationship with the DS9-R continuity. A third of the book is important to DS9's continuity, but the majority of it is about other stuff, so it doesn't get designated as DS9.
 
I get all of that. :) BTW, one could use what you've said to make the case that ZSG shouldn't have been designated an official part of the DS9-R continuity, because it doesn't have a whole lot to directly do with the wider DS9 narrative either (at least so far as I can tell based on where I'm currently at in the book).

FWIW, I consider RBoE to be as much a part of the DS9-R as ZSG is, and will treat it as such in future readthroughs (I'm also going to incorporate the Mirror Universe stories "Saturn's Children" and "A Terrible Beauty" - which I haven't yet read - into my reading list for future readthroughs of the DS9-R).
 
I get all of that. :) BTW, one could use what you've said to make the case that ZSG shouldn't have been designated an official part of the DS9-R continuity, because it doesn't have a whole lot to directly do with the wider DS9 narrative either (at least so far as I can tell based on where I'm currently at in the book).

See, I don't know what you mean by that. "Not part of the continuity?" Of course it's part of the continuity, even if it isn't under the label. Its events are continuous with the events in DS9-R novels, it does not contradict them, so by definition, it's in the same continuity. And I don't even know what "official" means to you in this context. All Pocket Trek novels are official, because they're approved by CBS's licensing office. All that's really in question here is how the books are labeled. When you talk about "not an official part of the continuity," that just confuses the hell out of me.
 
^ Christopher, you and I are looking at and using/applying the same word (continuity) in different ways; when I refer to the 'continuity' of the DS9-R, I'm using the term as it is used in TurtleTrekker's "Charting the Novel-verse" thread. When I talk about the 'official continuity' of the DS9-R, I'm referring to those novels which are absolutely 'essential reading' in terms of the DS9-R's ongoing narrative and are defined in TT's thread as being the "core continuity" of the DS9-R. As per that thread, here is what I'm referring to in relation to ZSG and RBoE:
Avatar 1 & 2
Demons of Air and Darkness and Horn and Ivory
Mission Gamma (Twilight, This Grey Spirit, Cathedral, and Lesser Evil)
Rising Son
Unity
Worlds of DS9 Volumes 1-3
Warpath
Fearful Symmetry
The Soul Key

We know that, initially, RBoE was supposed to be added to that list (TT's thread even has it currently listed as such), but, for whatever reason, Zero Sum Game (which, AFAIK, was never explicitely identified as being intended to be a DS9-R 'core continuity' novel) was added in its place (as per its final page).
 
^I still say you're reading way too much into labels. Labels do not define reality; at best, they describe it in an oversimplified and often misleading way. What's important is the content. It should be obvious that the Sisko portions of RBoE are absolutely essential reading for the ongoing DS9 continuity -- I mean, come on, it's Sisko! What's more "core" than that? It doesn't make any sense to disregard such a self-evident reality just because a label somewhere doesn't agree with it.
 
RBoE is connected in numerous ways to the post-finale DS9 novels and story narrative, but that doesn't automatically make it an essential/core part of that narrative, particularly given that, if it is or becomes factored into the DS9-R "core continuity", it marks only his second appearance, AFAIK, in the post-finale novels in any capacity (the first being Unity). There are far more connections to/with the post-finale DS9 novels present in the 'background' of the story of RBoE than there are within its Sisko-centric main story, at least in its final form.
 
RBoE is connected in numerous ways to the post-finale DS9 novels and story narrative, but that doesn't automatically make it an essential/core part of that narrative, particularly given that, if it is or becomes factored into the DS9-R "core continuity", it marks only his second appearance, AFAIK, in the post-finale novels in any capacity (the first being Unity).

Huh? No, Sisko is featured in Bajor: Fragments and Omens, cameos in Warpath, and plays a significant though not central role in Fearful Symmetry and The Soul Key.

And I don't know why you're so hung up on defining some rigid dividing line between what's "essential core continuity" and what isn't. You're making a far bigger deal out of that difference than there really is.
 
[/QUOTE] Why compare it to Picard? Besides, after Picard was rescued from the Collective at the end of BobW, it wasn't actually 'resolved' untill the episode after, and even he carried it with him for the rest of his life.
Wanting to things to be peachy at the end of an episode watch Voyager. DS9 has left us with clifhangers that we're less then happy before, and left us with a feeling of dread.[/QUOTE]

Mage,

Here we go again, with this false choice. I've said all along, read my previous statements, that I didn't want an easy ride for Sisko, or for any character for that matter. I think many defenders of the choices made in RoBE where Sisko is concerned try to argue that it was this choice or complete bliss. And that's not true. There are a lot of different things that could've been done with Sisko that didn't result in the decision that he made, and that wouldn't resulted necessarily in a 'peachy ending'.

Why compare him to Picard? They're both captains. You make a salient point about BOBW2/Home, and how the Borg issue lingered for Picard, but along the way he confronted the problem and at least dealt with it as best he could, providing mini-resolutions that were perhaps overturned whenever the writers wanted to bring the Borg back. Plus Picard was challenged along the way by Guinan and Lily Sloan particularly that made him see the error of his stances.

Why didn't we get an alternate point of view in RoBE? Someone to call Sisko on his b.s. This could've been Kira or Kassidy, but Kassidy was pretty much mute and Kira was meek. I also made the comparison to Picard because in his recent stories his character is growing, whereas I feel that Sisko regressed. Picard is allowed to face his demons and overcome then, becoming a better man and capable father in the process recently, whereas Sisko is back to running away from his problems, with the new twist of leaving behind his loved ones to boot. With how the DS9R has been over the last few years, I am concerned that DRG won't get to finish what he started.

I'm not opposed to the idea that this is the start of a new arc for the character. Once again, its not a direction I would agree with. And let me repeat I am concerned that this arc won't get finished leaving Sisko and Kasidy in a terrible place with no resolution. So far we are still waiting on other arcs for the DS9R to get resolved, like the Ascendant arc. Well I guess we sort of know what happened, but it would be nice to see how that came about. As for Sisko, on second thought, there is a part of me wishing that the arc wouldn't continue, I must confess. That the next writer ignores RoBE, making it the Superman Returns in a new round of DS9R books.

As for Sisko being depressed as another poster (s) suggested, I'm not opposed to believing that either, but it still doesn't justify the actions he took, and until he is diagnosed as suffering from depression, that's speculation. I wish the new VOY counselor, or an equivalent, made house calls via hologram I suppose.

My UT buddy BrotherBenny brought up the Prophets' warning, which is all well and good, but nothing in that warning precluded Sisko from taking his wife and kid (s) with him, away from Bajor. It didn't say he wouldn't find peace on Earth or another world, or aboard a starship. As for the sorrow, it never said what the cause of that sorrow would be exactly either. I would disagree with BB about Kira. I think there has been some grumbling, if I recall correctly about Kira being a Vedek, but nothing like the turn with Sisko. For one, I think it struck critics like me far more viscerally because it seemed to cut out the heart of the character in a way Kira's turn as a Vedek didn't.

In fact, Kira was already devout, as you mentioned, and it wasn't that much of a stretch to see her go the way she did. On the show she didn't seem to care much for politics, and outside of returning to the Bajoran military, or perhaps going on a starship, I could see her choice to join a religious order, as an organic one. But now that I'm thinking about it, Captain Kira would've made a better choice on the Aventine than Ezri. FYI, I didn't care much for what was done to Spock in RoBE either, as I pointed out in the review of the book in that thread. He was a dupe of Tal'aura. So, I would say that Kira probably made out better to me than Spock or Sisko in terms of characterization.
 
Last edited:
DarKush, the reason I wondered about why compare him to Picard, is because somehow a lot of Trek fans compare captains to each other because they were captains and should behave the same way somehow. Like some fans claiming one captain's action was stupid and that the other captain would have done a better job, just because. Perhaps this is not what you're saying, and then I apologize.

The reason I don't like it, is just because they were both captains, it doesn't mean they both act the same way. They are both competely different people, who react to things differently. So what if Picard handled his situation better? Just because he did, doesn't mean Sisko must automatically do aswell.

Personally, I like the idea of how no one is giving Sisko a wake up call, making him suddenly realize the errors of his way and him returning to Kass who will lovingly forgive him and they are once again a happy couple. It just doesn't happen in real life, and even though I wish things could be better for Sisko, I applaude the writers for daring to do something other then the Superhero Starfleet captain who fights through his ordeals and comes out a better man who will save the day.

Sisko has had a rough life, finally finding a point where he is happy, then is suddenly taken from that life by trying to safe Bajor and is then forced to life with the Prophets. When he finally does come back, and finally has a change to start this happy life he has always wanted, things in the back of his head make him feel uneasy. Memories of his time with the Prophets that tell him bad things are about to happen. Again, he knows his life will be a difficult one, and even though we haven't seen it happen yet (the Ascendant Arc) we know he took it hard. Then the kidnapping of his daughter (which might have something to do with the Ascendant Arc, we don't know yet).... This man has had so many terrible things happening around him, and always his loved one are getting hurt. No wonder he feels it's his fault.
Is running away the right thing to do? Perhaps not, but it's not unthinkable that someone does it.
I know we all love this man who is seen as a hero by many, both in-universe and by fans, but now he is down, beaten and defeated. Ofcourse some fans will not like it, but you can never please everyone. Like I said, I think it's great that they dare to do something like this to a main character, and I can't wait to see what's next.
 
I would have thought that the reason ZSG stated "The saga of DS9 will continue" rather that RBoE is solely because it falls chronologically later, rather than the amount of content dedicated to DS9 in the respective novels.
 
...it sounds like this is possibly the beginning of a new arc for Sisko. This is DS9, more often than not, when something like this occurs it's the beginning of a new arc, not a one and done thing.

I have read the book, and it actually read less like the begining of an arc and more like a part two. There were a lot of important events that happened to Sisko that shaped his outlook and decisions that were alluded to in RBoE, but not yet chronicled to us the readers (The Ascendants conflict and Rebecca's kidnapping to name two). I would be willing to believe that Sisko's actions may make more sense once we read the stories that shaped his perspective in RBoE.
 
...it sounds like this is possibly the beginning of a new arc for Sisko. This is DS9, more often than not, when something like this occurs it's the beginning of a new arc, not a one and done thing.

I have read the book, and it actually read less like the begining of an arc and more like a part two. There were a lot of important events that happened to Sisko that shaped his outlook and decisions that were alluded to in RBoE, but not yet chronicled to us the readers (The Ascendants conflict and Rebecca's kidnapping to name two). I would be willing to believe that Sisko's actions may make more sense once we read the stories that shaped his perspective in RBoE.

This is the most logical assumption, but a lot of people seem to forget this, and think the writers decided to have Sisko act like this out of the blue. There are reasons for Sisko's behaviour, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of David R. George's books to be released in 2012 is going to deal with this. I certainly hope so.
 
For this creative choice to work, the reasons for Sisko's conduct had to be rock solid, and they weren't.

Can you please not make 'blanket statements' like this? It's my single biggest pet peeve, and really undermines the credibility of anyone who does it.

It was not a "blanket statement," but a concise summation of my opinion on a specific subject. I make basically two points that one might disagree with separately, or both at once.

1) For Sisko to abandon his family, he would need to have strong reasons to do so, and those reasons would have to stand up to scrutiny, i.e. be "rock solid."

2) Sisko's actions in RBoE were not adequately justified by the narrative.

I think it's clear, both from RBoE itself, and from DRGIII's comments on the subject prior to quitting the forums, that there were supposed to be rock solid reasons for Sisko's actions in the story.

However, I would argue that this is not the case, which is why a discussion of the issue quickly leads to the idea that Sisko is acting irrationally due to extreme depression (meaning that his actions are not justified, he only thinks they are because he is suffering from mental illness), or to the possibility that it would all make sense if we knew more about Sisko's experiences between The Soul Key and RBoE.

On a separate but related point, DarKush is correct that the choice between "happily ever after" and the story in RBoE is a false dichotomy and blatant straw man argument.

Thirdly, simply because Sisko thinks he is doing the right thing, or has been able to convince himself that this is so according to the narrative, does not exonerate him. Neglectful fathers commonly convince themselves that their actions are justified, no matter how irrational and/or unjustifiable they might actually be. In RBoE, Sisko acts like a man who is trying to come up with an excuse to ditch his family on Bajor. Naturally he finds one.

Many details of the narrative tend to support this reading. For example, Sisko abandons Kasidy and his four year old daughter without even explaining the reasons for his choice to them (he only does so from long distance much later). If he is really doing this with their best interests in mind, why can't he stand up in front of them and say so? Refusing to do so smacks of cowardice and tends to undermine the notion that Sisko's reasons actually justify his actions.

Sisko makes no arrangements to remain a part of his daughter's life following his separation and divorce from Kasidy, even though the prophecy supposedly motivating his actions makes no stipulation at all regarding his daughter. If Sisko is really trying to do what's best for his family, why does he act like getting a divorce somehow means that he can no longer be a father to Rebecca?

Sisko files for divorce from long distance, without ever discussing the matter with his wife, then acts relieved and asks his first officer if he wants to go have a drink. Here I have to wonder if the author was deliberately drawing the parallel between Sisko's actions and those of a typical deadbeat dad. The link to the stereotype is too strong to ignore: man divorces wife and abandons young child to go hang with the fellas. In short, the psychology on display chimes, in many respects, with that of a man who is desperate to escape his responsibilities as husband and father, knows what he is doing is wrong on some level, but manages to convince himself to do it anyway, because deep down, that's what he wants.

The psychology on display is not convincingly that of a man who desperately wants to remain with his family, but is tragically forced to abandon them in order to save them.
 
Last edited:
DarKush, the reason I wondered about why compare him to Picard, is because somehow a lot of Trek fans compare captains to each other because they were captains and should behave the same way somehow. Like some fans claiming one captain's action was stupid and that the other captain would have done a better job, just because. Perhaps this is not what you're saying, and then I apologize.

The reason I don't like it, is just because they were both captains, it doesn't mean they both act the same way. They are both competely different people, who react to things differently. So what if Picard handled his situation better? Just because he did, doesn't mean Sisko must automatically do aswell.

Personally, I like the idea of how no one is giving Sisko a wake up call, making him suddenly realize the errors of his way and him returning to Kass who will lovingly forgive him and they are once again a happy couple. It just doesn't happen in real life, and even though I wish things could be better for Sisko, I applaude the writers for daring to do something other then the Superhero Starfleet captain who fights through his ordeals and comes out a better man who will save the day.

Sisko has had a rough life, finally finding a point where he is happy, then is suddenly taken from that life by trying to safe Bajor and is then forced to life with the Prophets. When he finally does come back, and finally has a change to start this happy life he has always wanted, things in the back of his head make him feel uneasy. Memories of his time with the Prophets that tell him bad things are about to happen. Again, he knows his life will be a difficult one, and even though we haven't seen it happen yet (the Ascendant Arc) we know he took it hard. Then the kidnapping of his daughter (which might have something to do with the Ascendant Arc, we don't know yet).... This man has had so many terrible things happening around him, and always his loved one are getting hurt. No wonder he feels it's his fault.
Is running away the right thing to do? Perhaps not, but it's not unthinkable that someone does it.
I know we all love this man who is seen as a hero by many, both in-universe and by fans, but now he is down, beaten and defeated. Ofcourse some fans will not like it, but you can never please everyone. Like I said, I think it's great that they dare to do something like this to a main character, and I can't wait to see what's next.

Mage,

My comparisons regarding Sisko and Picard were more based on how their two concurrent storylines were going and how Sisko, the established family man was now treating his family whereas Picard, the man who was established to have issues with kids, now is a caring and active father.

I think you're making some assumptions that Kassidy would forgive him or that the Siskos would be a happy couple. For one, I don't think happy equates to boring. Two, we really haven't seen much of the Sisko marriage to know what its state was. From DRG and RoBE it appears pretty tenuous due to the fact that Sisko could leave the union without discussing it with her.

Also in regard to us being shown the reasons for Sisko's behavior in other books, books that might not even be written or published, I think that's wishful thinking on fans' part at best, or poor writing at worst. I agree with flemm that the narrative didn't support Sisko's actions nor treat such a momentuous decision in a respectful way for either Ben or Kassidy.

I think it is poor writing or poor creative decision making to not put it all in this book instead of leaving it for other stories to follow up on or flesh out retroactively. Perhaps Sisko's decision would've made more sense-somehow I doubt it-but still if we had actually seen Rebecca's kidnapping, even as a flashback, instead of the unnecessary Tzenkethi War scene-and have that kidnapping more directly tied to the prophecy. At present I don't know if other books will pick this up, or go back and lay the foundation for it. Unfortunately I think the DS9 crew got the shaft, with this jump forward.

I wish there had been an anthology or something that came out before the Typhon Pact to bring us all up to speed and perhaps to cushion the blow of what was done to Sisko.
 
It was not a "blanket statement," but a concise summation of my opinion on a specific subject. I make basically two points that one might disagree with separately, or both at once.

1) For Sisko to abandon his family, he would need to have strong reasons to do so, and those reasons would have to stand up to scrutiny, i.e. be "rock solid."

2) Sisko's actions in RBoE were not adequately justified by the narrative.

I think it's clear, both from RBoE itself, and from DRGIII's comments on the subject prior to quitting the forums, that there were supposed to be rock solid reasons for Sisko's actions in the story.

However, I would argue that this is not the case, which is why a discussion of the issue quickly leads to the idea that Sisko is acting irrationally due to extreme depression (meaning that his actions are not justified, he only thinks they are because he is suffering from mental illness), or to the possibility that it would all make sense if we knew more about Sisko's experiences between The Soul Key and RBoE.

On a separate but related point, DarKush is correct that the choice between "happily ever after" and the story in RBoE is a false dichotomy and blatant straw man argument.

Thirdly, simply because Sisko thinks he is doing the right thing, or has been able to convince himself that this is so according to the narrative, does not exonerate him. Neglectful fathers commonly convince themselves that their actions are justified, no matter how irrational and/or unjustifiable they might actually be. In RBoE, Sisko acts like a man who is trying to come up with an excuse to ditch his family on Bajor. Naturally he finds one.

Many details of the narrative tend to support this reading. For example, Sisko abandons Kasidy and his four year old daughter without even explaining the reasons for his choice to them (he only does so from long distance much later). If he is really doing this with their best interests in mind, why can't he stand up in front of them and say so? Refusing to do so smacks of cowardice and tends to undermine the notion that Sisko's reasons actually justify his actions.

Sisko makes no arrangements to remain a part of his daughter's life following his separation and divorce from Kasidy, even though the prophecy supposedly motivating his actions makes no stipulation at all regarding his daughter. If Sisko is really trying to do what's best for his family, why does he act like getting a divorce somehow means that he can no longer be a father to Rebecca?

Sisko files for divorce from long distance, without ever discussing the matter with his wife, then acts relieved and asks his first officer if he wants to go have a drink. Here I have to wonder if the author was deliberately drawing the parallel between Sisko's actions and those of a typical deadbeat dad. The link to the stereotype is too strong to ignore: man divorces wife and abandons young child to go hang with the fellas. In short, the psychology on display chimes, in many respects, with that of a man who is desperate to escape his responsibilities as husband and father, knows what he is doing is wrong on some level, but manages to convince himself to do it anyway, because deep down, that's what he wants.

The psychology on display is not convincingly that of a man who desperately wants to remain with his family, but is tragically forced to abandon them in order to save them.

You keep referring to your opinion in absolute terms, as if it's the only opinion/logical conclusion that can be drawn from the events of RBoE. Myself and others disagree with your opinion, therefore you really shouldn't be presenting it in the manner you have.

Regarding Sisko's behavior at the end of RBoE, it's meant to be the result of him having an epiphany; he doesn't turn back from the course he's set himself, but makes an effort to move forward along that course in a manner different to how he'd originally been planning/intended.

Fairly early on in the novel, DRG makes it clear that the manner in which Sisko initially chooses to 'walk his path alone' is to completely cut himself off - willingly - from anything related to his past, and without letting anyone get close enough to decipher his behavior or intrude on his solitude (hence telling Kira not to mention that she talked to him when she goes to see and offer comfort and emotional support to Kasidy, and his remaining cut off and aloof from his entire crew aboard the Robinson and rebuffing his XO's attempts to pull him out of his 'funk'). By the end of the novel, however, DRG demonstrates that Sisko has changed his mind on this front by having him officially file for divorce and send Kasidy a message explaining himself as best he can, and by having him reach out to his XO and offer to share a drink with him.
 
...it sounds like this is possibly the beginning of a new arc for Sisko. This is DS9, more often than not, when something like this occurs it's the beginning of a new arc, not a one and done thing.

I have read the book, and it actually read less like the begining of an arc and more like a part two. There were a lot of important events that happened to Sisko that shaped his outlook and decisions that were alluded to in RBoE, but not yet chronicled to us the readers (The Ascendants conflict and Rebecca's kidnapping to name two). I would be willing to believe that Sisko's actions may make more sense once we read the stories that shaped his perspective in RBoE.

This is the most logical assumption, but a lot of people seem to forget this, and think the writers decided to have Sisko act like this out of the blue. There are reasons for Sisko's behaviour, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of David R. George's books to be released in 2012 is going to deal with this. I certainly hope so.


Or it could just that part of the plot is badly written. I'm pretty sure that before he flounced off, George said that everything you needed to know was in that book.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top