• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Silo (Apple TV+) | Rebecca Ferguson, David Oyelowo, Tim Robbins

Evidence of DNA tampering ?
The banning of microscopes is indeed one curious aspect, allthough this would also work to stop close examination of microcircuits (like the one in the relatively primitive hand camera that Juliette inherited from George, and gave to Walker to examine).

Another point is the secret selective breeding program going on.

And there is also the intro of the series, which shows the stairs while highlighting them in a way that suggests DNA strands.

Finally, if medical experiments are going on that could be the whole point of the Silo thing, with the supposed doomsday being an excuse that may not even have happened (or if it did, not have been that bad that the surface is still completely unliveable after more than 300 years). What the Silo denizens are told becomes less believable with every new piece of info that comes out.

I have not read the books, no idea if there is anything more to do this or it is coincidence/misdirection.

Whether or not Juliette and co are "superhuman", in any case the show has a tendency to let its character survive neck-breaking stuff without nary a scratch. Knox and Shirley dropping down without brakes on the cables they were using, is a prime example, besides all the stunts Juliette has survived. Then again, action heroes have been surviving unlikely stunts for decades.
 
They've been trying to breed for docility, which is just stupid. I don't think that's attached to genes.
Nurture.

Meek mommies and daddies raise meek children.

Nothing to do with genetics.

Although, I feel that conclusion "raising for docility" is a spurious red herring raised by an unbalanced dingbat.
 
Then why do only certain people get to reproduce? It feels like some kind of eugenics to me.
That's how breeding works?
You notice a wolf is particularly friendly. You get it to make pups. Among the pups, you keep the friendly ones and discard ruffians. You keep breeding selectively like that and eventually have a consistently docile breed. That can, hypothetically, be done with Humans.

A non-eugenic example. In the novel "Station 11", the first few years after the apocalypse are super-violent...but after around ten years everyone who remains is chill. Because all the ax-crazy people killed themselves off quickly.
 
We binged season 2 today. Why the hell
would you kill all 10000 people!
That seems insane.

That ending! I wondered if they accidentally switched to another show for a minute. However, I guessed correctly what was in the bag.
My only guess (I haven't read the books) is that it's a way to prevent the inhabitants of one silo from interfering with another silo. You can easily walk between at least a couple of them. So, if the inhabitants of one silo get rowdy, you can prevent them from riling up other silos. Maybe.

Although that seems odd because they'll die outside anyway, as the Silo 17 people found out. And there aren't enough suits for everyone.

I don't know!
 
Read the books to disvover a possible explanation. This adaptation might not go the same route, of course, but an interview I heard Tim Robbins give on the BBC's One Show in the UK suggested otherwise.

Nursery crymes.
 
Last edited:
One mystery they didn't clear was was the "mines", i wonder how/where they are with what we know about the layout of the silo, and how they avoid mines of one silo breaking into the mines of another.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top