It would be interesting to have a poll asking:
Was nuBSG?:
1. Good/Very Good/Excellent: Doesn't need improvements.
2. Good/Very Good/Excellent: Could still use improvements.
3. Very Poor/Poor/Average: Could use improvements.
4. Very Poor/Poor/Average: Doesn't warrant improvements.
I, myself, would vote for 3. The pilot movie is amazing, as is most of the first couple of seasons. In at least the last 1.5 seasons, it kind of went off the rails for me. It was clear they didn't have a plan (the writers nor the Cylons), and I thought the ending was poor. It was a struggle even to get through the last season, just so I could see the plot wrapped up.
I will admit the the show had a shitty third and fourth season, and that the ending was bad, but the series is a million percent better than the original series, and has the wider love of the general public and most of sci-fi fandom.
I tend to agree. The first 15 episodes of Lost In Space had real potential had they kept the tone somewhat serious and tried not to make it as "fun" as they had done. The first four episodes actually were kind of dark what with Smith trying to get the robot to kill Don in a rather brutal manner. Kinda dark for a family show. I loved that. The rot set in 2nd and 3rd season and by the end the writers had milked the cow dry and had run out of ideas.
The Lost In Space comic books from Innovation Comics (written by Bill Mumy) and the 1998 movie were better than the TV show; to me, those are the real Lost In Space. It's too bad the movie didn't do well enough for a sequel, and Innovation went under as a company, thus preventing more from being published.
EDIT (11/18/2016): I sometimes wonder what Lost In Space would be like if Gene Roddenberry had become the producer; I'm betting that the level of characterization and story would have become better.
Last edited: