Should Trek XII have lens flares & camera shake

[The Castellan]

Someone's looking to start trouble...

Let me start off...

Lens flares and shaking cameras make it look more "realistic"!

No it doesn't. Lens flares and shaking cameras just make for poor cinemitography...

Phew! Glad that's over with!

FRIEND!!!!!

I've stated many reasons why I do not like Trek 2009, and these two are another pair of reasons to add to that list.

Lens flares gave me a headache.

 

[Kemaiku]

3000 lens flares or bust.

 

[Stumpfoot]

Camera shake is like turning the distortion up on your amp:It hides the fact you cant play guitar worth a s#*t.

 

[maneth]

With luck it'll be optimized for 3D meaning probably less lens flare and certainly less camera shake, unless they want people to throw up in their popcorn.

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Camera shake is like turning the distortion up on your amp:It hides the fact you cant play guitar worth a s#*t.

Except that wasn't the case here.

 

[Kemaiku]

I rewatched the film the other day, the lens flares and "shake" barely register the entire film.

 

[Nerys Myk]

It should look like an earthquake in glass factory.

 

[Kemaiku]

It should look like an earthquake in glass factory.

With hundreds of windows, on the sunniest day of the year.

 

[Anji]

If it makes sense in the storyline and intelligently advances the plot, then yes.

 

[The Castellan]

Camera shake is like turning the distortion up on your amp:It hides the fact you cant play guitar worth a s#*t.

Or bad actors that always speak in a low whisper to try and cover the fact they can't act.

 

[JarodRussell]

If it makes sense in the storyline and intelligently advances the plot, then yes.

Lens flares and camera shakes?