• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Should they have used Romulans instead? (Spoilers, probably)

The Wormhole

Fleet Admiral
Admiral
So, the backstory with the Klingons is that there's been limited contact for over a century, although there have been attacks made by Klingons, in which Michael Burnham's parents were killed, making them sort of a personal nemesis for her.

But what if instead of Klingons, they had gone with Romulans? They already work canonically in that we know they disappeared after the Romulan War and weren't seen again until Balance of Terror. We can retcon the attacks as that although the Federation itself never had contact with the Romulans for a century, they did still continue to antagonise the Vulcans (the Vulcans stayed quiet about this to cover the secret of their relation to the Romulans). With Michael's parents being killed in one of these attacks, we could perhaps go a step further and suggest the attack on the Vulcan school was also orchestrated by Romulans, thereby increasing Michael's vendetta against them.

The only drawbacks are that the whole religious extremist angle they're setting up doesn't seem consistent with Romulan behaviour, but then it isn't really consistent with Klingon behaviour either so that's irrelevant. Also, by having the Romulans attacking the Federation now it'd make it damn obvious this isn't the Prime Universe, but that pretense is going to have to be abandoned by the time the season's done anyway.

Thoughts?
 
There's already so many inconsistencies with canon, they should a' just said to hell with it, lets press on with another Trek universe to put this in.

Be that as it may, I was happy enough with the Klingons in this.
 
They did a reboot visually. The content is consistent with prime Trek, at least that's what they're aiming for. The klingons work in this context. The Romulans not.

They filled in a few gaps (what happened since "Enterprise"), and made their own little changes. But overall, it fits pretty nicely. Klingons ignoring outsiders for 100 years and warring with eachother - only small outside attacks - is pretty consistent with canon IMO. Does it feel a bit "re-used"? Like the Romulans before "Balance of Terror", and again when they disappeared again for 100 years until TNG? Yes. Is it out of place? Not really. IMO. But, this being a prequel to TOS and all, it really only could have been the Klingons, not the Romulans.
 
I like that it's Klingons, and that we're finally getting to see why they're so scary.

2 episodes in, and the goofball singing, headbutting, drunken, honor-obsessed fools of TNG and DS9 are already forgotten. The Klingons of Discovery are dangerous fanatics.
 
As I've said before, canon violations aren't an issue with me. So, for the simple reason that Romulans aren't as overused as Klingons, and basically what we got was more of the same Klingon neanderthal warrior bullshit, I'd say at this point I'd have rather they used the Romulans as well.
 
The only advantage to using the Klingons was the language.

But just about everyone agrees that that was a poor creative choice in the end.
 
As I've said before, canon violations aren't an issue with me. So, for the simple reason that Romulans aren't as overused as Klingons, and basically what we got was more of the same Klingon neanderthal warrior bullshit, I'd say at this point I'd have rather they used the Romulans as well.

I love the Klingons, they're my favorite Trek aliens outside of Vulcans. What I like in this show is that they have returned the Klingons to villain status and at the same time they have more of the warrior-honor mentality. But instead of just making them simple bad guys like they were in TOS, we're delving deeper into their culture and seeing its richness and depth and seeing things from their perspective which lets us see why they are the way they are.
 
The only advantage to using the Klingons was the language.

But just about everyone agrees that that was a poor creative choice in the end.

It wasn't the Klingons speaking in Klingonese with the sub-titles and all, which was a tad silly but forgivable (we are watching Star Trek after all), it was that damned boring stunted and slow delivery of their words. It was totally irritating to watch and listen to.
 
Not sure how Klingon's being away makes sense after they had disastrous first contact which lead to decades of conflict, at least according to Picard.
 
The people working on the show cited that as a reason why they won't show Romulans in Discovery.
Considering all the changes done so far, it seems strange that's being treated as unalterable doctrine. Especially since Trek XI already ignored it.
 
Considering all the changes done so far, it seems strange that's being treated as unalterable doctrine. Especially since Trek XI already ignored it.
That's because Trek XI changed the Timeline. A 24th Century Romulan made direct contact with a Fed ship in 2230. (It was a major plot point of that film) :)
 
That's not really a reason.

Thought crime, newb!!!! Oh right...it says you joined in 2001.

I suggested the same thing about the Romulans/Balance of Terror ripoff and got shouted down and called a newb by so called "fans" of Star Trek who are supposed to know their stuff. It's just a coincidence, they say! Nothing to see here, move along
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top