• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

SGU Comic Con Panel

Not really, the usual questions ... it was a bit bland actually, but granted they don't have that much con-experience, if at all.
 
The low point of the panel was when someone asked Jamil Walker Smith how it felt to be following in the footsteps of his grandfather Greg Morris and his father Phil Morris -- to which Smith responded that he has no relation to the Morrises at all. Oops! Although it looks like that fan may have gotten the idea from Smith's IMDb bio. Somebody should correct that. Is anyone here a registered IMDb member?
 
Thanks^

“The first thing we did was make a blood pact that we would not have rubber-faced, English speaking aliens in the first season!” Cooper said. “Because it takes place out on the frontier, it’s about exploring the universe — galaxies we have never been to — we really wanted that experience to feel somewhat realistic — find aliens or alien life forms that you feel you might find out in space.” He said that the first season will include some very “alien” aliens.

I like the sound of that.
 
I just hope they consult with some scientists on the design of their nonhumanoid aliens, instead of just giving us big insects or cats, or variants on the human shape like in that Avatar movie. All my life I've been dying to see some plausible aliens in SF film or TV.
 
^It's a little thing called "science." Understanding physics, mechanics, and biology can help you figure out a lot about what might be possible, what's unlikely, and what's definitely impossible. For instance, a human-sized alien with insectlike compound eyes is implausible because compound eyes have low resolution and are only practical on the very small scale of insects; something like the Than in Andromeda or the Tritovores in Doctor Who: "Planet of the Dead" should by all rights be effectively blind. A species with crablike pincers instead of fingers or analogous manipulative organs wouldn't be capable of complex tool use and thus couldn't make clothes or machines or starships. A species capable of flight would have numerous aerodynamic and structural constraints on its anatomy that anyone familiar with the mechanics of flight can deduce, though of course it's dependent on the density of their native atmosphere. (Not gravity, since gravity and buoyancy cancel out precisely.)

There are scientists and SF writers who devote a lot of thought and care to figuring these things out. I've spent the better part of my life working out scientifically based designs for alien species, even going so far as to work out their evolutionary history. Of course it's speculation, but it's informed speculation.
 
^ Blah blah blah.

That's all that is, there are writers who think they know what life may look like when they don't have any more of a clue than anyone else.
 
It's odd how people who don't actually know anything about a subject think they're qualified to assume that actual experts in the field are fools. Or that their ignorance somehow gives them the right to be rude and insulting toward a qualified person who's trying to explain the subject.
 
It's odd how people who don't actually know anything about a subject think they're qualified to assume that actual experts in the field are fools. Or that their ignorance somehow gives them the right to be rude and insulting toward a qualified person who's trying to explain the subject.

Only the wise know how much they don't know. Humility works both ways. (or should)
 
And the ignorant never knows how much they don't know, and most don't care to find out; which is unfortunate.

I'm with Christopher on this one. We might not know for sure what actual aliens may look like (because mutations are largely random), but those who are well-versed in biology, chemistry, and physics do have more of a "clue" than those who don't. From our understanding we can point to certain Sci-Fi creatures and say: "the probability of something like THAT evolving and surviving and advancing is very low".

Because, hey, it's happening here on Earth.
 
It's Stargate on SyFy - is there any realistic estimation that they are going to have something other than humanoid aliens?

Love to see it, but the economy and their budget being what it is, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Oh, and can someone please explain the platypus to me? I still don't get that one. :D
 
It's Stargate on SyFy - is there any realistic estimation that they are going to have something other than humanoid aliens?

Well, TPTB have "made a blood pact" to not have humanoid aliens in the first season. They said so during the comic con panel.

Though I guess around here TPTB's words are about as trustworthy as a banker.
 
Someone thinks way too highly of themselves.

Plenty has been written speculating about plausible extraterrestrial life-forms in a scientifically valid way. You should pick up a book sometime.

Life Everywhere: The Maverick Science of Astrobiology and Rare Earth are a couple good ones I've run across. (Rare Earth makes the argument that life outside of Earth is not as common as sci fi scenarios would have us believe.)

For a fluffier read, Life Signs - The Biology of Star Trek is an entertaining analysis of what Star Trek gets right and wrong (mostly the latter, natch).
 
“The first thing we did was make a blood pact that we would not have rubber-faced, English speaking aliens in the first season!” Cooper said.
How about not having them at all??
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top