Ethical practioners work to avoid coercion....isn't that exactly the kind of question for which you would consult a mental health professional to determine the best way in which to proceed?
Court ordered treatment sucks.
Ethical practioners work to avoid coercion....isn't that exactly the kind of question for which you would consult a mental health professional to determine the best way in which to proceed?
Let me ask you a simple question: how to you force treatment? If someone is offered treatment and refuses to take it, then the next step is to detain them to keep them from harming themselves.It seems like a jump to assume that that's the approach that would be recommended, versus potential other options, especially hundreds of years from now.
Yes.Are you a mental health professional?
Reasonable? Probably not. Certainly I know of some unreasonable ones who have made less than helpful suggestions.Did Picard Senior make any effort to speak with mental health professionals to get advice? Do we think any reasonable mental health professional would say, "Well, the best thing you can do for her is to lock her away?"
If they were on an official date, that's actually the final episode.And I think the episode when Worf and Troi started dating?
Pretty well sums it up.I grew up with TNG. No, S3 was not the best season of PIC. To me, S3 is just S1 but with a TNG coat of paint, wrapped in a TOS movie, where Data isn’t dead at the end. And I never grew up fantasying about a TNG movie in the style of a TOS movie. If the S1 cast was in the place of the TNG cast, it would not be well received by those currently praising it, imo. A lot of S3 is dependent on nostalgia.
S3 is still liked for the DS9 callbacks, the Tuvok cameo, and TATV (quietly) being retconned out of existence. And basically fixing a lot of messes from the Berman era, an era I do like overall. But its not my top season.
S1 at least tried to tell an original story and do new things with the universe.
How's that?and TATV (quietly) being retconned out of existence
I like both Season 1 and Season 3 just about equally. I like Season 3 a tiny, tiny, tiny bit more but that's because I like it being done in the style of a TOS Movie. The TNG Cast helps, but the idea of doing like a TOS Movie is what really sold me on the concept. If it had been the TNG Cast back together again doing in the style of a TNG Movie, then I'd be like "No, fuck that!" One good movie out of four didn't cut it for me the first time and I wouldn't have wanted to see more of that again, TNG Cast or not.If the S1 cast was in the place of the TNG cast, it would not be well received by those currently praising it, imo.
That's what happens when it's following up on something that ended two decades ago. If they hadn't been doing nothing but prequels from 2001 until 2020 (except for Nemesis in 2002 and the far-future-set "Calypso" in 2018), then the stuff Picard followed up on would've been more recent.A lot of S3 is dependent on nostalgia.
At least we agree about that.S1 at least tried to tell an original story and do new things with the universe.
And I can't believe the hypocrisy of people who say PIC Season 3 is bad because it's "nostalgia" and then turn around and say "I can't wait to see Kirk meet Spock in Strange New Worlds!" Do you guys even hear yourselves? Do you not see the hypocrisy there? Do you all not see the double-standard?
Not you, in general. Sorry about that.Actually, I never wanted to see Kirk in SNW. So I’m not sure what your talking about here?
I think many people can agree that the Berman-era stagnation was brought about by forcing things into production too quickly, UPN putting a straightjacket on how the final two series could evolve, and the TNG films having far more executive interference than anything on the TV side. What makes the TOS films so different from TOS proper are the characters having 15-20 years of evolution in between. The TNG films couldn't even commit to Data having the emotion chip.So, no the TNG Cast is NOT what sealed the deal for me. It was that it was being done in the style of a TOS Movie. "TNG done in the style of a TOS Movie" is a combination we'd never seen before and it had me intrigued. I wanted to see how that would mix together. On top of the fact that I already liked Picard to begin with.
Maybe it's the soft reboot vs hard continuation?Star Trek relying on prequels was the nostalgia. "Let's go back to before TOS! Let's redo TOS! Let's see how it all leads into TOS!" And I can't believe the hypocrisy of people who say PIC Season 3 is bad because it's "nostalgia" and then turn around and say, "I can't wait to see Kirk meet Spock in Strange New Worlds!" Do you guys even hear yourselves? Do you not see the hypocrisy there? Do you all not see the double-standard?
It wouldn't be so bad if all of you weren't beating us over the head non-stop about nostalgia in PIC Season 3 while completely ignoring it in SNW or pretending it's something else when it's not.
It's also the same mystery box style that is often complained about of Season 1 and Discovery but accepted easier.Season 3 is a lumbering Frankenstein's Monster made up of parts from better things.
Yeah. I think the 20-year-gap benefitted Picard the same way that the 10-year-gap benefitted the TOS Movies.I think many people can agree that the Berman-era stagnation was brought about by forcing things into production too quickly, UPN putting a straightjacket on how the final two series could evolve, and the TNG films having far more executive interference than anything on the TV side. What makes the TOS films so different from TOS proper are the characters having 15-20 years of evolution in between. The TNG films couldn't even commit to Data having the emotion chip.
There's a little bit more to it than that, but essentially yes.Maybe it's the soft reboot vs hard continuation?
I mean, I'm pretty sure we vehemently disagree on DISCOVERY and PS1... but you've always been open about why those would likely prove divisive among the fanbase.But these people don't see it because they're stuck in one gear and one gear only. I think they're not getting it on purpose.
My biggest criticism of the "nostalgia " is because nothing feels earned. It's putting all the pieces back like little has changed in the lives of the characters and ends with a poker game.I mean, I'm pretty sure we vehemently disagree on DISCOVERY and PS1... but you've always been open about why those would likely prove divisive among the fanbase.
PS3 definitely has problems. The dark lighting, the swearing, the mystery box format... but those are all basically "yes, and..." ones, whereas the "nostalgia" one is more confusing for me. It seems pretty organic to the plot is a natural evolution to what was established in the 1980s-2000s. Whereas STLD is much more shameless about pulling the memberberry card without having it be an organic in universe evolution.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.