I have to say that the premise of Season 4 bugs the hell out of me. I think it's a matter of regional history and where the metaphor bends in the wrong way. Basically, I live in Appalachia and there's a lot of mining in our history. There's also a lot of horrifying pollution, deaths, and accidents that the corporations are responsible for out of negligence.
Basically, they don't bother to do due diligence and the lives of people are ruined.
10-C is portrayed as a bunch of innocent victims that the Federation make peaceful contact with. Except, they have destroyed worlds and killed billions that they only did because they didn't bother to properly investigate where their mining was going. They're told, they stop, and it's shown to be a happy ending.
But that's absolutely not a defense.
They're guilty of manslaughter and improper safety on a truly massive scale but we're just supposed to pretend that's okay. It feels like Star Trek is going, "Well, those corporations didn't KNOW those heavy metals would poison the community. They shouldn't suffer any penalties." It wouldn't be nearly so noticeable if not for the fact they're space miners too.
Anyone else agree?
Basically, they don't bother to do due diligence and the lives of people are ruined.
10-C is portrayed as a bunch of innocent victims that the Federation make peaceful contact with. Except, they have destroyed worlds and killed billions that they only did because they didn't bother to properly investigate where their mining was going. They're told, they stop, and it's shown to be a happy ending.
But that's absolutely not a defense.
They're guilty of manslaughter and improper safety on a truly massive scale but we're just supposed to pretend that's okay. It feels like Star Trek is going, "Well, those corporations didn't KNOW those heavy metals would poison the community. They shouldn't suffer any penalties." It wouldn't be nearly so noticeable if not for the fact they're space miners too.
Anyone else agree?