• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Season 1

I started watching TNG in season 3 and liked it well enough to catch it as I could.

One night, for reasons I never discovered, the station showed "Arsenal of Freedom". Wow! That was the episode that hooked me. When I run through TNG, some episodes are background noise, but I stop to watch Arsenal of Freedom.
 
All this and Vincent Schiavelli too.

That was a bonus cherry on top.

In retrospect, I think that's the reason I was hooked.

I have a soft spot for episodes that utilize the full cast well. DS9's "CIVIL DEFENSE" and "STARSHIP DOWN" get high marks from partly because of that.



Side note: I just realized the typo I made when you both quoted me. I have never rubbed TNG. :guffaw:
 
Angel One is something of a mixed bag. Little lines of dialogue sprinkled throughout lend pause for thought, while other lines are risible.

There's an interesting subversion, after Data starts to rattle off theoretical possibilities, Riker takes the lead and states with the colloquialism that they shouldn't be looking for problems. It's a subdued little scene, but for anyone who enjoys thinking into possibilities too much, this episode isn't devoid of nifty little moments - and there are more than you'd expect*, though it's too easy to see how they're easily overlooked... never mind this is not a season 1 story that is often revisited by fans.

A couple scenes also had me laughing at how bad it was, partly because the story HAS a fair amount of potential but seems to prefer gliding along with less than the sum of its parts.

Oh, here's one bit of the episode that leads to a fun yet surely-unintentional double entendre:

RIKER: Save us some deep powder.
WESLEY: No problem, sir. The holodecks have all you'll ever need.

Considering this is the second time in the show's run where a character** is soaking wet when leaving the room and the water doesn't magically disappear, you can bet 41 quatloos that replicator technology is involved. For a moment, I thought of an Orville reference except this is three decades too early, nor was it an intent to laud up comestibles made from illicit compounds***...

A shame he didn't order some up to go with Minuet... :razz::shifty::whistle::guffaw:


* we also have an early example of Geordi taking command and it looks like a good start ("Arsenal of Freedom" expands on this and in an interesting way), a decent sneeze, and more. But maybe not Beata complimenting Riker. She should be glad Riker isn't Khan!


** For both instances, it's Wesley. Go figure.. and if it's a metaphor of him "being wet" and in the UK, this is a derogatory slang term meaning he's a bit of a nit. Which otherwise seems impossible, given how often he can fix in two seconds what all the years'-trained chief engineers can't fathom in hours, much less fix. Is this the reason why season 1 really had such turnover, because Wesley would bebop in? Tune int next week for the answer; same batbleepcrazy time, same batbleepcrazy channel. :hugegrin: (P.S. Barclay at least didn't run off when he got the same treatment, and y'all know that Barclay was pretty much expressing what everyone else was... season 3 rocks. In terms of characterization and plotting, not for the use of rocks during battle scenes and thankfully nobody got bebopped on the head by one...)

***currently illicit for various deemed-applicable reasons... then again, it's an old claim that "cocaine was a thing in the 80s", and yet this isn't the after-school special episode featuring Yar appealing to Wesley who, had he lived in the 1980s (or even mid-1970s for that matter), would be encouraged to try doing it instead. Speaking of, Yar had a couple decent lines in "Angel One", but her character was too often sidelined or poorly written for. It's no wonder Denise left, but at least she waved...
 
All this and Vincent Schiavelli too.

He's also one of the highlights of "Tomorrow Never Dies", a James Bond film from the 1990s. But he's definitely got range and pulls of the salesman character with much aplomb. He's a highlight for "The Arsenal of Freedom", which is a story that has more going for it than TND has, but before I digress...
 
I will always stand by "Angel One" because it did something that later Trek couldn't: take a realistic look at the fight for equal rights for both sexes.
 
In the years prior to the debut of TNG, Trek (via the TOS films) had shifted heavily toward a focus on the Kirk/Spock relationship and explosive spaceship battles, so the debut of TNG—with its renewed focus on thoughtful explorations of deep space and what it means to be human—was a welcome change to this Trek fan.

Back in the autumn of 1987, it was especially symbolic to me that TNG re-used Jerry Goldsmith's theme from TMP over the opening titles, as this new series (especially the debut episode, Encounter at Farpoint) seemed more far more akin to the first Trek film than either TWOK or TSFS. TNG's first season was far from perfect but to me back in 1987 it was a welcome return to Trek's roots as thoughtful Science-Fiction and a respite from death & destruction that seemed to dominate most Trek films.

It's also worth noting that the original 26 episodes of TNG were created to induce local TV stations to keep buying the original 79-episode TOS syndication package (something which many had begun showing reluctance to do). So, if nothing else, the popular response to TNG's first season eventually made seasons 2-7 and all the new incarnations of Trek we have seen on TV since possible. That's reason enough to applaud it in my opinion.
 
I will always stand by "Angel One" because it did something that later Trek couldn't: take a realistic look at the fight for equal rights for both sexes.

I appreciate it for what it wants to do, but it's not without its share of stumbles and clunky moments...

It's imperfect, but - if engaging enough - it will make the audience think in different and new perspectives. If it falls flat, then you'll have YT reviews like from Lorerunner making other observations, and they wouldn't necessarily be wrong either. The real trick is to get viewers to put themselves in the place of the side they're not on and induce empathy, which can be done just as easily as creating a fictional environment as it does any contemporary soap opera. Well, the former takes more genuine talent for sci-fi when other planets and humanoid species are involved, but it's definitely not insurmountable. Regardless, it always boils down to show vs tell. I've seen other sci-fi work far better for show vs tell. Some British sitcoms from the 1990s do a far better job of showing issues. "Angel One" is toward the "tell vs show" side of the scale, but it's not entirely awful. Just clunky. It's also the same story that treats the sexism issue as glossed-over and vague as how the magical infection started, but individual scenes and set-pieces do sell the concept well enough.

But I digress.

The plight of Ramsey and his crew, as told by Ramsey, goes right back to the vague glossing over of so much potential. Instead of paraphrasing, I'll just borrow from the transcript:

RAMSEY: Five months in a rescue pod no bigger than this room is an eternity I hope none of you will ever have to face. When we finally made it here, we thought we'd died and gone to heaven. You've seen the women of the planet. They're tall and strong and lovely. But after the newness wore off, we started to see how the men were treated. There's no votes. There's no opinions. There's no respect.
That's virtually no different than meeting your future abusive ex from a dating website, save for changing one or two words if/as needed. (Never mind, the episode starts out with a long overdue visit - the seven year thing is a bit unusual, and for the claim of 20th century flapdoodle their disintegration machine is nothing of the sort anyone came up with in the 20th century - except for sci-fi plot trappings, but I digress.)

Add to that:

Captain's log, supplemental. Our away team has beamed down to an unusual matriarchal society where the female is as aggressively dominant as the male gender was on Earth hundreds of years ago. Here, the female is the hunter, the soldier, larger and stronger than the male. An arrangement considered most sensible and natural.​

Tell vs show.

The episode doesn't fail due to trying, but it definitely is clunky - and told at a 5th grade level, at best, mand ost 5th graders aren't going to have any more of a clue about that than they might for basic Calculus. Not just because of "unusual" implying a rather small total quantity. (also note: "Lonely Among Us" goes after vegetarians vs meat eaters, with no real point apart from having someone from each side how each side says the other is barbaric... except we get the Antican and Human griping over that, not the Selay - which would have elevated the point, much less begin to show one with some depth to it. Oh, the end of the episode is a bizarre ha-ha moment where it's revealed an Antican ate one of the Selay.)
Especially when they didn't show how men in their "arrangement" under the conditions that Ramsey was claiming, leading to hiding in some rocks where Mistress Beatta knew, right on cue, where to find the lot of them and without the means of the technically-advanced Enterprise. Now, we see the end result with them there in their clean and polished glory, sure, but not the in between stuff that would add the needed weight to the story's cause. It's storytelling by numbers. At least that not-a-20th-century-thingy death chamber plot device is painless and apparently merciful. The episode glosses over so much. Among other questions, just how many men break the law just to get a nice painless easy death? The story is still clunkier than a Model-T that's a century behind its oil change.

In the end, superficially told or otherwise, the episode still engenders thought and isn't in the "total stinker" pile, though "Justice" also has some similar "cool idea let down by a bad rewrite and production" and it's definitely lower on most viewers' lists than "Angel One" is. The story is definitely trying, but it easily could have been a lot more effective.

Never mind the Data subplot - with adds some zest to his calculating how much time Dr Crusher had but, right on cue, she finds the solution in just the nick of time, now cue end credits. This plot rushing wouldn't have been as much a quibble, had the time the script spent on the main issues came across with more deftness, poignancy and piquancy.

That said, I've rewatched "Angel One" far more times than season five examples such as "Ethics", where they do sell the plight of Worf's condition from both sides but then get far more glib than any season one story could ever have begun to have dreamt of. So it's not that bad.
 
There is a lot of quality stuff in season 1 it is just that a lot of the episodes have something which diminishes them in a distracting way like genius Wesley. But if you look past those things the episodes are more enjoyable.

Some are also just fun. But I also enjoy it a lot more now because of how many episodes set up future pay offs like the Traveller, Lore, and even the Klingons in hearts of glory.

Also, I still suspect that some day the aliens called at the end of conspiracy are going to show up and really do a number. I think they should be the big bad for season 3 of Picard. What a call back that would be!
 
I love angel one. "I can't believe this! You're going to parade around in that thing like you're one of them??!" I love how much it pisses Tasha off that Riker will dress in their customary garb and let himself be hit on by the leader.

And I love season 1, definitely more than 6 or 7. Season 1 has the adventure and mystery of TOS and the prime directive throes and ethical dilemmas that Picard is always going through give a lot of the foundation to Picard's character. I also miss the narrative element of season 1 that wore out later in the series.
 
I think season 1 is underrated. It’s a little sloppy compared to season 3-5 (and I like 6 +7) but it has some episodes which are really solid.

More importantly it sets up a lot of background for later on. From Lore and their loss over Tasha.

They all also grow over the first few seasons in a satisfying way in contrast.

A lot of missteps and episodes that are only so-so but it’s like an origin story. It’s satisfying to see it on your way to what comes next if you see it as a whole.

Also: “Ugly giant bags of mostly water." has been a family insult now for 30+ years :hugegrin:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top