• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Scream: The TV Series

The accomplice killed the killer to avoid incrimination?

But why stop the killer right before she completed the plan? And if Audrey had changed her mind about the plan, why wait until the last moment to take Piper out?

Unless the idea was to end up as the hero, saving the heroine at the last minute . . . ?
 
Maybe it's because Emma apologised a few episodes earlier about the video, and then Brooke tried to bond sincerely with her just before the final showdown?

It quelled her rage?
 
Why did Billy go overboard on stabbing Stu? Why did Mrs. Loomis kill Mickey? Killers always turn on their partners in this series, it's just what happens.

I really enjoyed the finale, for the first time I felt like I was watching a genuine slasher film. I hope they can keep this up with Season 2.
 
After marathon in the series and finding it...okay (or at least better than the last few seasons of American Horror Story), I was surprised to find this on TvTropes:

Harsher in Hindsight: Wes Craven died months after the series began, living just long enough to see one of his greatest creations be turned into something nigh-universally reviled.

I was wondering how true that statement was? Did the show do that badly in views or critical reception? Or is it just a contributor putting a little too much emphasis on their personal opinion? It hasn't aired in Australia yet, so I'm kind if behind on the sort of 'buzz' it managed to generate.

On this thread at least, the reception was mixed at worse.
 
After marathon in the series and finding it...okay (or at least better than the last few seasons of American Horror Story), I was surprised to find this on TvTropes:

Harsher in Hindsight: Wes Craven died months after the series began, living just long enough to see one of his greatest creations be turned into something nigh-universally reviled.

I was wondering how true that statement was? Did the show do that badly in views or critical reception? Or is it just a contributor putting a little too much emphasis on their personal opinion? It hasn't aired in Australia yet, so I'm kind if behind on the sort of 'buzz' it managed to generate.

On this thread at least, the reception was mixed at worse.

I'm not sure where they got that "universally-reviled" bit. If anything, the show seemed to be flying a little under some people's radar, but most of the people who were actually watching it seemed to be enjoying it.

And it's coming back for a second season, so . . ..
 
After marathon in the series and finding it...okay (or at least better than the last few seasons of American Horror Story), I was surprised to find this on TvTropes:

Harsher in Hindsight: Wes Craven died months after the series began, living just long enough to see one of his greatest creations be turned into something nigh-universally reviled.

I was wondering how true that statement was? Did the show do that badly in views or critical reception? Or is it just a contributor putting a little too much emphasis on their personal opinion? It hasn't aired in Australia yet, so I'm kind if behind on the sort of 'buzz' it managed to generate.

On this thread at least, the reception was mixed at worse.

I'd have thought Craven saw Freddy as his greatest creation. Besides, I'm sure he had bigger things to consider in his own life than how a shitty MTV teen tv show was faring.

But yeah, I gave up after about four episodes because it was just terrible!

:wtf:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top