For those of you who live in the U.S. and/or otherwise have an understanding of U.S. law, do you support the Equal Rights Amendment and why or why not?
Thank you so much, @Chilli for pointing out the "She's someone's..." nonsense and how it illustrates the issue of agency. I couldn't believe the obtuseness of that remark about not understanding what agency meant. The "She's someone's..." argument is one of the most common arguments against sexual assault there is, and the fact that most people don't even see a problem with it is truly distressing. I think this meme sums it up most aptly and succinctly:
![]()
For those of you who live in the U.S. and/or otherwise have an understanding of U.S. law, do you support the Equal Rights Amendment and why or why not?
For those of you who live in the U.S. and/or otherwise have an understanding of U.S. law, do you support the Equal Rights Amendment and why or why not?
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
It's academic, because there isn't even a snowball's chance in Hell of getting it passed. So, I don't know, "Good Job!"?Don't get me wrong, I am very much in favor of the ERA, but what would you tell to those who successfully killed it back in the 1970s and anyone who is against it today?
http://www.ushistory.org/us/57c.asp
Don't get me wrong, I am very much in favor of the ERA, but what would you tell to those who successfully killed it back in the 1970s and anyone who is against it today?
http://www.ushistory.org/us/57c.asp
I tend to think this part is a bit vague and would've led to court challenge after court challenge for every law Congress passed.
But I have no issue with the amendment overall.
A Congressional power of enforcement is included in a number of amendments to the United States Constitution. The language "The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation" is used, with slight variations, in Amendments XIII, XIV, XV, XVIII, XIX, XXIII, XXIV, and XXVI.
The people that killed the ERA were the same group of people that challenged and rallied against the social changes of the '60s. What's sad is how successful they were in curtailing women's and minorities rights while parlaying that animosity into the modern conservative movement in America.Don't get me wrong, I am very much in favor of the ERA, but what would you tell to those who successfully killed it back in the 1970s and anyone who is against it today?
http://www.ushistory.org/us/57c.asp
Not to be argumentative, but one of the things that I have noticed, with me, is that it helps me give definition to a relationship. If I think of someone as a person, that's one thing, but it is a bit of a cognitive moment. If I think of someone as my sister, that is a very emotional connection. It personalizes in a way that makes it meaningful to me.And I totally feel like "randomly" quoting @thestrangequark again.
It saddens me when men don't consider that, no matter how well-meaning they are.![]()
From TFWiki:Also Arcee must have been designed by movie people, possibly suits, not the toy company (verification?) although I imagine a dynamic synergy between the two creative shops (Cartoons/movies vs Toys).
And they were absolutely resistant to Arcee. I said I had a daughter who loves this stuff. There are other girls that like it. Put in a female Autobot! Ron Friedman, [1]
- Ron Friedman fought for Arcee's inclusion in The Transformers: The Movie because his daughter was a Transformers fan, but Hasbro/Sunbow were very resistant. [2]
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.