Try not to double post if you've got nothing to say. OK, sport?
Did somebody appoint you a moderator and didn't tell me?
Try not to double post if you've got nothing to say. OK, sport?
Try not to double post if you've got nothing to say. OK, sport?
Did somebody appoint you a moderator and didn't tell me?
If you're content with the broader sadistic appeal of whipping a mule up a hill, who am I to argue.
Nope.There's a difference between a delusion and genius, and that is someone is willing to pay for it.
Well that tosses most of your ideas out the window.If Star Trek is to remain Gene Rodenberry's creation, then it should uphold his ideals, and I don't pretend to know them all. If not, then it shouldn't be called Star Trek, but they should be indistinguishable.
Hows that working out for you?I'm only looking to use the ideas that sell. Besides how good can an idea be if it makes no money?
Besides how good can an idea be if it makes no money?
What would motivate someone to invest in a property they don't have the rights to? What if the series is a monster hit, with all sorts of possible spinoffs and merchandising sales? Now the investors look like idiots - CBS will profit from the hit they created.But what if, a majority of the funding for the series was put up by someone other than CBS...with CBS making a minimal investment and still maintaining rights to the franchise?
Look how much difficulty Lucas came up against when he wanted to make "Red Tails"?
What Trek needs is a back end pilot and that can only come from a prequel from another captain other than Kirk.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.