• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Save Robau's Wikipedia Entry!

There might be 50 words in the article worth keeping somewhere, in a minor characters or cast page. That section on the main movie page is cumbersome.
 
He's nowhere significant enough to have his own Wikipedia entry. He was in the movie for five damn minutes, people!

He's entry could easily be trimmed down to bare essentials and grouped with the Trek XI article or "other Trek characters" article.

Don't be such a Victor Meldrew.
 
Well, admittedly there isn't a whole lot about Robau NOW, but I can see some 'pre-movie' novel about the Kelvin and Kirk's poppa and Robau coming out in the near future, which could shed more light on the mysterious badass that is Robau!

Maybe someone needs to edit the article again and put in a link to the Robau Facts topic here! Or put all the Robau facts and contributors on a website so we can say "These are the facts!"
 
Robau haters should be-

1) Rejected for Borg assimilation and left to carry the burden for life

2) Fed to a mugato

3) Given Miri's disease and marooned on Delta Vega

4) Made to clip the toenaiils of ST 5's crewman Dax

5) Share a room with a Tellerite

6) ?????????
6) Injected with Orion's pheromones and stranded on Rura Penthe naked with a target tattooed on their asses and "Klingons are pussies" on their foreheads.
 
Robau haters should be-

1) Rejected for Borg assimilation and left to carry the burden for life

2) Fed to a mugato

3) Given Miri's disease and marooned on Delta Vega

4) Made to clip the toenaiils of ST 5's crewman Dax

5) Share a room with a Tellerite

6) ?????????

what about left in a room with Chuck Norris and Robau?
 
Robau haters should be-

1) Rejected for Borg assimilation and left to carry the burden for life

2) Fed to a mugato

3) Given Miri's disease and marooned on Delta Vega

4) Made to clip the toenaiils of ST 5's crewman Dax

5) Share a room with a Tellerite

6) ?????????

7) All of the above.
 
New and improved Robau is now sugar-free

Robau-haters should transwarp beamed right up a Gorn's ass along with Spot and a year-long supply of cat-nip.

We should just start our own Robau-wiki.
 
Robau is awsomeness in a can, no doubt about it, but only to those few who hath serverved abord the Trek BBS know the vaule of Robau. if the rest of the world want remain infidels so be it, keep the awsomeness at home and hopefully no one will be hurt for the trek BBS is the promised land of Sombreos and Robauism.....
 
Let me get an A-MEN!

Only on the TrekBBS can we talk about SombreoFleet, Robausims, Pikeisms and awesomeness and be accepted!
 
He's nowhere significant enough to have his own Wikipedia entry.

I don't see why Wikipedia has such strict notability guidelines towards certain articles anyway, while allowing other equally frivolous ones to remain. If it's an issue with the amount of available server space (which I've never noticed to be a problem for them so far, but I could be wrong) then it would seem the most logical step would be to prune articles based on amount of visits in combination with notability then, and only then; when it will soon become a size issue. For instance, you wouldn't want to prune an article on a real world school over an in-depth analysis of Jimmy JJ Walker's "Dy-no-mite!" catchphrase on 'Good Times' just because the latter gets slightly more visits.

If someone can write up an article about Captain Robau that fits all their other guidelines apart from the completely subjective notability one, then why not allow it? Isn't that the whole point of having an instantly expandable online encyclopedia? Having a hyperlink in the Trek XI article to a separate Captain Robau article doesn't disrupt anything, and if there's a readership for it, then it survives pruning. If not, it goes.

As it stands now the whole notability policy frequently comes down to some person who has a beef with the subject of the article making a stink about it, often repeatedly. It's totally subjective, frequently unfair, and often doesn't even make sense. Why shouldn't an individual website be able to have their own Wikipedia article if there's an audience for it? Why shouldn't someone be able to write an thoughtful analysis of some background character if they can do it within the guidelines?
 
I don't see why Wikipedia has such strict notability guidelines towards certain articles anyway...

Well, agreed. They've gotten down-right snooty in their handling of articles and such there.

"This is serious! We're an encylopedia."

Yeah, they're also on the internet. So...
 
I've edited wiki entries and they have stayed there form months. I even found out later that one of the entries I had made was not exactly correct but they did not take it down.

What is it that you guys do to attract wiki "mods" attention?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top