Saucer Separation

Discussion in 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' started by nonbelligerency, Feb 28, 2015.

  1. nonbelligerency

    nonbelligerency Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Location:
    Yeoman Atkins' Quarters
    I seem to remember a behind the screens revelation that the producers/whoever wanted the Enterprise D to separate during every battle scene. After learning how time consuming it was to separate the models, film and put it all together, this idea was abandoned.

    Did I imagine this or has someone else heard of this?
     
  2. Reaper63

    Reaper63 Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2010
    Location:
    Northerin NJ
    no, I heard the same thing, it just took the viewer out of the action from what I heard
     
  3. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    Like Voyager's movable nacelles, it was a cool new thing, only like you said, more time consuming.
     
  4. Hnic

    Hnic Cadet Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    I think that early on Picard was worried about loss of life since he lost the stargazer but as time went on they realized the saucer is a formidable weapon and power source. Think "best of both worlds"
     
  5. Marc

    Marc Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Location:
    Shinning Waters
    Not sure about the time to seperate the model - after all that's what stock footage is for but iirc it was more about slowing the story telling down.

    Though I'm sure they could short cut - have dialogue about doing a sauce sep, next scene and our heroes are fighting the enemy from the battle bridge.

    Just a thought though. If there were more sauce seperations I guess it would mean more battle bridge scenes - so would they have had to built a standing set? While the cost of the set construction could be covered over a number of eps, they might not have had the sound stage space.

    While the set could be taken up and down as needed, long term that could have beem more expensive (assembly time, plus wear and tear from being put up and taken down that would have be repaired).
     
  6. Mojochi

    Mojochi Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    I don't think episode time constraints are as big a concern as everyone makes out. Eventually, you just make a comment, & then BAM, the next scene is a battle bridge scene. It's a tv show

    I personally just think the benefits of separating only worked for certain circumstances, and in world time factors made it an obstacle to action & suspense in most others. Plus... the ship looked like crap without the saucer. It's a tv show. If you tune in, in the middle of an episode, to a space battle, you might stop to watch... unless the ship doesn't look like the Enterprise. "Then you're like what the crap is that ugly thing?"

    The look of the ship is signature to the show
     
  7. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    I guess the VFX alone would not play a role in this "slowing down the story" thing. As said, they could use arbitrarily short bits of footage - there are establishing shots of the starship between the bits of drama anyway - or skip exterior visuals altogether.

    But there's something to be said for not using the separation trick. After all, it involves quite a bit of deliberation. Should we drop the saucer now or later? Should it be dropped here or elsewhere? Is it safe now to come back for it? The ship would also usually literally have to backtrack in order to meet with the saucer again, while going forward is the dramatically more appealing choice.

    The writers sort of used up their dialogue options in "Heart of Glory" where Riker wonders whether the saucer should be separated and Picard says it's too soon as they don't know yet what they are facing. That basically covers all the angles: it's always going to be too early or too late, and there's little point discussing the latter case because it will only make the heroes look bad.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  8. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    Early concepts had a section of the ship (the Bridge and a portion of the saucer, presumably) separating as an individual fighting machine instead. Later it was nixed in favour of having that entire saucer split off, but that would have settled the problem of the additional Bridge set at least!
     
  9. Lance

    Lance Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Location:
    The Enterprise's Restroom
    This. :bolian: Like the moveable nacelles, or Voyager being able to land on planets, 'saucer sepper' was one of those "This Is A Cool Idea, Let's Show The Ship Doing X!" things, which new shows do once or twice to show that they can be done, but which are too impractical to actually do often, except on very special occasions.

    I do think they probably could have done the saucer seperation more often than they did, as I suspect there was plenty of stock footage taken of the models in 'sepper mode' during the original ILM shooting sessions for the pilot. But the real problem was that it was a narrative time-killer as much as anything else. It slowed down the storytelling too much, because suddenly you have to account for two ships instead of one. That's okay for something like The Best Of Both Worlds where it's an "event episode", but it's less applicable to your average week-to-week.

    Also, if they found the ILM stock footage didn't cover the practical needs of the weekly episode in question, then they'd have had to get the large version of the Enterprise model out of storage to shoot the new scenes (as the smaller shooting models couldn't do the seperation). All of that is time and money.

    If TNG had been born in the era of CGI, then I honestly reckon the saucer sepper would have been a more frequent occurence, without question. I mean, we even know of several occasions where it got discussed at the story breakdown stage, but got shot down on impractical grounds (the infamous one being the idea of ending season six on the cliffhanger of the saucer having to make emergency landing on a planet, which eventually got held over for Generations instead).
     
  10. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    They could have used the same bridge set for both. Different lighting, perhaps?
     
  11. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    Using the Main Bridge as the Battle Bridge (literally the same room, in universe) would have solved half the problems raised here, which stem from the fact that the TMP Bridge set was mostly rebuilt / unavailable throughout most of TNG's run. It got reused as so many other sets that there was virtually nothing left of it after BOBW.

    Give the saucer it's own control room and let the command crew stay in their own bridge without having to ride an elevator in the middle of a crisis. Yes you'd have to remove the Main Bridge from its "hood ornament" position atop the saucer, but where's the big deal with that? Bury the damn thing as deep as you can! ;)
     
  12. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    If you're worried about the bridge being taken out by weapons fire because it's so high up on the saucer: It's not the job of the ship's hull to protect the bridge. That's what shields are for. Any attack powerful enough to punch through a ship's shields can also take out the bridge, no matter where it is.

    As for the battle bridge, I wasn't suggesting that the main and battle bridges be literally the same room (in-universe), I'm not even sure how they could pull that off. I just suggested that they use the same SET for both. Creative lighting, maybe a few quickly installed/removed set panels, can do wonders.
     
  13. kirkfan

    kirkfan Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Yeah, aerodynamism in space...
     
  14. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Finding rationalizations for nonsensical starship features, and then failing to capitalize on those, appears to have been part of Trek from the get-go.

    The TOS ship wasn't allowed to be a flying saucer (because those were sooo 1950s), but it got a saucer hull nevertheless. Fine, have it be a giant separable frisbee that lands on planets. Except that was nixed because planetfall was expensive to shoot. Fine, reserve that as an emergency maneuver, never to actually be seen. Except even the very potential never made it into dialogue...

    At least the moving nacelles of Voyager were constantly used, making it into basically every going-to-warp scene even when the director could just have decided to skip going-to-warp establishing VFX altogether. Why they flapped like that, we never learned. But at least they didn't mysteriously stop doing it halfway through the first season. (Even though VOY would have had a perfect excuse for that - failure to find authorized repair shops in Delta!)

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  15. Mytran

    Mytran Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Location:
    North Wales
    On a ship the size of the TOS-E that is certainly true. A vessel the size of the E-D offers much greater protection from a piece of random fire flying in and puncturing that oh-so-vulnerable skylight of theirs! But really, that was only a side benefit of having a single main control centre for the ship (plus a navigation suite for the saucer in case of separation)

    I agree and if the TMP Bridge hadn't been sitting there on the soundstage already I expect that is what they might have done. My idea was along different lines, wherein the Main Bridge is located in/on the secondary hull somewhere (as per your point above re external or internal location). After all, the secondary hull is the "business" part of the ship, the saucer being more dedicated to living quarters and recreation facilities. The Main Bridge really ought to be where the main ship functions are concentrated, not miles away on top of a luxury hotel (so to speak) ;)

    Looking at the original multi-storey concept drawings of the Bridge I can understand why it might be better off in the saucer. But the single deck room we eventually got would be just as much at home atop the "cobra head" with very little tweaking. The observation lounge windows could even peep out the back still!
     
  16. kirkfan

    kirkfan Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    The Saucer separation doesn't make any sense. In a combat situation the saucer is a much easier target and is likely to be fired upon the moment it separates from the other section. So basically it means luring away enemy fire by sacrificing your children. Yeah, great move!:techman:

    :rolleyes:
     
  17. Wingsley

    Wingsley Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Location:
    Wingsley

    Timo mentions an interchange between Picard and Riker at the very beginning of "Heart of Glory":


    The episode apparently takes place in close proximity, if not within, the Romulan Neutral Zone. If there had been Romulan activity nearby, a saucer jettison would free up the stardrive section to investigate and deal with it, but it would also make the saucer vulnerable if it should happen upon other hostile starships.

    Still, the brief interchange between Riker and Picard seemed to just be more of an aside than a serious deliberation about actually separating. FWIW, I always took the notion of saucer separation to be a contingency that was situation-specific, not something they would automatically do.

    Later on, when the Enterprise-D Bridge crew discovers the approach of a Klingon cruiser and hails them, there is this exchange:

    This, to me, suggests a couple of things:

    First, it suggests that saucer separation is used as a military maneuver to allow the saucer to proactively separate safely away from a dangerous venue so that the stardrive section can preform whatever aggressive action is needed without disturbing operations within the saucer-hull.

    Second, the notion of "bulk" comes into play. Apparently, Worf is suggesting that saucer separation relieves the stardrive section of "bulk", meaning the "bulk" of a Galaxy-class starship is in the saucer, not the stardrive section of the ship. (This plainly contradicts what Sternbach and Okuda asserted in the TNG Writer's Technical Manual, and later in their published TNG Tech Manual, about the stardrive section housing a huge volume of deuterium and antimatter for warp drive fuel.)

    Also consider this exchange from "Heart of Glory":


    I quote this passage because it seems to reinforce the previous quote. Taken separately, it doesn't say much. But taken in the context of the episode and what Worf told Korris earlier, it seems to reinforce the notion that separation liberates the stardrive section to preform military tasks.


    Now, consider this scene from the following episode, "Arsenal of Freedom":

    I added underlining for emphasis to show that LaForge's orders and rationale are designed to accomplish two things: (1: LaForge wants to remove the Enterprise-D from the battle scene before jettisoning the saucer; possibly outside of the Minosian star system... and (2: LaForge wants Logan to pilot the saucer to a starbase, just in case the Enterprise stardrive section does not succeed; LaForge is setting the saucer up to be a civilian escape vehicle.

    There is one major flaw, though, in the notion of saucer separation: impulse power. Is a Galaxy-class saucer only capable of relatively low-speed maneuvers? Is it sublight-only? If so, how is Mr. Logan ever going to reach that starbase before the saucer's viability expires? The starship Defiant in DS9 shows us that Federation technology can build warp engines into an armored hull. If we assume that a Galaxy-class saucer actually has a pair of small warp nacelles built-into her saucer hull, then it is possible that Logan would be able to reach his base even if LaForge failed in his mission.

    I bring this up because starships are supposed to be deep space vehicles. They fly, by definition, outside of their home space. Why would we not assume that a saucer-separation, under proper circumstances, would be a realistic strategy for a starship commander to employ while on the frontier?
     
  18. kirkfan

    kirkfan Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    If the saucer section is sublight speed only that means that wherever you are you likely won't get to any habitable planet before years have come and gone. The only hope is to be rescued by another ship and depending on where you are that could take years as well.
     
  19. tharpdevenport

    tharpdevenport Admiral Admiral

    I'm glad the decision was made to not seperate it all the time. Aisde from the gimmick loosing it's special magic if done all the time, stock footage being used al lthe time would have worn it's welcome and made it seem more like TOS TV. Of course there wre certain composite iamges that were reused with different images behind it, like a different planet, but a battle is something special and you want to see something cool done, not the same shots you've seen before in the last battle with a saucer speration.


    I wonder, on a side note, if the Enterprise D can jettison it's nacelles, like Kirk almsot did once or twice in the original series.
     
  20. Ithekro

    Ithekro Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Location:
    Republic of California
    The bridge being on top of the vessel (or at minimum accessible from the outside) would make it easier to replace with new technologies, or jettison it as some sort of lifeboat. Having it deep within the hull and heavily protected would mean gutting the ship just to replace the bridge should the old one be obsolete or damaged.

    Also, there really isn't a safe place on an unshielded starship from heavy weapons.