Captain Styles, USS Excelsior. He never lost anyone, never left the Earth system, and was never shown taking his crew into any armed conflict. 

Honestly, I put Sisko.
Considering the Dominion War, it's astonishing he had very few deaths under his command. He is clearly a good tactician if he can engage in warfare with an enemy that is equal on all fronts and superior in some and usually brings everyone home again. And let's face it... the Defiant was not to be messed with. Let's give credit to her, too.
Archer had more deaths in one year than I think Sisko had in two years of the Dominion War, the most devastating war to happen in the Alpha Quadrant.
I almost voted Picard, but I just couldn't get past the Enterprise blowing up over and over again.
The same with Janeway. Multiple destructions of the ship.
And Kirk was a definite no for me, given his redshirt count. But I will say this about Kirk... he did what no other Starfleet captain could do.
He had surge protectors throughout his ship, preventing life threatening explosions to his crew.
Considering she was lost on the other side of the galaxy with no resources, no contact with SF, no diplomatic relations, no map, all in a diddy little ship I'd have to say she has mitigating circumstances, not to mention we have no idea how many the other captains lost off screen. In Janeways' case we know exactly how many she lost because replacements wouldn't have been available.
Captain Styles, USS Excelsior. He never lost anyone, never left the Earth system, and was never shown taking his crew into any armed conflict.![]()
Captain Styles, USS Excelsior. He never lost anyone, never left the Earth system, and was never shown taking his crew into any armed conflict.![]()
In my headcanon, Styles murdered his helmsman and engineering staff with his little baton in a blind rage of madness and hatred after he failed to pursue the Enterprise successfully.
That doesn't sound very safe to me.
Just sayin'
You are wrong about Sisko. Sisko sometimes had other ships under his command in battle. Like in "Sacrifice of Angles" where 600 Starfleet ships battled 1,200 Dominion & allied ships. Ships were exploding like crazy during that battle, each one taking out its crew of tens, hundreds, or thousands of persons.
And it looked like Sisko, despite being a lowly captain, was in command of the entire Federation fleet of 600 ships. And even if someone else was in command of the entire fleet, Sisko seemed to give orders to an entire squadron that broke through the Dominion lines and headed for DS9. So if just one of the ships in Sisko's squadron was destroyed Sisko would have lost far more subordinates than any other captain and series protagonist. And if Sisko was somehow in command of the entire 600 ship fleet - which he certainly seemed to me to be the situation - he probably lost many thousands of subordinates in that one battle.
Actually, one thing which people complain about was the somewhat inconsistent number of crew members reported in various Voyager episodes. That makes me think we don't know exactly how many crew members Janeway lost.
Styles is not one of the choices available. Anyway, nobody knows how long Styles was captain of Excelsior or what adventures he had or how many crew members did during his command, because it all happened off screen.
Well, the chance to save 1 of them. Also one of the riskiest moves by any captain ever. She moved on from saving any others who died during the journey, but I appreciate the sentiment behind what you're saying.Totally Janeway. She took them across an alien Quadrant alone and when some of them died she went back and tag teamed her previous self to give them another chance at life.
What happened off-screen isn't canon, so I'm correct. But also, I was pretty clearly kidding.Styles is not one of the choices available. Anyway, nobody knows how long Styles was captain of Excelsior or what adventures he had or how many crew members did during his command, because it all happened off screen.
To be psycho and have moral values... seriously? I wonder if Janeway were not a woman would she be thrown the description 'psycho' so casually given it is short for being a psychopath or having some form of an actual medical condition like psychosis.Janeway was most psycho of all the captains and her moral values were more important than everything and everyone.
I wonder if anyone has ever done a head count from all the Trek versions to see who has the best statistics? End of the day stuff too because one can't really discount or include redundant parallel universes or timelines.One reason I don’t consider Janeway is she took more radical risks. She values getting home more than staying alive and relied on luck more often like in the 1:20 chance in Scientific Method.
If you took all parallel universes I think Janeway has more average deaths than other captains.
To be psycho and have moral values... seriously? I wonder if Janeway were not a woman would she be thrown the description 'psycho' so casually given it is short for being a psychopath or having some form of an actual medical condition like psychosis.
Fair enough, sekundantAs someone who was fan of ST from childhood and later became an engineer at one faculty after eleven years first female graduate, I always dreamed from a female captain/leader. And TPTB gave me a psycho and I can say call her with her name. I do not care about all those politically correctness things. Two-three centuries after all those great enlightenment philosophers, I will let from no one dictate to me word taboos, sorry! And I am not saying this at the concept of N word (), if I wouldn't be a woman I can call her still "psycho".
And yes, even psychos can have their own moral values. No need to read some scientific papers, alone popular culture has some great contributions about the topic, who can forget the series "Dexter" or "Hannibal" ?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.