I haven't seen this point raised in reviews or in what I have read here.
My question is, why would Kirk expect Marcus to spare his crew?
Captain Kirk was seen as reckless by many in the brass. After the events at Nibiru, a tribunal is held at which it is decided that Kirk will be stripped of his ship and his command, and sent back to the Academy.
Later, Admiral Pike convinces Marcus to reinstate Kirk as Pike's first officer. Pike is killed, and Kirk takes his position as commander of the Enterprise.
Kirk talks to Marcus. Marcus doesn't need much convincing to authorize the mission to Qo'nos, and to help Kirk with his mission, he lends him 72 advanced torpedoes. Marcus is already working on the basis that Kirk is seen as a reckless commander, and Marcus has a secret agenda - start a war with the Klingons.
So, the Enterprise is sent with a core that is later revealed to be sabotaged by Section 31. The ship breaks down near the or in Klingon space. If Kirk had obeyed the Admiral's orders, the Klingons would have located the attacking ship and destroy the Enterprise. The attack would be attributed to a reckless commander. The ship and crew were expendable.
So, when confronted with the very man who sent him here, and for whom Khan identified as the one who ordered the sabotage of the Enterprise, and when the Admiral doesn't deny his involvement with the warp core sabotage, why did Kirk feel then that he could reason with this man and save his crew? To the admiral, the ship was expendable.
(I wish that Kirk was more reflective on this. His behavior was used against him by someone else in a position of authority, and his behavior would have resulted in the loss of the ship and crew.)
My question is, why would Kirk expect Marcus to spare his crew?
Captain Kirk was seen as reckless by many in the brass. After the events at Nibiru, a tribunal is held at which it is decided that Kirk will be stripped of his ship and his command, and sent back to the Academy.
Later, Admiral Pike convinces Marcus to reinstate Kirk as Pike's first officer. Pike is killed, and Kirk takes his position as commander of the Enterprise.
Kirk talks to Marcus. Marcus doesn't need much convincing to authorize the mission to Qo'nos, and to help Kirk with his mission, he lends him 72 advanced torpedoes. Marcus is already working on the basis that Kirk is seen as a reckless commander, and Marcus has a secret agenda - start a war with the Klingons.
So, the Enterprise is sent with a core that is later revealed to be sabotaged by Section 31. The ship breaks down near the or in Klingon space. If Kirk had obeyed the Admiral's orders, the Klingons would have located the attacking ship and destroy the Enterprise. The attack would be attributed to a reckless commander. The ship and crew were expendable.
So, when confronted with the very man who sent him here, and for whom Khan identified as the one who ordered the sabotage of the Enterprise, and when the Admiral doesn't deny his involvement with the warp core sabotage, why did Kirk feel then that he could reason with this man and save his crew? To the admiral, the ship was expendable.
(I wish that Kirk was more reflective on this. His behavior was used against him by someone else in a position of authority, and his behavior would have resulted in the loss of the ship and crew.)