I dont think D+ existed back then...Disney really missed the boat. They should have gotten involved during the Matt Smith era, when the show surged in popularity in the US.
I thought they were budgeting more because they looked like they were $10 million per episode seasons.IIRC the Moffat/Chibnall episodes were about 1.5 each, give or take. I remember TNG back in the day was like almost $2 mil per episode.
Has to happen!Moffat right now:
I thought they were budgeting more because they looked like they were $10 million per episode seasons.
I meant 'that' sentence for the Moffat/Chibnall era.RTD debunked the '10m per episode' thing very shortly after the Disney+ partnership was announced.
RTD has reportedly said that it was "a nice little bit of money, more than we had before"Deadline, in their article on why Disney was less than enthused, says it was closer to $8.5 million an episode.
![]()
Why Disney Ditched ‘Doctor Who’: Sources Say Ratings, Big Ticket Budget & MAGA Politics Were Factors In BBC Deal Failing To Regenerate
The BBC confirmed on Tuesday that its 'Doctor Who' co-production deal with Disney had vaporized. What went wrong on the series starring Ncuti Gatwa?deadline.com
Which still boggles the mind.
It didn't, but that was still the time for a big American super conglomerate to get in...I dont think D+ existed back then...
Hell, "The Interstellar Song Contest" could work on a lesser budget and still feel at home.One positive from that Deadline article is that fact that Who doesn't necessarily need millions and millions thrown at it to make decent episodes. It might just mean more eps like 73 Yards and less like The Interstellar Song contest.
Hell, "The Interstellar Song Contest" could work on a lesser budget and still feel at home.
Honestly, say what you want about the CC era and I’m not a fan, but it generally looked great IMHO
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.