This was the episode where Worf was put on trial and accused of killing several hundred Klingon civilians when he ordered the Defiant to fire at what he thought was a Klingon Bird of Prey decloaking.
It turned out to be a setup. A propaganda ploy by the Klingons.
The problem is.................it DOES NOT WORK the way it was shown in the episode.
The setup is wholly dependent on the Klingons knowing FOR CERTAIN when Worf will figure out the pattern of the Bird of Prey firing, cloaking, and decloaking.
If Worf had figured out the pattern one step earlier, the Defiant would've destroyed the Klingon Bird of Prey as they had planned.
If Word had NOT figured out the pattern when he did, the Klingon cargo ship would've decloaked in the middle of the battle for all to see.
And the Klingon setup would've been fully revealed.
The figuring out of the pattern took place ENTIRELY in Worf's head. There was no way for the Klingons to know when he had caught on. Thus they had no way of knowing when to put the Klingon cargo ship in position.
Thus, the entire scenario for "Rules of Engagement" is fatally flawed.
I'm surprised no one say this when it was written.
It turned out to be a setup. A propaganda ploy by the Klingons.
The problem is.................it DOES NOT WORK the way it was shown in the episode.
The setup is wholly dependent on the Klingons knowing FOR CERTAIN when Worf will figure out the pattern of the Bird of Prey firing, cloaking, and decloaking.
If Worf had figured out the pattern one step earlier, the Defiant would've destroyed the Klingon Bird of Prey as they had planned.
If Word had NOT figured out the pattern when he did, the Klingon cargo ship would've decloaked in the middle of the battle for all to see.
And the Klingon setup would've been fully revealed.
The figuring out of the pattern took place ENTIRELY in Worf's head. There was no way for the Klingons to know when he had caught on. Thus they had no way of knowing when to put the Klingon cargo ship in position.
Thus, the entire scenario for "Rules of Engagement" is fatally flawed.
I'm surprised no one say this when it was written.