• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

round or oval shape

Round.

Any other shape looks as though the designers are being forced into having a saucer section even if they don't want it.

Also, there has to be a clearly definable 'neck'. This modern trend of sleek starships sucks ass.
 
I would like to see an edited version of the D with a rounded saucer just to confirm it, but I like the round design.

Well, the D looks "round" in most shots (from the front or side), only really revealing the oval from looking down or up at it. I think a circlular saucer on the D would throw it off, making it look either too narrow from the front or too long from the side.

Also, there has to be a clearly definable 'neck'. This modern trend of sleek starships sucks ass.

Structurally, necks don't make sense.

Perhaps, but they look graceful. I'll bet they're a whole lot more difficult to design as well.
 
Well, the D looks "round" in most shots (from the front or side), only really revealing the oval from looking down or up at it.

So true. I didn't realize until recently that the D saucer wasn't round! I still think it's the most graceful of the ships, so my answer has to be... oval.
 
Well, the D looks "round" in most shots (from the front or side), only really revealing the oval from looking down or up at it.

So true. I didn't realize until recently that the D saucer wasn't round! I still think it's the most graceful of the ships, so my answer has to be... oval.
Yeah, same here. The oval meant from side shots it appeared different widths depending on the angle, so in turning movements it maintained visual balance but also made it dynamic. Probert's a master of design form, and to think he did it without 3d software...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top