I think if the 37's would have happened later in the series we might have seen that. But the episode didn't take place all that long after they were swept into the DQ, so the crew was still anxious to find that shortcut home.
If anything I see it the other way around... After years on Voyager, they became a family...I think if the 37's would have happened later in the series we might have seen that. But the episode didn't take place all that long after they were swept into the DQ, so the crew was still anxious to find that shortcut home.
Maybe, but they had hope of moving forward... They were thrown forward 10,000 ltyrs by Kes... they used a transwarp drive to move forward another couple of thosand ltyrs on more than one occasion... so they were making progress home. IIRC, they had traveled about half way home in 7 years... if you had family at home, I doubt you would want to stay behind!^ I can see that point too. But after 6 or 7 years of friends dying, constant battles to survive, and still being decades away from home I can see some crew getting tired and wanting to settle down on a nice planet. Especially if, as I'm sure happened, some crew became couples and started thinking about starting a family. The 37's planet might have been tempting then.
I've read Moore's comments wrt Voyager and I think he was right on the money. Berman and Braga should've listened to him.
I think we might very well get answers to the questions so far unanswered regarding the origins of the Cylons, their God, and yes why they attacked the colonies and broke the 40 year Armistice etc as we head into the final stretch. But I do think trying to go back and examine certain actions taken by the Cylons against the colonials believing they were part of a well-organized overarching plan for some unknown goal is pretty pointless because most of them would be revealed as existing just to serve as a plot point at that moment for the purposes of that particular episode. BSG is not Lost or Heroes when it comes to sophisticated interconnected plotting and it is one of my beefs with BSG. It is nowhere the smooth narrative that the other two are in my opinion.But VOY also had the advantage of not having a premise that is mangled from the start - there never has been an adequate explanation for the Cylons' attack on the Colonies - and with a big chunk of logic missing from the series' start, the plotline will never make sense.
I think we might very well get answers to the questions so far unanswered regarding the origins of the Cylons, their God, and yes why they attacked the colonies and broke the 40 year Armistice etc as we head into the final stretch. But I do think trying to go back and examine certain actions taken by the Cylons against the colonials believing they were part of a well-organized overarching plan for some unknown goal is pretty pointless because most of them would be revealed as existing just to serve as a plot point at that moment for the purposes of that particular episode. BSG is not Lost or Heroes when it comes to sophisticated interconnected plotting and it is one of my beefs with BSG. It is nowhere the smooth narrative that the other two are in my opinion.But VOY also had the advantage of not having a premise that is mangled from the start - there never has been an adequate explanation for the Cylons' attack on the Colonies - and with a big chunk of logic missing from the series' start, the plotline will never make sense.
Well I guess I've just become more patient thanks to my experience with a show like Lost where answers might not be forthcoming for years. But I can understand your frustration because unlike Lost or Heroes, BSG doesn't provide a constant flow of new mysteries to keep you constantly feeling satisfied even though other mysteries might be set aside for periods of time. I've learned to really appreciate the way the show is crafted and assembled in a very skillfully and methodical way.We've been pretty much saying that for 5 years and we still have to wait till 2009 to pretty much get what this damn series is about. I say too damn little, too damn late.
Well I guess I've just become more patient thanks to my experience with a show like Lost where answers might not be forthcoming for years. But I can understand your frustration because unlike Lost or Heroes, BSG doesn't provide a constant flow of new mysteries to keep you constantly feeling satisfied even though other mysteries might be set aside for periods of time. I've learned to really appreciate the way the show is crafted and assembled in a very skillfully and methodical way.We've been pretty much saying that for 5 years and we still have to wait till 2009 to pretty much get what this damn series is about. I say too damn little, too damn late.
Agreed. I look back at the first half of season 4, and I wonder why episodes like Road Less Traveled were needed at all. I mean they had a great opportunity to reveal something in terms of the relationship between Leoban and Kara and how they connected in Maelstrom but they used the episode to show your random mutiny. How does that advance the plot or how is it interesting. I mean either escape volocity and road less traveled or Road Less Traveled and Faith could have been combined. It also doesn't help that the one episode Nana Visitor was in was quite interesting but too short. We only met her once and it wasn't long enough to really believe the character or feel sympathetic to them or what they go through.It probably also doesn't help that BSG's mythology isn't nearly as compelling or intriguing as Lost or Heroes' mythologies. Plot, interesting villians, pacing clearly aren't Moore's strong suites but in his defense I definitely see his writers pulling the threads together and I can see on the horizon answers forthcoming about the history of the Seven and the Five along with the force manipulating everyone.
Well for the purposes of this discussion I was pretty much referring to season one of Heroes. I know many hate season two but it isn't IMO nearly as bad as many say. It certainly had its missed opportunities and threads that never went far enough or panned out.I don't watch lost, but I wouldn't put Heroes in as a show that has a good flow.
Well I actually sorta liked The Road Less Traveled. As for the relationship between Leoben and Starbuck we pretty much already have seen all we needed to in the previous appearances and I'm pretty sure that wasn't Leoben in Maelstrom.I look back at the first half of season 4, and I wonder why episodes like Road Less Traveled were needed at all. I mean they had a great opportunity to reveal something in terms of the relationship between Leoban and Kara and how they connected in Maelstrom
Well I didn't find the fact that we hadn't seen her character before to have lessened my sympathy for her plight any more than it did in an episodic series where a guest character is introduced for just that hour.We only met her once and it wasn't long enough to really believe the character or feel sympathetic to them or what they go through.
Absolutely. He bites off more than he can chew and ends up spitting most of it out.He doesn't seem to know how to follow through on different things (even though Home was a very good end to that one arc) and could be better.
This is the internet.then have fans say BSG is what voyager should have been when BSG isn't perfect in it's own right.
[/quote]Agreed. I look back at the first half of season 4, and I wonder why episodes like Road Less Traveled were needed at all. I mean they had a great opportunity to reveal something in terms of the relationship between Leoban and Kara and how they connected in Maelstrom but they used the episode to show your random mutiny. How does that advance the plot or how is it interesting. I mean either escape volocity and road less traveled or Road Less Traveled and Faith could have been combined.It probably also doesn't help that BSG's mythology isn't nearly as compelling or intriguing as Lost or Heroes' mythologies. Plot, interesting villians, pacing clearly aren't Moore's strong suites but in his defense I definitely see his writers pulling the threads together and I can see on the horizon answers forthcoming about the history of the Seven and the Five along with the force manipulating everyone.
I don't know. I really liked "Faith" and mourned Nana's character at the end. It was a touching story and I disagree that she needed to be around for more than a single episode for the audience to establish a connection. Too, there is this tendency from fans to want more more more more of everything. That wasn't needed here.It also doesn't help that the one episode Nana Visitor was in was quite interesting but too short. We only met her once and it wasn't long enough to really believe the character or feel sympathetic to them or what they go through.
That was SciFi's call, not the writers. Just sayin'.I don't want to carry this off topic, but yeah it is fruastrating when this is the final season, you say all will be revealed, we wait a whole year for the show to even come back, and now we wait another half year for things to be revealed.
1) I don't think Ron Moore ever once said that he felt Battlestar was "perfect". If anything, he rakes himself over the coals in his podcasts whenever he watches something he didn't like or later regretted doing. As for fans calling it "perfect" when compared to Voyager, how exactly is that Ron's fault? How exactly did he "have" the fans do that? Am I not actually enjoying the show and appreciating it of my own volition? Am I somehow being compelled by Ron Moore's evil voodoo?Also, what right does he have to bash the guy who allowed him to come onto voyager and then have fans say BSG is what voyager should have been when BSG isn't perfect in it's own right.
IGNFF: Transitioning back to the end of your tenure on Star Trek, what exactly happened with Voyager?
MOORE: It was a bad fit. There was a split between Brannon and I. I think I wasn't smart enough to realize that… Brannon and I were partners, we were co-equals, but I was sort of the senior partner by default, just because I had been there a year, and I was older. It wasn't that I was in charge of Brannon or he worked for me – by any stretch. We were partners, but it was a little bit that I was the more senior writer of the two. And when I went over to Voyager, he was in charge and I was the second banana, and it wasn't a good fit for either one of us. Brannon did not react well to the situation and mishandled it in some ways, and I chafed against it and ultimately just blew up, and said, "I can't work like this. I'm outta here." And I asked out of my contract and left. It was very painful. It was a very difficult thing. I tried not to be bitter at the time, but I was kinda bitter. I was kinda angry. I was not happy about what had happened, and it took awhile for Brannon and I to repair our friendship – but we did. These things happen, and I don't hold it against him. I had dinner with him a month-or-so ago, and we're still friends, but we're not writing partners anymore.
IGNFF: Transitioning back to the end of your tenure on Star Trek, what exactly happened with Voyager?
MOORE: It was a bad fit. There was a split between Brannon and I. I think I wasn't smart enough to realize that… Brannon and I were partners, we were co-equals, but I was sort of the senior partner by default, just because I had been there a year, and I was older. It wasn't that I was in charge of Brannon or he worked for me – by any stretch. We were partners, but it was a little bit that I was the more senior writer of the two. And when I went over to Voyager, he was in charge and I was the second banana, and it wasn't a good fit for either one of us. Brannon did not react well to the situation and mishandled it in some ways, and I chafed against it and ultimately just blew up, and said, "I can't work like this. I'm outta here." And I asked out of my contract and left. It was very painful. It was a very difficult thing. I tried not to be bitter at the time, but I was kinda bitter. I was kinda angry. I was not happy about what had happened, and it took awhile for Brannon and I to repair our friendship – but we did. These things happen, and I don't hold it against him. I had dinner with him a month-or-so ago, and we're still friends, but we're not writing partners anymore.
I still think his ego got in the way. He's a senior writing by default even though it was Brannon's show? Ah, ok, whatever.
Sounds like both of their egos got in the way ALOTSounds to me like both their ego's got in the way a bit,
I don't think there are too many other facts to really consider. On TNG, Moore had seniority and was more of a mentor... I'm sure Braga learned from him, and Moore guided him well. Fast forward, and now Braga is the senior partner and Moore has to take direction from him... I'm sure it was difficult for Braga to try to "guide" his former leader, and to deal with ideas that Brannon didn't think were right for the show, or ideas that they couldn't follow because of network rules... and I am almost certain that Moore didn't react well to being told "no" by someone who he saw as beneath him.but I don't think that's something to hold against either one of them absent any other facts.
They need to be confident... but sometimes, they can learn a lot by listening to others.A good creative person needs a healthy ego, I think.
I don't think there are too many other facts to really consider.
They need to be confident... but sometimes, they can learn a lot by listening to others.
Bullshit. Considering Moore's mixed handling of DS9 and BSG, I really do not see how VOY could have benefited from Moore's continuing influence with the show.I've read Moore's comments wrt Voyager and I think he was right on the money. Berman and Braga should've listened to him.
Frankly, I think he's overrated not only by the media and some of the TREK fans, but by Moore himself.
even if half the time he's discussing how he could have done something better... or how he fucked something up...you got that right, he's his own best pr
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.