I am always bewildered at how quickly people dismiss what Keith Richards did. Is it because he doesn't play a lot of solos, people think what he did was easy? Because let me tell you: It isn't. I just got a birthday present of the BD of the Stones' 1978 "Some Girls" tour, and the way he drives the rhythm with Charlie, trades guitar lines back and forth with Woody, breaks out little leads and pops right back into the rhythm is a joy to behold. And lest someone think it's easier to play rhythm parts in DGDBD, I'd point to "Monkey Man," IMO one of the slickest rhythm guitar parts in their whole catalogue, which was standard tuning. I'm not saying he should be as high as he is on the list, but I'm not saying he shouldn't, either!
I had a similar revelation in the last few years (though not because of a broken speaker!), and agree totally. He had a great ear for chords, like the D maj-whatever on "Here Comes the Sun." His playing was elegantly voiced and never any "slop" in it. When collaborating dried up and things split into strictly "John songs" and "Paul songs," it couldn't have easy to be the guitar player between, but wow did he pull it off. His slide touch later on was also very precise.
Howlin' Wolf was a big, imposing, maybe scary guy, and Sumlin came up with guitar parts to match him. I love his playing.
I love listening to his parts, they never sound old.
Joni Mitchell: Not always my cup of tea, but her early records with mostly her own acoustic accompaniment have some pretty impressive stuff. She has some sophisticated and original chord voicings, she can really fill out an arrangement.
Willie Nelson: Totally idiosyncratic style and sound (not to mention his eroding classical Martin), you know him anywhere within a couple of notes. His jazzy improvising is never predictable, I'd love to be able to come up with some of the stuff he does.
Justin
I have always been a big Beatles fan but used to say that as instrumentalists, they were much more about the service of their songs than anything else. But I wake up to this Beatles show on Sunday mornings and I listen on this little stereo radio with one speaker that doesn't work. That speaker being out allows me to sometimes hear only the guitar and drums or only the vocals, whichever. Anyway, I have heard a lot more of George's playing than I ever used to and lets just say that because of this I have no problem with his inclusion and position on the list.
I had a similar revelation in the last few years (though not because of a broken speaker!), and agree totally. He had a great ear for chords, like the D maj-whatever on "Here Comes the Sun." His playing was elegantly voiced and never any "slop" in it. When collaborating dried up and things split into strictly "John songs" and "Paul songs," it couldn't have easy to be the guitar player between, but wow did he pull it off. His slide touch later on was also very precise.
One of the great innovators in blues playing. Didn't know he died. Very sorry to hear it.
Howlin' Wolf was a big, imposing, maybe scary guy, and Sumlin came up with guitar parts to match him. I love his playing.
Finally, J.T.B. - your shout out to Jimmy "Shank" Nolen, a guitarist who gets no attention, made me smile. Believe it or not, as I was writing this post, a commercial came on T.V. with "Willie and the and Jive" (not the original) playing in the background. Pretty sweet.
I love listening to his parts, they never sound old.
Joni Mitchell: Not always my cup of tea, but her early records with mostly her own acoustic accompaniment have some pretty impressive stuff. She has some sophisticated and original chord voicings, she can really fill out an arrangement.
Willie Nelson: Totally idiosyncratic style and sound (not to mention his eroding classical Martin), you know him anywhere within a couple of notes. His jazzy improvising is never predictable, I'd love to be able to come up with some of the stuff he does.
Justin