Anyone have any links to them?Back in 1983 certain cuts of the film had this extra footage. I saw it in the cut that I viewed at the theater back then. There are articles online about it.
Anyone have any links to them?Back in 1983 certain cuts of the film had this extra footage. I saw it in the cut that I viewed at the theater back then. There are articles online about it.
What versions are those?
Everything I've ever seen or read has it that nothing of substance was altered between the theatrical release and the VHS/laserdisc releases. So feel free to over solid proof to the contrary if you can.Back in 1983 certain cuts of the film had this extra footage. I saw it in the cut that I viewed at the theater back then. There are articles online about it.
I mean I'm sure it could be even better than it was but there's no canon violations there.Clearly few are bothered by this as much as I am, so there isn't much use in me continuing to try to convince anyone that "it would have been better if X."
Fair enough. Even those versions (from what I remember) gave Leia a plausible, if weak, cover story at least and didn't have her as part of the Rebel Fleet.
Clearly few are bothered by this as much as I am, so there isn't much use in me continuing to try to convince anyone that "it would have been better if X."
That airlock wasn't on the top, but the port side and it's pretty obvious on the model (right on the cross-piece that the sensor dish sits on top of.) There really isn't anywhere aft where an airlock could go; it's all thruster nozzles back there. Remember these ships are pretty small (only two and a bit decks IIRC) and the general layout is pretty well established.^ Maybe Tantive IV has multiple airlocks, and which one is used depends on the ship it's docked with.
I mean, if it only had the airlock on the top (like we see in ANH), then it couldn't dock with the ship we see it undock from in R1. And vice versa.
IIRC, Lucas didn't actually decide that Vader and Anakin were the same person until ESB, which is why ROTJ had the whole "truth from a certain point of view" speech to explain things.That depends on if you consider "Star Wars" or "The Star Wars Trilogy" to be the work in question. I lean towards the latter and the story is better for the twists and turns it took along the way. Obi-Wan was being intentionally misleading to push Luke into his "destiny," here we just have plain old inconsistencies that force the audience to justify it.
Fair enough. Even those versions (from what I remember) gave Leia a plausible, if weak, cover story at least and didn't have her as part of the Rebel Fleet.
Clearly few are bothered by this as much as I am, so there isn't much use in me continuing to try to convince anyone that "it would have been better if X."
Everything I've ever seen or read has it that nothing of substance was altered between the theatrical release and the VHS/laserdisc releases. So feel free to over solid proof to the contrary if you can.
Everything I've ever seen or read has it that nothing of substance was altered between the theatrical release and the VHS/laserdisc releases. So feel free to over solid proof to the contrary if you can.
There are lots of "I remember it different from the cinema" stories about Star Wars. Very few are true.Everything I've ever seen or read has it that nothing of substance was altered between the theatrical release and the VHS/laserdisc releases. So feel free to over solid proof to the contrary if you can.
Yeah, but Reverend was talking about theatrical vs VHS/Laserdisc. The changes from theatrical to Blu-ray are numerous and well documented. From cinema to VHS there are certainly changes, but they're usually subtle and very rarely visual.In the theatrical release he says something like "It's all right, trust me." In the Blue Ray he says "It's all right, I can see a lot better."
Awesome movie. No complaints.
1. Actors were cast who resembled Tarkin and Leia, then CGI on that performance.
A New Hope having both Leia and Antillies telling the same lie makes it seem that was the agreed upon cover story if they were ever caught.
The only way to completely rationalize this is to have the Tantive IV NOT be the ship that detaches from the Mon Cal ship. Having the ship that fled the battle then hand off the plans to the Tantive would make that lie more believable.
I'm aware (though they weren't "look alikes," they just had the same general face shape to which the CGI could be mapped over). But the last part is the issue for me.Actors were cast who resembled Tarkin and Leia, then CGI on that performance.
I just have to disagree. If anything, they rammed into its depths at top speed. That's the thing about the Uncanny Valley; the harder you try to get out of it, the deeper you end up going more often than not.This was the furthest climb up and out of Uncanny Valley I've ever seen.
My only issue with all of that is... when and how did R2 and 3PO get onboard? They were clearly on Yavin after the Admiral had already left to engage the Empire.Why is that so hard to believe? Besides, that particular lie just so happens to be mostly true. It *is* a consular ship and they *are* on a mission to take a dignitary to meet a diplomat to discuss matters of state...Antillies just omitted that the dignitary is a wanted fugitive and the matters of state are "war with the Empire".
Having said that I wouldn't be surprised if Leia was the only one who knew they were picking up Kenobi. All Antillies needed to know was "we're landing outside Mos Espa, the Princess has a mission and we're to wait for her to come back."
Here's the thing: there were a dozen or more CR90 corvettes running around in that engagement, most of them look identical and the Tantive IV was out of that hanger less than 60 seconds before they jumped. It's not unreasonable to hope the Devastator didn't have time to scan them, thus giving plausible deniability.
It just so happens that Vader doesn't feel like abiding by the rules of due process because he knows full well it's the same ship. Moreover they know he knows but the point of lying isn't to convince him, it's to keep up the facade as long as possible, both to slow the Imperials down and there's the slim hope that they can spark an outrage in the Senate.
That last point may have been valid since Palpatine dissolved the senate like a day later. Coincidence, or did they not buy Vader's bullshit?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.