What do they wear in the books? A fig leaf?
Aren't they all supposed to be reborn at like 25 years old, too? Do they age from that point or do they remain perpetually 25?Yes and everyone is reborn naked and hairless. All the "defects" are fixed to. So guy in the movie wearing glasses. WRONG!!!!!!
IIRC they don't age.Aren't they all supposed to be reborn at like 25 years old, too? Do they age from that point or do they remain perpetually 25?Yes and everyone is reborn naked and hairless. All the "defects" are fixed to. So guy in the movie wearing glasses. WRONG!!!!!!
IIRC they don't age.Aren't they all supposed to be reborn at like 25 years old, too? Do they age from that point or do they remain perpetually 25?Yes and everyone is reborn naked and hairless. All the "defects" are fixed to. So guy in the movie wearing glasses. WRONG!!!!!!
if i remember... it was not a horse. it was a mechanical device.
I thought it was OK... Although the lead actor just isn't charismatic enough.
At least it delved more into the purpose/workings of Riverworld than the previous SciFi effort a couple of years ago.
I have not read the books, for what it matters.
if i remember... it was not a horse. it was a mechanical device.
There was a distinct lack of cybernetic creatures roaming the River bank, too.
I dont see where he gave anything about the book away.... he mentioned no plot details...
I dont see where he gave anything about the book away.... he mentioned no plot details...
Yep, if anything his description is just enough to make me want to read the books.
*ducks and covers* Sorry-I just like to discover things myself. I rarely read the backs of paperbacks prior to buying unless the cover/title are completely confusing. I just thought he was doing some of the author's work for him, that's all-but like Temis said, it's easier to Not read it given the length of the post.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.