Ugh, not this again.
Why is "dated" bad?? I honestly don't get this.
Of course TOS music sounds like it was made in the 1960's. IT WAS. That's precisely WHY it was good.
"Dated" is NOT a bad thing.
"Not this again"? Some people just don't like how the TOS music sounds, that's all. You say that TOS' music sounding like it was made in the '60's is what makes it good. I dislike TOS' music, and (probably not coincidentally) I dislike a lot of music from the '60's. So to me, that "it sounds like it's from the '60's" aspect is part of what makes it
bad.
"Dated" IS a bad thing, isn't it? Doesn't "dated" generally mean "clearly identifiable as a product of its time" in a way that sticks out and distracts from the other qualities of the production? At least, in this kind of context (discussing TV shows or movies), I don't think I've ever seen it used to mean anything other than that.
30+ years from now, will others look at some music that I like in various modern/recent sci-fi movies or shows or games, and say "Man, that's dated, especially since the music is supposed to go with a story that takes place in the future!"? Maybe so. But that's fine; those hypothetical future people are entitled to their opinion.
If he had worked hard for Star Trek we wouldn't have gotten so many of years of crap (namely on Voyager and Enterprise but only because, as I understand it, Berman mostly ignored DS9.)
One: blaming Berman
entirely for the "years of crap" is completely insane. He DID make some bad decisions, no doubt about it, but he didn't personally write ever episode. Both VOY and ENT suffered from a serious lack of quality writing from a variety of people.
Two: working hard does not mean that you absolutely WILL put out a high-quality product. You can work hard and still fail. It sucks, and certainly, when it happens, you can (hopefully) look back and see where you went wrong, but the failure itself doesn't mean you were slacking off.
Of course he has the right to earn a salary, nothing at wrong with any of that. My problem is with him earning a salary in spite of shilling out a shit product. It seemed like he was going to get paid no matter what he did so he had no incentive to do a good job.
Of course he was going to get paid no matter what. His job was to manage and oversee the production of Trek shows, and he did that. If they had been bad enough in the eyes of the people he worked for that he should have been fired, then he WOULD have been fired (and the show in question possibly cancelled... which, of course, was what happened with ENT).
Name me a scenario in which an executive producer or show runner
isn't fired, but is in fact kept on by the studio/network and asked to continue to produce the material, yet isn't paid simply because the ratings weren't high.
I can't say that I agree with every creative decision that Berman made, but without knowing the guy I wouldn't put what I perceive as shortcomings in the show(s) down to his sloth or greed.
This. Incompetance doesn't make you a bad person, or a lazy person, or a greedy person. Berman was responsible for some very bad creative decisions in later Trek, but he was FAR from the only factor that led to so many of the problems of later Trek, and he did a lot of good on TNG (and, though he didn't meddle closely in DS9 throughout its run, he DID help to bring it to life).
Imagine a world where George Lucas or Irvin Kershner told John Williams to cut the Imperial March for drawing too much attentional to itself. The world would have lost one of its most memorable pieces of film music, and that's not a world I want to live in. Just like I don't want to live in a world without Ron Jones' outstanding score for All Good Things but, unfortunately, I do.
Yeah. What could have been...

To be fair, I think McCarthy's score for AGT was
pretty good, but definitely not his best work. And so many TNG eps had far more forgettable music than AGT.
Something almost as bad DID happen in the form of the bizarre asteroid field battle in Attack of the Clones which not only lacked music but sound as well! Lucas really lost his mind when he signed off on the numerous bad ideas in the prequels.
So EVERY action scene needs to have bombastic scoring? The asteroid field scene in AOTC was clearly meant to give you a "vacuum of space" kind of feeling, and the lack of music and sound was meant to make those "BWWWAAANG" sound effects for the explosives Jango used even more noticeable. You may not like that particular creative decision, but to compare the (quite intentional) lack of music in ONE SCENE to the notion of Star Wars without the Imperial March is a huge stretch.
All of that said... I can't say I agree with Rick Berman on the issue of Ron Jones. It's funny... I didn't like most of the music from TNG s1 or 2 (with a few exceptions), but in s3, things REALLY picked up; as others have noted, "The Defector," "Best of Both Worlds", and others had some excellent music. So just when things got
good, you fire the guy!
"Sonic wallpaper" doesn't really do it for me either. There were still some good scores to be had (Jay Chattaway was ok, sometimes great but usually just "there"; Dennis McCarthy was fantastic when he was allowed to stretch his legs with a score, but again, since he often stuck to the "tamp it down" routine for many episodes, his music too was often just "there"), but I do wish Berman hadn't gotten this idea into his head that powerful music was automatically
overpowering (in a bad way) music.
The best scores ever in anything with "Star Trek" in the name remain movies 7-10, IMO. TUC's score I didn't like
quite as much overall, but it was still good, and had an amazing opening theme. Also, the score for DS9's "The Siege of AR-558" was quite good, especially during the big battle at the end (I loved how the mood of the music was tragic rather than heroic or action-y; REALLY added a lot to the overall "war is hell" feel of that battle).