Thought you were going to PM me?
This will be my last post in this thread:
Your last post proves you don't understand anything I've tried to say. The purpose of this thread was never about winning or losing, right or wrong, or for that matter proving ANYTHING.
This was clearly a controversial choice by Worf, and I was interested in a CNN Crossfire type discussion with different ideas and philosophies.
In other words, I was interested in an IDIC style philosophical discussion/debate.
The problem was that we never understood one another's point of view. We each prodded the other, but I took exception to the memes and snide remarks as a sign of disrespect.
I don't agree with Worf's decision, but worse than that, I wish the episode had explored this decision with some pros and cons. Instead, to me, it came off as a quick fix by the writers so that Alexander wouldn't have to be in every episode. Why give Worf a son if the writing team doesn't want to commit? They did, when, the following season? But that still doesn't excuse the episode's inability to explore this controversial decision. That of a parent sending his kid away to live with his grandparents.
You can post more memes, snide remarks if you wish, but I'm done.
Hailing frequencies closed.