Eh, something for everyone? Where you saw sophistication, I saw a pretentious soap opera. With sprinkles of your sophistication, a MASH movie would work. But, if that makes too large a part of it, then it collapses under its own preachy weight. And the last thing audiences today need is to go "escape" into the theater for a sermon from Hollywood on the horrors of war...
Eh, something for everyone? Where you saw sophistication, I saw a pretentious soap opera. With sprinkles of your sophistication, a MASH movie would work. But, if that makes too large a part of it, then it collapses under its own preachy weight. And the last thing audiences today need is to go "escape" into the theater for a sermon from Hollywood on the horrors of war...
The last thing people need is to go to the theater and see a re-hashed idea. Particularly one that got it so right the first time, a second try wouldn't be a better thing. Go remake Sliders-now that could benefit from a re-do!
The last thing people need is to go to the theater and see a re-hashed idea.
The last thing people need is to go to the theater and see a re-hashed idea.
Ben-Hur was a rehash of a silent film that was a rehash of a novel. Casablanca was a rehash of a play. Citizen Kane was a thinly veiled rehash of the life of William Randolph Hearst. West Side Story was a rehash of Romeo & Juliet, which like virtually all Shakespeare's plays was a rehash of an earlier work. I could go on. The majority of the most successful and acclaimed movies ever made are adaptations of pre-existing concepts. Originality is in the execution, not the source.
^Like I said, the quality of a story is in its execution. If someone found a way to redo M*A*S*H and do it well, pull off something fresh and worthwhile, that would be enough to justify it. I think it's naive to assume one can judge in advance that a certain type of project isn't worth doing. In the right hands, even the most unexpected thing can turn out to be brilliant.
Not that I think that's likely. M*A*S*H was a product of its era, and its quality was largely a result of the particular group of people involved in it and their own distinct creative choices. I don't like the movie at all, and from what I've read about the original books, I'd almost certainly like them even less. So I don't think that M*A*S*H is a concept that's guaranteed to succeed. I just think it's unreasonable to dismiss the concept of remakes out of hand, given how many great works of fiction -- including the M*A*S*H TV series itself -- have been remakes.
Gojirob, you almost make it sound plausible. Almost.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.