Replace Nimoy in TSFS?

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies I-X' started by Tenacity, Sep 2, 2018.

  1. Commishsleer

    Commishsleer Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Location:
    Backwaters of Australia
    It would have been more realistic for Spock not to coincidentally return to his actual age.
    However no-one has every played Spock better than Nimoy and noone ever will. Even cute little boy Spock.
    Aside from that imagine Shatner having to compete against a younger man.
     
  2. Christopher

    Christopher Writer Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    I've always sort of assumed that Spock was younger than he looked (proportional to Vulcan aging) in TMP and TWOK and that the Genesis Effect actually made him age past where he'd been before. After all, he was only mid-50s as of TWOK, and we know from Sarek, Tuvok, and T'Pol that a Vulcan should still look like a human in their prime well into their 100s.

    Let's see, Spock was 157 when he went back into the Kelvin Timeline and survived another 5 years, so he died of natural causes at 162, which is actually pretty young for a Vulcan. Sarek made it to 203, which was a typical Vulcan lifespan according to "Broken Bow" (although The Making of Star Trek set Vulcan life expectancy at 250). So that's consistent with my notion. Although Spock being half-human could also explain his faster aging and shorter lifespan.
     
    saddestmoon and jaime like this.
  3. bolak

    bolak Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2014
    I disagree, I think it would have made perfect sense. The rest of the crew hadn't been regenerated from dead tissue by a terraformer-gone-crazy

    It was less 'realistic' to bring back Mr Nimoy in that scenario. And that also precluded a lot of interesting possibilities ( Kirk vs younger Spock as suggested, Sarek and Amanda struggling to accept a 'new' son, relationship with Saavik )

    Instead we were hit with the Universal Reset Trick. What a cop-out.
     
  4. Khan 2.0

    Khan 2.0 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2013
    Location:
    earth...but when?...spock?
    Kind of OT but why didn't Spock have a beard at end of Trek III when Kirk beamed him off genesis?
     
  5. Nyotarules

    Nyotarules Vice Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Location:
    London
    The Genesis device gave him a close shave
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  6. JonnyQuest037

    JonnyQuest037 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Verona, New Jersey, USA
    But there was no reason to bring in a new actor as Spock. What the studio and audiences wanted back then wasn't just Spock, it was Nimoy as Spock. Anything else would've been financial suicide.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2018
  7. johnnybear

    johnnybear Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Well they have accepted Zachary Quinto as Spock, although he does look a helluva lot like our Len but will they accept Ethan J.Peck in DSC? Time will tell...
    JB
     
  8. JonnyQuest037

    JonnyQuest037 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Verona, New Jersey, USA
    I was talking about in the context of the early 1980s. It's a very different thing to cast someone else in the role when you're telling the story of a young Spock and Nimoy is in his late 70s or deceased. The question was about recasting Spock for Star Trek III at a time when Nimoy was active and available, and no, I don't think it would have worked.
     
  9. johnnybear

    johnnybear Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Nope! In 1983 there would have been a lot of dissent about someone taking over the role of Spock!
    JB